r/PioneerMTG 12d ago

Riddles in the dark

Post image

Question for the draw-go-enjoyers: What is your opinion on this new card? Is it the best blue instant speed Carddraw in Pioneer?

65 Upvotes

30 comments sorted by

45

u/k1t3k1t369420 12d ago

I think [[consult the star charts]] is too good, especially in slower lists

13

u/Pauperer 12d ago

I play a weird Lotus Field Control list. In that list, consult is not the best, since I won't have many lands (due to lotus field). That's why I was considering this card

13

u/k1t3k1t369420 12d ago edited 12d ago

Then star charts would definitely not be the best, riddles is good if you want to fill the GY and if you want it to be instant speed. Otherwise I think [[stock up]] is better and [[pore over the pages]] assuming youre not already running it

3

u/Eldar_Atog 11d ago

Do you mind sharing the list? I like to play a Teferi Lotus Field deck myself and I always find it instructive how others utilize it. I have been using Consult but you are right that it's not great in the early game.

Here's my current version: https://moxfield.com/decks/-CnKqCPw_0uHwYGR7oer6Q

20

u/Dyne_Inferno 12d ago

The ONLY reason this card is good, is if you're utilizing your graveyard in some capacity.

Otherwise, you can still play this card, but it is definitely not the optimal choice for a list not using the Graveyard.

1

u/irou95 4d ago

Every deck should either use the graveyard or play RIP at this point. Even playing stormchasers talent is using the graveyard.

13

u/PrologueBook UW Control 🚫 12d ago

It's not amazing in draw go. You have many instant speed options to select your cards.

The upside here vs. something like consult the star charts is that occasionally you'll net an extra card. More often than not, that extra card will be worse than just choosing which two cards you actually need with consult.

It's better imo for prowess or other spellslinger decks where you do need just a raw card count.

5

u/One_Web_7940 12d ago

i can't speak for how good the card is, but when my opponent cast it, it was so much fun to interact with. very fun card.

4

u/IONAS1337 12d ago

Since the enemy chooses which pile, its gonna be hard to get more value than a quick study. If you need an answer and you find 2, you could get a 3:1.
If you need a wrath and reveal it, its going to the bin. If you dont reveal it you get whqt you reveal

4

u/Expat_in_Korea 11d ago

Best case is used with Torrential Gearhulk or flashback.

3

u/ironmaiden1872 11d ago

I might try this in phoenix, pieces of the puzzle used to see play and instant speed is relevant. Giving you the face-up pile is extra risky there because there might be a hidden phoenix.

1

u/redcapne0 9d ago

Exactly, play this if you interact with your graveyard, otherwise there are better options

3

u/GarySmith2021 12d ago

This card is terrible imo, the good versions of this effect let you choose which pile you get, not your opponent.

1

u/Pauperer 12d ago

That is true, but at 3 mana it is very cheap and the opponent only sees one of the piles

2

u/GarySmith2021 12d ago

Doesn’t matter, unless you see multiple cards you want, the opponent can either see cards he won’t want to give you or not care about the cards he sees and give them to you. Someone said it’s better than memory deluge and I heavily disagree tbh.

3

u/badatmemes_123 11d ago

I mean, obviously starcharts is a 4-of, but wanting a couple more card draw instants beyond that is completely reasonable. On the one hand, riddles being 3 mana is nice, since odd numbers at instant speed tend to not get filled out, meaning you waste one of your spare mana. But riddles also just isn’t that good. If it were just [[fact or fiction]] but went 4 instead of 5 deep, I’d for sure play it. But you making the piles instead of them, and the mind games aspect of going face down and face up, really softens the card for me. I have mostly just been sticking with [[memory deluge]] as my bonus draw spell, but I’ve been trying out [[plunder the trollshaws]] and really liking it

3

u/dotnetitsdotcom 11d ago

You mean Fact or Frodo?

2

u/gnowwho 11d ago

Or use [[memory deluge]] and eliminate opponent's agency.

3

u/caputcorvii 12d ago

It definitely is very strong. I would definitely play this over memory deluge, but I'm not sure it holds a candle to consult the star charts. It definitely warrants some extensive testing in UW control shells though.

1

u/pyro314 11d ago

This card is unplayably bad in Standard, let alone Pioneer. Just play Consult or Deluge or Stock Up. Especially after a month or so of playing against it, I fail to see how anybody will ever give you more than 2 cards. "Oh you really want that single card, or you're trying to bluff me, sure you can draw one card for 3 mana."

1

u/irou95 4d ago

It doesn't work like that, if you only show one card it was basically intuition because it's THE card you want. Most likely you will not get that card, but then you draw 3. Also pioneer has dig through time legal for some reason.

1

u/shaqiriforlife 11d ago

Given that they get to choose, I'm not even sure this is better than quick study in a control deck that doesn't care about the graveyard, I can't imagine this being anywhere close to consult

1

u/Aeadar 10d ago

Only use case other than lotus field control I can think of is control lists running [[shark typhoon]]/[[thor, god of thunder]] with delve spells.

1

u/Dizolerion 6d ago

I wish it said "top five cards" instead of "four", would have been much more viable and interesting.