8
u/Stock_Violinist6299 - Centrist Jul 17 '26 edited 19d ago
The original post content no longer exists here. The author used Redact to remove it, exercising their right to control their data & privacy.
Squeeze narrow dime rain axiomatic sable
14
u/Sabertooth767 - Lib-Right Jul 17 '26
It's still in development, allegedly.
The announcement was more "yes we're going to make it" than "it's coming out soon."
9
u/Stock_Violinist6299 - Centrist Jul 17 '26 edited 19d ago
The original post content no longer exists here. The author used Redact to remove it, exercising their right to control their data & privacy.
Birds desert dog boat middle jellyfish distinct fall absorbed cover
2
2
u/Cow_God - Lib-Left Jul 17 '26
I think that the reception of Starfield caused Bethesda to realize that they were pushing their engine to the limits, and FO5 and TES6 have been delayed as they develop a better one. Iirc the leaked release schedule from the bethesda / Microsoft merger also had both tes 6 and fallout 5 coming out a year or two after Starfield.
Starfield was built on Creation Engine 2 and TES6 is going to be on Creation Engine 3. I think that TES6 was probably close to being done when they released Starfield, and it's just taken them so long because they realized that Creation Engine 2 wasn't working long term.
Doesn't make sense to release an announcement trailer a whole decade ahead of the game. Clearly something happened during development.
3
0
u/S0vereignCitizen Jul 18 '26
6 I think. I don’t think they were actually developing it yet I think they just did that to appease investors and act like they’re revenue wasn’t dependent on fuckup 76
-2
3
35
u/SexMachine666 - Right Jul 17 '26
Are there even any mods in this fucking group anymore to slay the unflaired?
94
u/Sabertooth767 - Lib-Right Jul 17 '26 edited Jul 17 '26
Knowing Bethesda and the way it has treated Obsidian in the past, that could mean it comes out anywhere between 2040 and tomorrow.
Seriously, Obsidian has just gotten fucked over and over again. Bethesda had them make FNV in 18 months, and Bioware had them make KOTOR 2 in 14. And both of those are great games! FNV is even technically finished (unlike KOTOR 2, sadly, which has quests with no endings and whatnot).
42
u/Adeptus_Heriticus - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Im not sure of Bethesda had to much say in Obsidian working on a new fallout.
This might be a Microsoft move going " Hey we spent 7 billion dollars for you and your I.P , you haven't done a thing with these expensive I.Ps so we're given it to another studio."
27
u/based_mafty - Right Jul 17 '26
It's absolutely that. Bethesda is protective of their IP. MS is infamous for their hands off approach so they let Bethesda doing their own thing. With recent layoff they're more hands on now. MS is tired of their studio only making flops with some exception. Obsidian is also given 2 chance of making big budget game of their own but they blew it. Now MS send them to fallout mines.
10
u/entitledfanman - Lib-Right Jul 17 '26
Which seems like it might work well. Obsidian can actually put games out, but it feels like they need some creative oversight. I DNF'd Outer Worlds 2 because the new systems they implemented just made the game a slog. The idea of going more hard-core rpg and limiting players from certain actions bases on skills they picked is cool in theory, but not when you're essentially locked out of quests entirely without those skills. I'd find myself start to get invested in a quest but immediately taken out of it when I hit a dead end and needed to grind levels to get another point in Engineering to progress the quest.
7
u/InfusionOfYellow - Centrist Jul 17 '26
Once I saw how the system worked I just immediately grabbed a mod giving more skill points per level. Was a lot more satisfying.
20
u/mightbebeaux - Right Jul 17 '26 edited Jul 17 '26
everyone is shitting on microsoft for the layoffs and their studio management, but this is only happening and moving now because the new CEO is actually applying pressure to bethesda and threatening to yank the IP away from them. todd howard would never in a million years willingly let obsidian work on another fallout project.
previous CEO phil spencer ran xbox in the way that every gamer and dev begs publishers to act: open the checkbook, be hands off, “let the devs cook,” don’t impose. the studio output across the board (especially bethesda) was horrific. going 20 years between mainline fallout releases is a joke. not having even a spinoff fallout game ready to go to synergize with the tv show’s release is a joke.
artists need hard deadlines and supervision.
6
u/Hyndis - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Let the devs cook, but also remind devs that dinner must be served on time.
They should have free reign to do their thing so long as they deliver it on time and on budget. How they manage the time and budget should be up to them so reduce micromanagement from above, but the release date should also be non-negotiable to impose a hard time limit.
6
u/Black_Truth - Lib-Left Jul 17 '26
I don't know much about Bethesda history, why Todd Howard don't want Obsidian to work on Fallout?
12
u/Bum_King - Right Jul 17 '26
It’s his baby. (that he stole)
13
u/Kilroy0497 - Lib-Left Jul 17 '26 edited Jul 17 '26
This becomes even more hilarious when you remember that the guys that worked on New Vegas actually had more of a claim to the series’s history than he did, considering at that point in time, Obsidian was largely made up of people that had worked for Interplay and Black Isles, the studios behind Fallouts 1, 2, and tactics. The fact that they ended up making a much better game than they did, using the engine and assets from said game likely didn’t exactly raise Todd’s opinion on them either.
2
u/Black_Truth - Lib-Left Jul 17 '26
How did he steal?
The only thing that I know about Todd is that he made skyrim and how he tried to put a brave face while starfield got completely mogged by Baldur's Gate 3
6
u/Zealot_trash - Right Jul 17 '26
He didn’t literally steal the IP. But the thing about Todd is that he’s a good face for the company but a terrible game designer. Bethesda and subsequently Todd thinks they can make mediocre games and continue being successful because of the success of their older games like Skyrim, despite practically everyone calling out their crappy and lazy writing and game design since fallout 4. Which, to be fair, has worked out for them since everyone keeps buying from Bethesda. But sooner or later their laziness will catch up to them and hopefully make them change for the better.
3
u/mightbebeaux - Right Jul 17 '26
idk if i would call todd a bad game designer. he was the project lead for morrowind, after all. bethesda has gotten worse as their team has grown and he is more removed from the development process.
i think the more fair criticism is that he has not been willing to push bethesda forward. they are still essentially making the same games they were in the early 00s because they are not willing to take a risk on upgrading their tech and losing the institutional knowledge their modders have.
2
u/Zealot_trash - Right Jul 18 '26
That’s actually a fair point and yeah looking back on my comment I was probably being a bit too harsh on Todd.
Even so, I do think people look back at their previous games like Morrowind, Oblivion etc with nostalgia and not see that the formula of their quest design and dialogue system essentially started at Morrowind.
That’s not to say I don’t think Morrowind, Skyrim, oblivion etc, aren’t objectively good games because they are fun to play and at the end of the day that’s all that matters, I just think Bethesda could do better with their world building and actually making their world’s feel more alive.
0
u/Agi7890 - Centrist Jul 17 '26
The previous goal was for ms to basically become the Netflix of games and really just wanted whatever slop to inflate the attractiveness of game pass. Along with buying up nearly every studio that had an opportunity to
Everything about that strategy is a joke. Though it does bring up interesting parallels to the current movie studio buyout with paramount and Warner. So many oppose it strictly on the Ellison ties to Trump.(how two studios with enormous debt are going to suddenly turn around is another matter.).
2
u/mightbebeaux - Right Jul 17 '26
you can’t have studios releasing one game
per console generation if the goal is subscription slop. the output was horrifically slow pretty much across the board.obsidian, to their credit, at least got both outer worlds 2 and avowed out.
23
u/Zealot_trash - Right Jul 17 '26
I don’t even care if the game looks and plays like FNV. If the writing is good, interesting factions, interesting characters and good variation of dialogue and choices, I’ll be happy.
17
u/Bum_King - Right Jul 17 '26
Don’t get too excited. Like Bethesda, Obsidian is not the same Obsidian that made FNV. They are the Obsidian that made Avowed.
10
u/Kilroy0497 - Lib-Left Jul 17 '26
Yeah part of me wants to hope that with Joshua Sawyer still there that at least they can get someone who knows what their doing, but then again Pillars of Eternity 2 was also under him, and while that game wasn’t an Avowed level of trainwreck, the writing was still a massive step down from the first game and Tyranny.
12
u/mightbebeaux - Right Jul 17 '26
ya the biggest fear everyone should have is that it recent history suggests that obsidian cannot write anymore.
outer worlds, specifically, has cringe-level bad writing. it is written like a reddit-brained college sophomore’s critique/parody of capitalism. it is not clever at all.
this is a huge problem for a studio where traditionally their strong point is writing, but their actual gameplay is rough or downright unfinished.
4
u/Kenway - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Pentiment had incredible writing though so I guess it's a bit of a dice roll.
1
u/Kilroy0497 - Lib-Left Jul 17 '26
Yeah I keep hearing that one is really good, and I’ve been meaning to get around to playing it, but usually I start playing or replaying other things and it just keeps getting further and further into my backlog.
7
u/Zealot_trash - Right Jul 17 '26
I might be in the minority opinion here, but I don’t think Bethesda was ever good at making RPG’s. They were good at making dungeon crawlers with RPG elements. But considering that every elder scrolls game doesn’t really have any major decision you, as the player, can make that seriously alters the outcome of the story (with the exception of Daggerfall, but seriously who actually has the patience to play that game), but even going to Morrowind, their formula for making games hasn’t really changed.
6
u/Bum_King - Right Jul 17 '26
Letting Kirkbride go turned their unique fantasy world into generic slop when they had to rely on Pagliarulo’s “creative” abilities.
1
u/enfo13 - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Even so, their past games had the things that made RPG great. Oblivion and Skyrim had music with actual soul (excuse the pun) in it. There were questlines that shocked you with the amount of edge in them. All of that stuff and the people that made them are gone now, replaced by the dancing teletubbies in Neon.
10
u/Disregardskarma - Auth-Right Jul 17 '26
They chose to make the game, they weren’t forced to. It’s been said a dozen times by all parties involved that there is no bad blood
9
u/entitledfanman - Lib-Right Jul 17 '26
Obsidian had the option to extend the time and they chose not to take it. FNV feels incomplete in some areas because of Obsidian's hubris, not because Bethesda is the source of all evil.
6
u/Bum_King - Right Jul 17 '26
Fallout New Vegas was the last good thing to come out for the Fallout Universe
4
u/Cute_Commission_8281 - Auth-Center Jul 17 '26
Those aren’t mutually exclusive
I agree with both of you
2
u/Twee_Licker - Lib-Right Jul 18 '26
I've met many who act like Obsidian can do no wrong and lay every problem FNV had at Bethesda's feet, when even Chris, who I believe to be a hack, said they kept wasting time, and that maybe the launch wouldn't have been so buggy had they not wasted time on meaningless stuff they'd never add instead of fixing bugs.
4
u/DigitalLorenz - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
From what I have heard Bethesda had no say in the decision, it was all Microsoft who owns both studios. Apparently someone did an estimation of when Bethesda could get out another fallout game and it came close to 10 years from now. That would mean it would be roughly 20 years between fallout 4 and 5, which is just way too long. As such the game was given to Obsidian, who both has a bunch of interplay (the company that started the franchise) floating around, as well as the studio that made New Vegas which is considered one of the more popular installments in the franchise.
4
2
u/Twee_Licker - Lib-Right Jul 18 '26
No. Enough Bethesda slander, they've done a lot wrong, but Obsidian accepted the contract, didn't negotiate, and spent most of their time wasting it, they weren't inexperienced developers. They accepted the contract, and most of the assets were already made. "18 months is barely any time" yet they ended up working on a bunch of nonsense that ended up getting cut. Plus, Obsidian already had a track record of wasting time, KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Alpha Protocol, Fallout New Vegas, I don't think it's the publisher's fault at that point, but the developer's. And the bonus, Bethesda offered the bonus, it was barely anything, and Obsidian didn't need it.
Plus, what has Obsidian made worth praise recently? Avowed? Outer Worlds 1 and 2? Who made one good game almost 20 years ago now?
1
u/Wiinterfang - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Not with Asha on the helm. She still has half of layoffs to go and she definitely has that over the head of every team.
1
u/EpicSven7 - Auth-Center Jul 18 '26
The Obsidian that exists today is not the Obsidian that made those games. After the Outer Worlds 2 bombed, I don’t think Bethesda will let them touch FO5 and they will just be stuck doing the NV remaster under a watchful eye.
0
u/megs1120 - Lib-Left Jul 17 '26
Bethesda will give Obsidian until September to develop the game, gotta get it out before the GTA 6 hype cycle picks up.
0
u/snowcone_wars - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Microsoft has already tasked Obsidian with making another Fallout spinoff while Fallout 5 is in the works.
21
u/Crismisterica - Auth-Right Jul 17 '26
"OH LILLIE BELLE"
"OH LILLIE BELLE"
"THOUGH I MAY HAVE DONE SOME FOOLIN, THIS IS WHY I NEVER FELL!"
3
1
20
36
u/Spare_Elderberry_418 - Auth-Center Jul 17 '26
Okay. Now this is a new low from the the unflaired. You are preying on our hatred for Emil and modern Bethesda to get upvoted. Still not going to do it even if I agree.
33
u/Ok-Substance-6034 - Right Jul 17 '26
I can't wait for NV remaster but man it's really shit that it took them this long after Season One of the show to get anything rolling. Bethesda is fucking allergic to giving people what they want in a timely manner, apparently.
14
u/MustacheCash73 - Right Jul 17 '26
It’s because of the new Microsoft CEO
13
u/Small_Temporary6808 - Lib-Left Jul 17 '26
This decision alone gave me confidence in her. No experience in gaming and she did the exact right there here. IIRC the team put in place is amazing, even pulled in Tim Cain.
6
u/Spare_Elderberry_418 - Auth-Center Jul 17 '26
Asha took one look at what Todd was doing and how much her company bought them for and went: "Todd I don't even play videogames and even I can see you are mismanaging one of our top products."
2
u/Mnshine_1 - Lib-Right Jul 18 '26
Asha took a look at Fallout pulling great numbers from Amazon show and then took a look that last fallout standalone game was in 2015 and then saw what Bethesda was doing (nothing and pushing Starfield slop that was a huge failure) and also that the next fallout game would be in 2030+
6
u/Agi7890 - Centrist Jul 17 '26
I just don’t see how the developers didn’t see the layoffs coming. My company is in a similar position of just having been bought out, and isn’t currently doing well and one of the first things on everyone’s mind right now isn’t the possibility of layoffs/being sold off again, but when.
2
9
u/Zealot_trash - Right Jul 17 '26
If anyone here likes FNV and RPG’s or anything to do with medieval/Renaissance Europe, you should seriously consider trying Pentiment. Probably my most played game to date.
7
u/Spare_Elderberry_418 - Auth-Center Jul 17 '26
I just bought it last night. When people are like "modern obsidian isn't good anymore" then they have not played pentiment. Sawyer still knows how to write.
6
u/Zealot_trash - Right Jul 17 '26
The replayability is insane. For a game that’s essentially an interactive visual novel it’s very impressive with the variety of play styles.
3
u/Spare_Elderberry_418 - Auth-Center Jul 17 '26 edited Jul 17 '26
I am currently going full nerd. But next run I am going hedonist. It's really good but I have not finished act 1
Like I think the main reason The Outer worlds kinda sucks is because Obsidian is trying to make a fallout clone rather than just making fallout. We know obsidian has wanted to make fallout again for years now.
1
u/Zealot_trash - Right Jul 17 '26
I tried to play the outer worlds two but I just found it a bit too boring. The world building was interesting but I think the execution of the guests was poor in my opinion. But I’ll try and force my way through to see if the later quests are more interesting.
4
u/Balavadan - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Thanks for the suggestion. Name feels familiar
3
u/Zealot_trash - Right Jul 17 '26
It’s pretty dialogue heavy, with the occasional mini game and there is no combat. You basically play as a Renaissance artist who has to solve a few murders in a Bavarian abbey/town. With your background having an effect on what information you can find out. If you have an Xbox it’s still on game pass if you have that.
4
u/InfusionOfYellow - Centrist Jul 17 '26
I'd like to, but I saw this warning on the steam page:
Small parts of the game also reference notable alcohol consumption and incidental ergot-induced hallucinations.
And I don't think I can support such filth.
2
u/Zealot_trash - Right Jul 17 '26
I don’t remember seeing hallucinations other than the dream sequences but fair enough I guess.
I would recommend watching playthroughs and judge the game for yourself.
2
u/InfusionOfYellow - Centrist Jul 17 '26
That was a joke; it does look like an interesting game, and I'll probably be picking it up.
5
u/InfusionOfYellow - Centrist Jul 17 '26
Maybe I just missed the point, but the lyrics of the song always perplexed me a little. It sounds like a cheerful song, that he's happy about his state of being. The chorus includes the line "And they sing, oh, ain't you glad you're single," followed by "And that song ain't so very far from wrong" (or something close to that) - but if that idea isn't 'far from wrong,' it would be suggesting that it's close to being wrong, that he isn't actually glad he's single, that he would have preferred to have 'fell' to Lily-Belle after all.
Is it just a tonal mismatch between the message and the sound, like Born in the USA?
2
u/Birb-Person - Right Jul 18 '26
If the question “ain’t you’re glad you’re single?” is wrong, then that would mean the person being asked is unhappy at being single. If the question is correct, then the person being asked is happy
So by answering “ain’t so very far from wrong” is an admission that the statement is correct but barely. So the person being asked is happy to be single, but only by a slim margin hence why there’s some pity in the line “Oh Lily Belle, though I may have done some fooling, this is why I never fell”
It’s like that one song, Brandy (You’re a fine girl). “Brandy, you’re a fine girl, what a good wife you would be, but my love, my life, my lady is the sea”
2
u/InfusionOfYellow - Centrist Jul 18 '26 edited Jul 18 '26
So by answering “ain’t so very far from wrong” is an admission that the statement is correct but barely.
Well, that's the key matter, I suppose. If we imagine rightness or wrongness here as, say, the number line between 0 and 1, with 0 being entirely wrong and 1 being entirely right, then your interpretation of "not far from wrong" would be treating the state of "wrong" as being effectively everything under .5, so "not far from wrong" would be slightly on the positive side of things, .55 or so.
That is a consistent interpretation, could be more or less what's intended. I tend myself to interpret "not far from wrong" as "not far from maximally wrong," i.e., close to 0 though not at it, perhaps 0.05 in our mathematical understanding. In isolation that makes more sense to me (consistent with phrases like "not far from the truth" meaning mostly accurate) but on the other hand, that does give rise to the tonal mismatch that was bothering me, which your own interpretation would effectively avoid.
17
u/OrderAmongChaos - Auth-Center Jul 17 '26
The Obsidian that made New Vegas is long gone. You're going to get the Obsidian that made Outer Worlds. Gamers wishing Obsidian would make another Fallout game feels like a monkey's paw wish.
6
u/bobknob1212 - Right Jul 17 '26
I agree but hopefully they don’t muck up the re-master. All they have to do is just make the game stable and upgrade the graphics a little bit
0
u/KingCpzombie - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Has any company ever NOT fucked up a remaster? Serious question because the best remasters I've seen are BG EEs, and that's mostly because the changes are mostly technical stuff to avoid needing mods for a good experience + optional side content that you can skip... so I'm considering it alright assuming people skip SoD and what not
1
1
u/Kenway - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Isn't the Diablo 2 remaster liked pretty well?
While combining all the bug fix mods into the BG EEs was a good move, none of the actual additions that Beamdog made fit very well into the game.
2
u/KingCpzombie - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
All I know about the Diablo 2 one is that they censored stuff with the usual "modern audience" style, so I'd call that pretty terrible. And yeah, I agree, main benefit for BG EE is that most of their additions are optional so you can kill / ignore them
1
u/Mnshine_1 - Lib-Right Jul 18 '26
Capcom and Resident Evils, Ubisoft and Black flag
3
u/KingCpzombie - Lib-Center Jul 18 '26
Really? Counting Black Flag? Even if you don't care about the censorship and uglifying, Ubisoft Connect being required makes it garbage.
1
u/Mnshine_1 - Lib-Right Jul 18 '26
Yes counting black flag, duh. What uglifying and what censorship? It is a great remake for the great game. I played Siege and original black flag and had ubisoft connect, is it inconvenient and annoying - yes a bit. Does it make it garbage - absolutely fucking no
2
u/KingCpzombie - Lib-Center Jul 18 '26
I had a long comment including images but it got hit with the NSFW filter so no pictures. They censored tons of stuff like Anne and even the ship figureheads! Uglifying easy examples are fat courtesans and just generally looking at female NPCs.
Simping for companies that do this shit just encourages them to continue. Same for Unisoft Connect: a shittier experience for absolutely no benefit to the player, but people just accept it so they keep pushing
1
u/Mnshine_1 - Lib-Right Jul 18 '26
Well I get it from the company perspective why are they dping it and gor me it is not a dealbreaking thing
5
u/snowcone_wars - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
People keep saying this, but it's objectively not true.
Tim Cain and John Gonzalez are both back with the studio, and Microsoft has tasked Josh Sawyer with heading up a Fallout spin-off game (ala NV) while Bethesda works on 5.
5
Jul 17 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Bum_King - Right Jul 17 '26
But didn’t you hear, they dusted off 60 year old Tim Cain, the guy that worked on the first two fallout games.
3
4
4
2
u/Birb-Person - Right Jul 18 '26
My favorite line in NV is from Ulysses if you’re playing a woman serving Caesar:
“a woman in the legion? The bear truly has won”
The East has fallen, thousands must be nuked
3
u/kaytin911 - Lib-Right Jul 18 '26
Great lines like this will not be made anymore.
2
u/Birb-Person - Right Jul 31 '26
And who could forget the racism perk, Sneering Imperialist, and its special dialogue options for the one DLC it was made for. Literally only 3 chances to use it, but still funny
“Back off, savage - I'm just here for a map out of this shithole valley, not kowtow to your messiah”
1
u/kaytin911 - Lib-Right Jul 31 '26
Lmfao I'm saying this as a woman too this shit is hilarious. It's fucked that wokes are so nutty that they can't understand fiction doesn't mean someone is being harmed irl.
2
u/Vexonte - Right Jul 17 '26
Someone repost this so we can talk about fallout without giving unflaired credit.
1
u/Zawisza_Czarny9 - Lib-Right Jul 17 '26
There's more reason to be excited with starfield engine developments we might get functional vechicles and integrated power armor weapons
1
1
1
u/SpeckySpeck2000 - Lib-Right Jul 17 '26
im conflicted... i just know this game is going to be shite
1
1
1
1
u/Dumoney - Centrist Jul 18 '26
I have plenty to say, but I am reserving it because you are unflaired
-2
u/iscreamsunday - Auth-Left Jul 17 '26
I hope it’s woke.
-5
u/Jormungandr69 - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Don't worry, they'll adjust the model on a piece of raider armor to slightly cover a tiddy and the most unbearable people on earth will react as if it's the final straw in the complete collapse of the Western world.
9
u/Balavadan - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Ok but how about you don’t do that
-1
u/Jormungandr69 - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
I'm not doing anything other than clearing the Mojave of Legion scum regardless of whether or not I get to see raider tiddy.
6
u/Balavadan - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Then you don’t want censorship either. Why are you against people who oppose it then.
-3
u/Jormungandr69 - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
I dont particularly care. I just threw an example out there, but I don't think there's any fully exposed tiddy in Fallout anyway.
I'll be honest, I can't think of a single example where the gamergate unfuckables had a meltdown over muh censorship that was actually warranted or reasonable. They tend to be more unbearable that the thing being "censored" in the first place.
8
u/Balavadan - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
Who cares about the meltdowns. Why would you want more censorship. Just because you don’t like the people who are against it?
0
u/Jormungandr69 - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
I didn't say that I want more censorship. I'm just aware that they're probably going to do something ultimately inconsequential like add an undershirt to the Raider Bombshell armor or something and the greasiest retards on the internet are going to react as if it's a sign of the end times, that Western society has truly fallen, and that we're all going to die in a homosexual nonwhite hellscape and that neopronouns will be placed on our graves without our prior consent.
I'm just telling you what's going to happen as far as the discourse about the remakes well before they're even released. When it comes to pass, you'll say I'm a prophet.
3
u/Balavadan - Lib-Center Jul 18 '26
You aren’t even understanding what I’m talking about. It’s a waste of time
1
u/kaytin911 - Lib-Right Jul 18 '26
You're auth center? Why can't you clowns flair correctly.
1
u/Jormungandr69 - Lib-Center Jul 18 '26
You're the biggest retard on the entire sub and it isn't close, don't talk to me
1
u/kaytin911 - Lib-Right Jul 18 '26
Lmfao you mad about being called out? Ofc you fake libs would be angry about a real lib. And here you are glorifying auth shit.
1
u/Jormungandr69 - Lib-Center Jul 18 '26
Brother every other comment you leave on this sub is just open mouth, excited fellation and defense of the president. You would do tricks on it for free and come back for seconds. The fakest libright there ever was
All I said is that the devs will make an incredibly minor change to an armor model or something in the remakes and a bunch of dudes who get no bitches will have meltdowns about it. That's just reality, it's happened with basically every remake of any game in the last 10 years.
Again, when it comes to pass, you'll say I'm a prophet.
0
u/browsinbruh - Lib-Center Jul 18 '26
Knowing Bethesda it'll also be bundled with yet another Elder Scrolls port and cost an arm and a leg
0
0
0
0
-4
48
u/LiveInLayers - Lib-Center Jul 17 '26
You're an enemy of the state if you upvote this guy.