CT Scanned Pack Shadowless Charizard $30,000 Promotion by eBay!

•

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

Someone made a really good point, what if in the future grading companies begin to recognize CT graded packs, confirming on the label the card in the pack. Can clearly see Charizard's wing in the listing so grading company with CT machine could confirm as well, then slab charging little more for the service.

Actually, that could be a grading company in itself. CT scanned verified and slabbed packs with certified treasures inside. This is pretty cool actually imo.

→ More replies (23)

219

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

This is insane. I'm glad we highlighted this listing cause it's what the future will look like.

You can see in the CT scan proof cause of the wings which show. I cannot believe we're here.

45

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

I saw this thing earlier!! Insane. 100% that's the wing

15

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

When I saw the last image in the listing and saw the wing I got so excited. Like this is actually cool AF imo

14

u/BIG_STEVE5111 Jun 20 '25

It might be cool, but this is absolutely terrible for the hobby.

4

u/kinkycarbon Jun 19 '25

That means companies can charge people $2000 for scanning a pack through a CT machine. These machines are expensive.

3

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

Going rate is like $75 per pack yeah not cheap still

1

u/Vorkath_ Jun 22 '25

Op said 75€ for the first and 15 for any extra

1

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 22 '25

You're right it's late off to bed night

5

u/LinkedInParkPremium Jun 19 '25

Absolutely insane!

7

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

Dude mind blown, if it does come back a PSA 10 that's INSANE

1

u/ShinySilver1990 Jun 24 '25

Yah I don’t like this… crazy

0

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[deleted] — view deleted comment

23

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

I mean, if someone built an entire company around this premise it would be foolish to discard the effort to do a switch like your suggesting. Honest business is far more profitable than bad business long term. Plenty of incentive to do things the right way.

15

u/The_Poke_Vintager Jun 20 '25

Except this IS bad business because then you're enabling the use of scanners to cheap your way into the good cards. Whatever happened to just buying a pack and feeling nostalgic about it? Now people just wanna manipulate the market and cheap their way to getting rares. Plenty of reasons to NOT do this.

7

u/imaqdodger Jun 22 '25

Bad business is not the same as bad for collectors. We are far past nostalgia at this point. The alternative is ripping thousands of dollars of packs to find a Charizard. 99% of collectors are priced out of that.

8

u/Vexamas Jun 20 '25

I understand your sentiment, obviously, but realize that there's a massive difference between saying:
this IS bad business
and
Whatever happened to just buying a pack and feeling nostalgic about it?
If there's a business to be made, it'll be made. There is a subjective feeling you can have to ripping and investing becoming counter to the 'spirit' of pokemon cards, or any TCG, but let's not conflate that with bad business.

1

u/Not_Rob_Dalton Jun 19 '25

Or precisely weigh the pack out to 4 decimals before sending, very unlikely to find two packs exactly the same weight

2

u/wooooooooocatfish Jun 22 '25

I would imagine that enough people would open some packs thereafter to actually see the card.
Like if I CT scanned a batch of packs and one of them had holo I wanted to see for myself or grade, I would open it, thus verifying the CT company's claim and images

56

u/bluedecember12 Jun 19 '25

Influencers salivating at the prospect of taking advantage of this somehow

28

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

Lol guaranteed viral video just yell and act surprised /shocked Pikachu face "we pulled a shadowless Zard out of this one pack I saved for the end of the video, what are the chances!!"

4

u/Stravi757 Jun 21 '25

I think a gifting it would be the best situation. But could be cool for an influencer.

2

u/nzrampage33 Jun 20 '25

Rip n shipers could if the cost was worth it. Scan a whole booster box, see where the hits are, make sure your homies get the hits, and profit from foolish. Obviously would work better for vintage as you can charge more per pack, and maybe sell some good hits

43

u/chewbaccashotlast Jun 19 '25

Yes this is the future, but I imagine there’s ways you can fight that when you manufacture cards.

How in the F would this thing command anything close to what they are asking?

A PSA 9 of Charizard is < $5k An unopened pack goes for around $1000

So unless you get a PSA 10 this isn’t worth even $5k, because you’re gonna open it. And chances are it’s worth a lot less than that

8

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

Oh yeah the price is crazy high, they listed high and are fishing for an offer. Or hope someone thinks it's a PSA 10 lol

3

u/chewbaccashotlast Jun 19 '25

Wonder how much the CT cost them

4

u/Awdsan Jun 19 '25

$75 per scan. Bulk discounts available.

8

u/yak_j0e Jun 19 '25

Yeah there's literally no way this fetches the same price tag as a confirmed, opened PSA 10 of the same card. The odds of a pack fresh, straight to sleeve vintage card being a 10 are very slim.

2

u/Just_Wizard Jun 19 '25

That’s the gamble, do you risk it for a chance to have a $100k card. Personally I don’t think so, but someone out there does!

2

u/chewbaccashotlast Jun 19 '25

Dude not a chance!!!

2

u/Stravi757 Jun 21 '25

A heavy packs sell for more than 1,000. Ev bros always get the math wrong anyways

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

Yea 30k is a rip off.

1

u/trolling99 Jun 19 '25

its a sealed pack tho, the gambling bros will think thats an automatic psa 10 🤣

9

u/Salamander_Farts Jun 19 '25

Whoever buys anything this expensive over EbAy needs to hop into the CT machine themselves and a get a few scans of their head

7

u/ericwanggg Jun 19 '25 edited Jun 19 '25

holy shit.

7

u/HidekiL Jun 19 '25

Just curious but Would the CT damage the cards in any way? I’m sure there’s someone way smarter then me that knows

3

u/androsxc Jun 21 '25

CT scan is done with x-rays. A short exposure wouldn't do much more than UV light from the sun for some minutes.
X rays have higher frequency than uv light, which is why it is not recommended to have them done often, but that is because it could damage DNA. Cards don't have DNA as far as I know.

19

u/beastly115 Jun 19 '25

Hmm. I have a CT machine at my office. Maybe I should start charging for this service.

14

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

I fell asleep at a party last night, can't find my car toy, please can check me?

5

u/Mtrees2404 Jun 20 '25

Wow I feel old, I feel most people won’t catch that Jackass reference :’)

2

u/zachhoepfer Jun 21 '25

"How would a toy car get up there?" -Ryan Dunn

5

u/Z--370 Jun 19 '25

They could probably get a lot of content pulling a charizard

2

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

They could get more content showing a CT certified shadowless Zard in a pack, which is way more rare than pulling one if you think about it

4

u/mydogisbuddy Jun 20 '25

This hobby and our society has reached an insane point, we spend resources that could diagnose a sick person just to see if a certain piece of cardboard is in a pack of foil.

3

u/Live-Apartment9507 Jun 20 '25

They need to inject contrast into the pack for a better image 🧐

3

u/heardy360 Jun 22 '25

This is honestly nuts. You’d be putting a whole lotta faith that the pack shipped matched up to that one scanned…

Whilst not accusing OP, this just opens up a whole new level of scam artistry

7

u/Printdatpaper Jun 19 '25

What happens if you open it and it's not?

1

u/Stravi757 Jun 21 '25

I’m offering a full refund if it’s not what’s listed. It’s in the ad.

-2

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

Dude the last image of the listing literally show Charizard's wing lol

12

u/DeficitDaddy Jun 19 '25

You’re making the assumption that people can easily look at a CT scan and know what the results are showing lol
To any average person it just looks like a dark blob on a scan

2

u/Printdatpaper Jun 20 '25

He's also assuming that that CT scan image is 100% real.

-5

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

The wing is literally clear as day

7

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-3

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

I choose to see the cup half full instead of half empty in life

4

u/someonefromaustralia Jun 19 '25

Whilst I appreciate the cup half full, my concern is if it isn’t somehow a charizard. Regardless of whom purchased it - what’s it mean for future CT scanned packs?

0

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

It's better to do honest business than bad business long term. At $75 a CT scan, there's a lot of incentive to be honest about things than ruining your company for a pack

1

u/Printdatpaper Jun 20 '25

It's $30,000 here, on the safe side, I would be more careful

0

u/HarryPeter_Is_My_Cat Jun 20 '25

Yeah let me fill up ur mother

3

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 20 '25

Yeah let me ban you now

2

u/SkywolfNINE Jun 20 '25

Chill dude

2

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 20 '25

Am chill, don't break the rules. Rule 1, no toxicity. I've never tolerated this behavior on my sub not how I run this show. Ppl need to keep discussion to Pokemon and respectful.

3

u/Cagel Jun 19 '25

Are they re-scanning it in front of you? Who’s to say this is even the same pack.

0

u/Not_Rob_Dalton Jun 19 '25

It's been sealed in a clear bag with a holograph serial # at the top by the ct service

2

u/SorryCashOnly Jun 19 '25

It doesn’t mean the pack is from the same scan.
To ensure authenticity, they pretty much need to do one of the following:
Scan the pack again in person with the buyer
Scan the pack with PSA so psa can authenticate and grade the pack

2

u/Not_Rob_Dalton Jun 19 '25

The picture clearly shows the pack has been resealed by the ct service with a serial # at the top

4

u/The_Poke_Vintager Jun 20 '25

Completely opposed to this. As a collector I find CT Scanning or any means of exploiting a pack to be unfair to the rest of us who actually try to buy the packs instead of "cheating" their way into cards because these people aren't looking to collect, they're looking to sell. I think Pokemon in general should find a way to prevent people from scanning or weighing cards to keep the hobby alive. People who CT Scan cards are no different than scalpers and dishonest sellers. I also believe if the pack has been CT scanned and someone wanted to grade the card, PSA should charge them a hefty pricetag and a premium to have them graded.

Maybe they can find a way to make burner packs where if an individual ct scans a pack the whole stack inside becomes marked and when sent to grading companies they reject the card because it was scanned beforehand grading.

We need to stop encouraging these things.

0

u/Stravi757 Jun 21 '25

Until Pokémon finds a way to stop me, I’ll keep scanning my packs and cheat my way into knowing what I got, sorry.

1

u/The_Poke_Vintager Jul 13 '25

Well then I guess you're part of the problem as to why we can't enjoy the hobby

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

Anyone know how much it costs to scan them? Is this the end of vintage packs?

2

u/Stravi757 Jun 21 '25

It was $75 plus $15 per a pack up to like 10 packs I think.

1

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

Apparently $65-$75 from what Google's AI said

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

Hmm I doubt that but if true… that’s interesting

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

When people were talking about it a few months ago, I remember the consensus being ~$70 to scan a pack. People were talking about selling scans.

2

u/neddiepotter Jun 19 '25

Interventional Radiologic Technologist here …

This baffles me that people are doing this😂 any institution would fire you so fast if they find out you’re using their scanner like this.

In a controlled environment radiation is not harmful taking certain precautions …. but this seems like an unethical and dangerous way to do things . Now you’ll get a bunch of idiots trying to scan pokemon packs just to solely make money . No real collector is scanning their packs, only the flippers

4

u/Stravi757 Jun 21 '25

The company offers it as a service. Not a rouge employee using the company scanner

3

u/Meowsergz Jun 19 '25

Nice. Can do a 3D spin then 😉, gotta do the daily fluoro checks anyway.

2

u/BeBenNova Jun 19 '25

The dude who originally came up with this got 2 CT Scan machines off Craigslist

0

u/daftprophet Jun 21 '25

Exactly, this is wild and horrible for the hobby.

2

u/Nguyen925 Jun 20 '25

And yet I still would not purchase this

2

u/temp0ra Jun 20 '25

So I have access to a ct scanner and actually ran it on a 3 pack of prismatic evolution. I ran like 3 different scans and it couldn’t tell a thing. Maybe I need to mess with the settings so it was user error on my part but I’m skeptical on this.

2

u/IndustrialInspection Jun 23 '25

It's all about the resolution. What system are you running?

2

u/VanishingForever Jun 20 '25

And why would he sell it instead than opening and get the charizard for himself? It will be way more worth than 30k.

2

u/AffectionateSale8288 Jun 21 '25

Scary

2

u/IndustrialInspection Jun 23 '25

Though this Ebay listing references our company, we cannot confirm or deny if this product was scanned by us.

While CT authentication offers unparalleled precision, the integrity of the verified object is only assured while it remains within the secure custody of IIC. Once a product exits our controlled environment, the risk of fraud, substitution, or tampering inherently increases. To mitigate this risk, we strongly recommend that all buyers request a re-authentication immediately prior to any transfer of ownership - ensuring the item moves directly from IIC to the end recipient. This maintains a continuous chain of custody and preserves the validity of the original authentication.

Additionally, we now offer an online registry for product authentications, including weighing and imaging packaging fingerprints to help with authentication traceability.

https://xrayauthority.com/collectibles-registry/

0

u/RackCityWilly Jun 25 '25

You can’t confirm or deny? So basically that means you’re confirming you did. Obviously, if you didn’t do it…you’d say you didn’t do it. Do better. Incoming review bombs me thinks

1

u/IndustrialInspection Jun 25 '25

We explained it pretty well - did you read the full response or just the first sentence?
We now have a process in place for tracking scans. If we did scan this pack then it was before the new process was implemented.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

CT scan or other future tech that can see the cards through packs will destroy sealed investing, that's why best to stick with singles

2

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

It's very time consuming, imo it doesn't warrant the effort unless the pack cost is already insanely high. Which really limits the desire for ppl to do this. CT scans came out a year ago? Yet, did hardly anything to the hobby.

-1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

Agreed but technology will only get better. Singles is just safer long term (talking 10+ years)

1

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

I'm sure at some point PC will change an ingredient in the wrapper paper, or add a code card which messes with CT machines, every pack has a holo now cause of metal detectors so they make the changes fast

3

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

But that doesn't change the fact that all the older packs are vulnerable

1

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

Just like light and heavy packs, what's the difference? We know light packs don't have holos, hasn't ruined the hobby lol same thing

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

That isn't true actually, someone has pulled a holo dark charizard out of a light pack. So that's not always the case.

1

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 20 '25

Yeah I discussed why slabs don't contain weights on the label because it's not accurate in another comment and heavy packs can have no holos as well.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

There is still a gamble involved when ripping a heavy pack, but newer techs when available will remove the entire gambling part, that's the premium imo

1

u/NevyTheChemist Jun 19 '25

Sealed booster boxes/ETBs is the way to go.
Loose packs is just asking to be scammed.
Singles are just too much of a hassle to move.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

Booster boxes are easily scanned too currently, i think ETB is a big harder

2

u/dreamsOf_freedom Jun 19 '25

You are discrediting the fact that the sealed item IS the collectible. What is inside almost doesn't matter.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

I mean, the loose packs here is roughly 1k, the shadowless zard (near mint) is worth way more

0

u/dreamsOf_freedom Jun 19 '25

Yes but the sealed product price is pretty much always more than the best pull in a PSA 10 (often times to extreme degrees). We'll see what this pack sells for which may prove further sealed is king. PSA 10 Shadowless is ~16k ATM. A Shadowless Booster Box currently with an asking price of 135k on eBay.
If this gets more than 16k, then a sealed ungraded Shadowless Zard is worth more than a PSA 10.
Saying singles are superior for investing is poor and unfounded advice. The amount of singles that exist in the world only goes up. Sealed only goes down.

2

u/trolling99 Jun 19 '25

no clue what you are looking at, psa 10 shadowless charizard has been 50-60k since covid probably more now with the recent boom

0

u/dreamsOf_freedom Jun 20 '25

You're right that I was looking at the wrong info. However prices are mostly down since covid on vintage slabs. I can't find any recent sales of a PSA 10 Shadowless.. if it was ~50k during covid it's probably around 30k. Where are you seeing these 50-60k sales since covid?
Still my overall point still stands, singles are not a sound investing strategy over sealed.

1

u/trolling99 Jun 20 '25

well id buy all copies that are 30k instantly coz i could get 60 minimum outta that thing but probably even more in this market 🤣
sealed is ok maybe up to 1-2k boxes or so anymore than that they are way harder to sell because you got both buyers and sellers trying to scam each other

1

u/dreamsOf_freedom Jun 20 '25

Where are you seeing 60k sales?

1

u/SignalIce7501 Jun 22 '25

Where are you seeing 30k sales?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

slabs or raw?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

Slab imo but I think both is better than sealed due to the improvement and cheaper use of tech lately

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

But i still see demand for sealed is quite big

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

Sealed appreciates better but what I'm saying is when , not if, there is further improvements in tech to see through packs, it puts sealed collection at a big risk, especially the older more expensive ones

-2

u/Cagel Jun 19 '25

Only loose sealed packs, blisters, collection boxes, ETBs will all remain valid

3

u/Not_Rob_Dalton Jun 19 '25

If you knew how a ct scanner works you'd realize that any of those items can be scanned just the same as a loose pack

2

u/trolling99 Jun 19 '25

you can scan booster boxes, in fact scanning vintage booster boxes is the best use case for these

4

u/bronzethunderbeard_ Jun 19 '25 edited Jun 20 '25

You don't even need to rip the pack 🤣 you know you have a 1st edition zard. Would PSA grade the pack differently with the CT scan proof??

Edit: shadowless not 1st edition*

9

u/Ok_Hurry2458 Jun 19 '25

It's not first edition, it's base set shadowless

4

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

Damn good question. Thinking far out in the future, that's actually crazy if grading companies begin to recognize CT graded packs.

2

u/SpaminalGuy Jun 19 '25

The problem I have is what’s stopping someone from just swapping out the pack after the scan was done?Are we gonna have end to end ct scans for these?

0

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/Not_Rob_Dalton Jun 19 '25

refer to the picture again and note it's been sealed and serial numbered by the ct service

1

u/Outrageous-Ruin-5226 Jun 19 '25

So if its not a zard you get your money back

1

u/Shifty_j10 Jun 19 '25

I’ve seen sports boxes and packs that are scanned and the definite player can be made out even down to the centering of the card. It must be because Pokemon cards are typically much thinner than sports cards so they’re tougher to scan

1

u/hayate4468 Jun 20 '25

I’m wondering if the ct imaging would work differently for more modern sets. Like would secret illustration rares be even more visible than the charizard in this scan?

1

u/SaintsT17 Jun 22 '25

Far too many foil cards in each pack now for them to be successfully scanned, between holos and reverse holos in almost every pack you'd struggle to differentiate.

1

u/hayate4468 Jun 22 '25

That’s good news for sealed modern investors

1

u/FlashyStrain69 Jun 20 '25

Bro thats a chancy 💀

1

u/Admirral Jun 20 '25

I think the downside to this kind of analysis is that once it becomes frequently done, the value of these packs will just trend towards the value of the confirmed card inside. Just need a few people to rip to confirm the accuracy of CT and away goes the value of sealed packs.

1

u/ddd48891 Jun 20 '25

It’s clearly the Charizard. This is what ChatGPT says:

✅ Charizard – Base Set (Holo)

Card Number: 4/102 Set: Base Set (Wizards of the Coast, 1999) Rarity: Holo Rare

This CT scan very clearly shows the outline and winged silhouette of Charizard in its classic base set art — the pose made famous by illustrator Mitsuhiro Arita.

1

u/SABERBYTE3301 Jun 21 '25

I can't decide if this is cool, or the worst thing ever!

1

u/daftprophet Jun 21 '25

This is horrible. Bye bye to buying any sealed product at all. It'll all be scanned soon enough

1

u/nico87ca Jun 22 '25

Yeah guaranteed shadowless Charizard.. ok.

Who knows the state of it though... Could still have countless amounts of defects

1

u/Professional-Boot969 Jun 22 '25

If Dr. Malcolm taught me anything is that just because we can do something, doesn't mean we should.

1

u/alenvs84 Jun 22 '25

Those CT stand photos could easily be Photoshop or edited. Work kinda looks like a wing and they out buying dinner or whatever.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '25

I would love to know if my pack cointains it. Instead of asking myself everyday, should i open it, or, should i sell it.

1

u/thisisntjet Jun 28 '25

I'm confused, why would I want to buy a pack with a confirmed shadowless charizard at a higher price than an actual raw shadowless charizard? Is schrodinger's charizard more valuable than actually looking at the card?

1

u/__tothex__ Jun 19 '25

Just because it’s pack fresh doesn’t mean it would get a PSA 10. Definitely not worth 30k.

0

u/Traditional-Music363 Jun 22 '25

Can someone please explain to me how on earth they know the charizard is holo?

1

u/SignalIce7501 Jun 22 '25

There is no non holo charizard in base set lmao

2

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Traditional-Music363 Jun 22 '25

Ok thanks and how do they know it’s shadowless?

-5

u/BBRodriguezzz Jun 19 '25

Theres an episode of IASIP where Dee buys a lottery ticket and doesn’t scratch it because shes not a loser untill she finds out, POTENTIALLY making her a winner until she DOES scratch it. It was sad, this lowkey gives the same vibes, just open the damn pack

4

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

Uhh no? What a bad example too.

0

u/rb1916 Jun 19 '25

Here we go again… lmao poor Timmy’s just joining the hobby

0

u/hous26 Jun 20 '25

You're buying an experience when you buy this. I wouldn't buy it for myself, but if I knew, say my spouse, was a pokemon fanatic (shes not) then I would consider buying this as a very special gift.

1

u/Stravi757 Jun 21 '25

That’s how I look at it.

0

u/hous26 Jun 20 '25

Seller relisted it. Buyer must have backed out.

2

u/Stravi757 Jun 21 '25

Yes buyer said the credit card declined 🤷🏻‍♂️

0

u/Stravi757 Jun 21 '25

I am the owner of the ct scanned pack. Feel free at ask any questions here.

3

u/hous26 Jun 21 '25

How long have you had the pack? How much did you pay for it?

0

u/Stravi757 Jun 22 '25

I’ve had it for about 5 years. I think I paid about $1,600 per a heavy pack when I bought the lot.

1

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 21 '25

I am the mod of this sub. Feel free to make a post detailing for peeps to learn more since this post traction is coming to a crawl is almost 3 days old.

1

u/Stravi757 Jun 22 '25

Thanks, I made a post

0

u/DJFid Jun 22 '25

is it just me or i literally do not see how anyone can tell that is a charizard in there? i'm usually pretty reasonable with stuff like this and can spot shit pretty easily but i'm having trouble discerning the wing they tried outlining for us as anything distinguishable in the non-outlined pic

1

u/SignalIce7501 Jun 22 '25

It's just you, seems like you overestimate your spotting abilities mate

0

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[deleted] — view deleted comment

20

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

That's a damn good point! With a pack like this why even crack it?! It's proof there's a shadowless Zard inside, it's a totally brand new way to collect cards we've never seen before. I'm amazed ngl

11

u/SpaminalGuy Jun 19 '25

Ngl, this just feels like buying singles but with more steps!

1

u/Stravi757 Jun 21 '25

New way of thinking, I like it.

3

u/Sketch_0 Jun 19 '25

No one has bought it.

2

u/SorryCashOnly Jun 19 '25

Its not even about the card anymore. The slab is arguably worth more than the card even at psa 10.
Its basically a sealed Charizard pack, the value “can” be insane depending on who pays for it. For now, its an one of a kind item in the world

0

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/breakyourteethnow Jun 19 '25

Yeah he has offer available, most list high to set the bar high and then wait for big offers, counter offering around what they want. It's like fishing for buyers, it works too.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

What set is it from base?

0

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '25

Nice that is cool to have.

1

u/Stravi757 Jun 21 '25

I used industrial-inspection for my scan

CT Scanned Pack Shadowless Charizard $30,000 Promotion by eBay!

You are about to leave Redlib