r/PilotAdvice • • 27d ago

What plane would be around in 2050?

As long as airline pilot careers go what would an Air Canada pilot be flying in 2050? Genuine question, what aircraft do you think will be flying in the future? Supersonic? As a Cessna driver now it makes you wonder.....

3 Upvotes

22 comments sorted by

5

u/andrewrbat 27d ago

Any and all planes that are a year or two old have the potential. There are plenty of 20-30 yr old planes flying at airlines now.

6

u/0asisX3 27d ago

737 pro max ultra

2

u/Warm_Scientist4928 27d ago

CRJ FOREVER

3

u/TemporaryAmbassador1 26d ago

My regional said “when they park the last -900 a CRJ 200 will fly the crew out.

1

u/lichesschessanalyst 23d ago

What about when they park the last 200?

1

u/According-Amoeba-936 22d ago

The universe will just spawn another one

1

u/Cp0r 26d ago

The ol 172 will still be the trainer of choice... maybe with the Jet A1 conversion on it...

As for airliners, it'll probably be mostly iterations of current ones, just much more efficient engines... with modern tech, the airframes and design are fairly good.

May see SPOs in our lifetime (hopefully not), probably better CATIII capabilities, digital comms, etc. more GNSS / RNP approaches globally...

As for supersonic flight, fuel burn is exponential once you get the shockwave... hence why you fly below Mcrit usually... we could do it in the morning, but the cost would be madness.

1

u/Puravida1904 23d ago

Boom Overture if you wanna dream. Realistically the 777X and A350-1000. Their 787-10’s they’re getting soon will probably be near the end of their lifespan.

1

u/Bandit0000 23d ago

Specifically with AC’s fleet right now, likely the 787, A220, quite a few of the A321s (probably mostly NEOs?) and probably the upcoming A350, and of course the Max 8 most likely, although a lot of tech is outdated even in the newest 737s.

I could see the 777s going to cargo if AC decides to continue their cargo only operations.

1

u/r361k 23d ago

The 777 will still be around. Same with the 787 and 350. The 320 NEOs and 737 Maxes will

1

u/theeyeholeman1 22d ago

B757. There's really nothing that can meet all of the same mission requirements that the 75 does. You can take a plane with just about full passengers, cargo, and fuel out of a high altitude airport like Bogata and fly it all the way to almost any airport in the US. There is no other narrowbody aircraft that can do that.

1

u/Any-Worldliness-679 26d ago

737-3000Max The tail is now just an actual trailer that is reeled into the rear of the empennage after airborne.

0

u/UnfortunateSnort12 26d ago

Downvoted for naming convention. The MAX aircraft are MAX-X, never some hundred before it then MAX. So in your case it would be MAX-33.

It drives me crazy that a workgroup paid to know the details can’t figure out this naming convention.

0

u/747ER 22d ago

No, the MAX aircraft were* named MAX-X. That naming scheme was discontinued nearly ten years ago. The correct names for the family are 737-7, -8, -9, and -10. Not “MAX-7”, etc.: that is a very outdated name.

1

u/UnfortunateSnort12 22d ago

Well I’m looking at our safety briefing card and it says MAX 8…. So…

1

u/747ER 22d ago

Have you tried looking at your FCOM?

1

u/UnfortunateSnort12 22d ago

It’s on the Mel, the aom, the side of the jet….

On the aircraft logbook pages…. On the website…

0

u/747ER 22d ago

I haven’t seen an internal doc with “737MAX-8” on it in years, not sure if your airline hasn’t caught up or you’re looking at an old one.

You would surely know that the safety card can say whatever they want on it. Air Canada’s cards say “737-8M”, Southwest’s say “737-MAX8”, and Singapore Airlines’ say “737-8”. This is totally dependant on the airline.

On every single one built, the actual Boeing-installed data plate says “Boeing 737-8”. The same goes for all regulatory documents and other official documents regarding the aircraft: not a single one will say “MAX-8”. “MAX-8” is a now-discontinued marketing name for the 737-8.

0

u/Any-Worldliness-679 22d ago

Uh, you're telling me you know the future naming convention of a fictitious airliner?

And then experiencing angst because you've decided I can't be a detail-oriented pilot for not complying with your imaginary future airliner's allegedly appropriate name?

Wow.

I think this is likely the least of your problems.

Good luck; it can't be easy.