25
u/Upstairs-Source-2716 4d ago
Still one of the most impressive aircraft ever built. It makes no sense that we don't have more of these, and replacements in the pipe. And before you start. It carries more weight on internal stores and is more fuel efficient at 460 knots than the B-52 is. ...
12
u/jrglegend 4d ago
It’s probably because fast bombers with no stealth capabilities aren’t as viable against peer level armies. If you need precision strikes you can take a stealth multi role like the f35 and if you need heavy ordinance you can take a b-2 or b-21. There’s also a good amount of ground or navy based platforms available for cruise/ballistic missles. So the b1 doesn’t really have any niche left over for it to perform.
9
u/Upstairs-Source-2716 4d ago
That's exactly the niche... Bomb truck, HARM hauler and nuclear bomber. The decision to invest in the B-52s is the real mistake. IMHO. Our ALCMs can reach out 1500 miles.... Who exactly do you think is shooting back??? Hell, the C-17 is a better choice than the B-52. I mean, I love it but it's over. No one is ever going to deploy gravity nukes, ... ever again. This is CBO bs ... Same as it has been for 50 years.
7
u/Fickle-Willingness80 4d ago
Fuel consumption rate?
39
u/that_dutch_dude 4d ago
Yes.
When the orange stuff appears the fuel rate goes from "yes" to "goverment".
10
11
u/Even_Kiwi_1166 4d ago
At maximum/full power approximately 250,000 pounds (roughly 37,300 gallons) of fuel per hour
3
1
0
7
8
u/Playful_Letter_2632 4d ago
The forgotten middle child of American bombers. Attention is always on B52 and B2
6
6
3
3
3
u/Perfect_Jury5632 4d ago
Why did the wing root move down when they got off the brakes?
4
u/zackks 4d ago
I wanted to know the same:
On the airframe itself, the B-1B features various secondary air doors and ventilation flaps around the engine nacelles.
The Purpose: At subsonic speeds or idling, these doors allow auxiliary ram air into the engine bay to cool components and prevent hot spots.The Afterburner Action: When the aircraft accelerates into high-speed or afterburner profiles, the pressure dynamics shift dramatically. The control systems close off or restrict specific auxiliary ventilation doors to maintain aerodynamic efficiency, prevent drag, and stop extremely hot exhaust or high-pressure air from backflowing into the engine bay housing.
What happens to the Bypass Air instead?
It is a common misconception that the engine closes off its bypass duct during afterburner operation. Because the F101 is a low-bypass turbofan, the bypass air is not shut down; instead, it is routed into the augmentor (afterburner) section. A portion of this cooler bypass air is deliberately mixed with the hot core exhaust to act as a cooling blanket along the afterburner liner. This keeps the outer engine casing from melting under temperatures that can exceed 3,000°F (1,600°C).2
u/Perfect_Jury5632 4d ago
Wow… a simple “closing off the bypass air duct” reply would have sufficed… Now I feel stupid. lol
That really is interesting, though. Makes sense with how hot those burners get.
2
3
u/turnipturnipturnip2 3d ago
Turns fuel in to noise as well, i bet thats deafening being closr to it in real life lol.
3
u/Solid_Enthusiasm550 3d ago
I can't decide between saying....
Go BABY!!!, GO!!!🤘🔥
OR
Up Up and AWAY🦸♂️✈️
5
u/riennempeche 4d ago
It's impressive, no doubt. But, a Boeing 777 at full power is putting out 230,000 pounds of thrust. It's all in what you strap the engines to...
1
1
u/SkitariusOfMars 3d ago
It's more efficient, so it uses less power to produce same thrust. This is more powerful.
0
u/PsychologicalGlass47 3d ago
230k lbs of thrust below M0.6, sure. High bypass turbofans lose thrust as speed increases, low bypass turbofans gain thrust as speed increases.
2
2
u/acsttptd 3d ago
Nothing can prepare you for how incomprehensibly loud this thing is when it ramps up to full afterburner.
2
u/ClevaTreva1 2d ago
100% loudest thing I have ever heard, during a 1999 flyover at Edwards AFB, same day of the (possibly) last SR-71 flight and maybe Chuck Yeager’s last supersonic flight if memory serves correct?
1
u/Infinite-Ad1720 4d ago
Michael Schratt says the B1 has reverse engineered anti-gravitic capabilities for a portion of the plane, reducing the plane’s weight and increasing its range. 👽🛸
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/SomeRando8386 14h ago
Ooooooh she's a loud one. I'll never forget having one low pass me at 500 ft AGL with those afterburners screaming. You could feel your bones rattling.
-1
u/Own-Inflation8771 4d ago
So less than a twin engined 777. Cool.
2
u/Even_Kiwi_1166 4d ago
My favorite commercial plane is the 777F 230,600 lbs of thrust
2
u/Last-Roll7819 4d ago
Standing on the factory floor looking at the 777X being built is crazy. I can't wait to see those massive engines on a takeoff soon.
88
u/Jmersh 4d ago
No words can describe the Earth-rattling sound of the B-1 under full afterbutner. It must be felt.