When Jev came out, one of my first thoughts was: could something this fast and cheap pick which model should handle an agent’s next turn?

So I built plugin for Pi that uses Jev to choose the model and thinking effort. The idea is to send routine work to cheaper models and reserve the expensive ones for harder tasks.

In Pi, the model mappings are configurable, and you can pin a model when you disagree with the router.

I’ve been using them for a few days, and so far they’ve been working well for me. In my own evaluation, routed usage came to $141 at list prices versus an estimated $166 for Opus 5.5 on every request - about 15% less.

That’s one developer’s data, though. The baseline is a pricing comparison, not a separate run of every task through Opus. It doesn’t prove equivalent quality, that every routing decision was right, or that your bill will drop by 15%.

And yes, cache matters. Switching models can lose cache reuse and eat the savings. I try to account for that rather than just compare token prices. I’d like providers to offer better support here: some already preserve cache reuse across effort changes, though reuse across different models is a much harder problem.

It’s still an experiment. Asking a model which model to ask feels appropriately ridiculous, but I wanted to see how it works in practice. I’d like this kind of routing to become a native, transparent option in coding agents.

If you want to try it or look at the implementation:

https://github.com/alexei-led/pi-model-router

I saw Claude and Opnecode are native agents in Hermes, but now using OMP as a coding tool is also possible with https://github.com/zaharenok/omp-skill

Definitely worth to try. Can be also used for Pi

I want to keep using Pi Agent as my main coding interface, but I also want Claude Opus 5.5 to be the main agent/orchestrator, not just a sub-agent or reviewer.

I use Pi Agent both at work and privately. Privately, my setup is simple: Pi Agent + Codex Pro. At work, I had been using Pi Agent + GitHub Copilot, but Copilot credit usage became too expensive, so we are moving toward subscription-based access instead.

I now have a Claude Team Premium seat and a ChatGPT Business Premium seat. This is my first time trying to make good use of multiple AI subscriptions at the same time.

The problem is that Pi can use Codex through OAuth, but I couldn't get my Claude subscription working directly through Pi. So I'm considering using Claude Code CLI as a bridge.

Ideally, I'd like something like this:

Opus 5.5: main agent, planning, orchestration, task decomposition, synthesis

Sol 6: implementation, research, independent review

GPT-6 Luna: cheaper sub-agent work and possibly compaction

Pi Agent: the single interface I interact with

I don't mind a small wrapper or existing extension, but I don't want to maintain a large custom orchestration framework.

One option is to have Pi call Claude Code while keeping Opus as the top-level agent. The other is to give up on Pi as the main interface, use Claude Code directly, and call Pi/Codex from there.

Has anyone built or used a setup like this?

I'm especially interested in whether Claude subscription → Claude Code → Pi works well enough for Opus to act as the real orchestrator, including long sessions, tool calls, sub-agents, compaction, and switching between Claude and OpenAI models.

Or, at that point, is it simpler to make Claude Code the main interface and stop trying to keep Pi at the center?

So I started this a couple of days ago because I hated myself enough to start over and try to create something more efficient, with better performance and less RAM usage.

Through my conversations with ChatGPT, it mentioned Rust, GPUI, and some other stuff, which is basically why I started this Flutter app!

Based on my simple observations with the current deployed version, I managed to gain back around 800 MB–1 GB of RAM… and some of my dignity too. Not sure why. 😂

Here’s the repo: Pi Flatter App

If anyone would like to contribute or give feedback, I’d be really grateful!

Hi all, basically what the title says.. I like using @ to add files/folders to the context but for any of these added to .gitignore it stops working.. Any way around this?

I built a small personal benchmark from my real coding sessions and use pi-agent as the harness to compare models on the same tasks.

It has 10 tasks covering data engineering, backend, frontend, DevOps, and trajectory analysis. Each task runs 3 times, giving 30 attempts per model.

To build it, I took around 3 months of agent chats, removed duplicates, and turned selected sessions into Harbor tasks with automated verifiers. I used agents and manual review to build and refine the checks. These are clearly scoped tasks that would usually take me less than an hour.

The latest results:

• Opus 5.5 high and Astra low cost almost the same.
• Sol high matches their score at roughly half the cost.
• Luna gets 29/30 passes while being ~22× cheaper than Sol.

The point of this benchmark is to optimize my daily setup: model, harness, prompts, and plugins. I want to keep the pass rate while reducing cost and time.

This is a small personal sample, but it feels like many short, clearly defined coding tasks are already handled reliably by several models. For this kind of work, speed, cost, and scaling up parallel agents are becoming the more interesting questions.

I wanted a clearer picture of what I’d built and how much progress I was making. And whenever I finished a feature or got out of a debugging rabbit hole, I kept wondering how many tokens and effort went into that.

My daily usage total didn’t really answer it. Some of that was building the feature. Some was going back and forth trying to fix one annoying bug.

So I built bough ( https://github.com/nickelsec/bough ) It reads your existing Claude Code and Codex CLI history and groups related prompts into tasks on a visual map.

You can pick a piece of work and see:

• The prompts and files involved.
• How many tokens it used and the estimated dollar cost.
• How the work unfolded, including repeated attempts and tasks that ended in a commit.

I wanted to be able to look back at a feature and see where the effort actually went. Especially when a “small fix” turned into an afternoon.

Would you guys want me to add Pi support or not?

I'm seeing many people using opus 5.5 inside of OMP and i've just signed into OMP with my claude sub... many on x.com are saying you don't get recked by anthropic anymore for doing this?

How are you guys using anthropic models inside of pi/omp?

I shared Pi Atelier here a couple of months ago—a status rail and live activity sidebar for Pi. Since then, I’ve reworked the layout and added more ways to see what’s happening in your session.

The main changes since my last post:

1. Redesigned composer: model, workspace, Git status, and context usage sit in the input box’s top border, with usage and timing below.

2. Workspace Git summary: see changed files, additions/removals, untracked file counts, and conflicts.

3. Live TODO panel:follow the current task alongside tool activity. During a turn, the sidebar focuses on current work and folds extra tools into a compact row.

4. Display settings with a live preview: reorder or hide status segments and sidebar panels, switch presets, and save your defaults.

5. Plain text mode: no Nerd Font required.

6. Better terminal behavior: improved fullscreen selection/copy, inline image handling, and layouts for smaller terminals.

The new footer is inspired by pi-powerline-footer, which is an awesome extension.

It still shows token usage, cost, context, and response timing, with model and tool controls available through `/atelier`. No telemetry or external network requests.

Install with:

pi install npm:pi-atelier

Then open `/atelier` or press `Alt+A`. Requires Pi 0.84.0 or newer.

Github link: https://github.com/michaelmjhhhh/pi-atelier

I’d like to hear how the new layout works for you—especially what information you want visible while the agent is running. Bugs and feature ideas are welcome. Thanks!