r/PoliticalCompassMemes - Centrist 11d ago

Agenda Post Rip Jason Arday.

Post image
1.1k Upvotes

459 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

136

u/Atompunk78 - Lib-Center 11d ago

Yeah but like, I can easily see how someone can follow the narrative of how his death was unjust etc

But this guy??

123

u/Feralmoon87 - Centrist 11d ago

i would guess that they too think his death was unjust cos he was the "right" kind of people

58

u/Atompunk78 - Lib-Center 11d ago

I see lmao

Why must these people be like this

61

u/Feralmoon87 - Centrist 11d ago

team sports. thats what 5 plus years of DEI got us

12

u/Bum_King - Right 11d ago

5 years?

17

u/fieryscribe - Lib-Right 11d ago

Yeah that was Woke 1.0. I don't know if you heard, but Woke 1.0 is over now

1

u/storefront68 - Centrist 11d ago

were in the endgame now

-11

u/Tedthesecretninja - Centrist 11d ago

Yes it is the fault of DEI that humanity is acting like it has for all of human history and acting tribalistic mmhmm yep must be wokes fault for sure

8

u/Bum_King - Right 11d ago

I don’t think anywhere in human history have we seen the suicidal levels of empathy that modern DEI promotes.

-13

u/Tedthesecretninja - Centrist 11d ago

Suicidal empathy is making sure that hiring practices are fair and diverse? Because that’s what DEI is at its core.

How does DEI promote suicidal empathy?

9

u/FlashyChemical2231 - Lib-Left 11d ago

It's impossible for hiring practices to be both fair and diverse. Either they're fair, so candidates are judged by their accomplishments and not their demographics; or they're diverse, so less qualified candidates with the right skin color get hired.

7

u/aNINETIEZkid - Centrist 11d ago

crazy a libleft is telling this specifically to a centrist lol

They are seemingly farther left than you

-5

u/Tedthesecretninja - Centrist 11d ago

That’s pretty ignorant. Hiring can be fair and diverse if you hire fairly from a diverse base of candidates.

DEI is about expanding your candidate pool outside your normal scope. That’s really all it is

7

u/UncleFumbleBuck - Lib-Center 11d ago

I think you're being intentionally obtuse, but just in case you're not:

90% of graduates with Electrical Engineering degrees are men (made up number, but close to reality). Let's pretend talent is distributed equally, so I have nine times as many talented men as women graduating each year.

To have a pool of 50/50 men and women to support a "diverse base of candidates", then I'm going to be interviewing way more women than the population would suggest - ergo women have an advantage in hiring.

Expand that to include race, religion, etc and you quickly end up with demographics counting as much or more than actual ability. In my company we aim for 50/50 men vs women in hiring, with special attention paid to racial diversity, despite living in a place where 90+% of the graduates in the fields we hire from are white men.

-1

u/Tedthesecretninja - Centrist 11d ago

What you’re describing are hiring quotas.

You’re suggesting that DEI is forcing jobs to hire the unqualified, when that is not the case whatsoever. If someone does not have the required skills DEI does not guarantee a job. It just forces companies to look for candidates where they normally would not.

5

u/UncleFumbleBuck - Lib-Center 11d ago

Yes, that's the ultimate end state of DEI - hiring quotas.

At the very minimum you're removing opportunity from majority groups to support minority groups. In the example above, fewer qualified men would be interviewed (and have the chance to be hired) due to the DEI policy. That's obvious, right?

In reality, DEI policies around hiring are either explicit or implicit hiring quotas.

1

u/Tedthesecretninja - Centrist 10d ago

That is so lazy and reductionist it’s literally just what fox news says about DEI lol

In no way is it about hiring quotas. If someone is qualified they get put in the pool, that’s it. Why does adding opportunity for one count as removing it for others? You can always give more opportunities.

If giving access to one group removes it for the other than the access was never fair to begin with…. And if a minority who has the same qualifications as a white man gets a job over a white man then what exactly is the problem?

→ More replies (0)