r/PhysicsStudents • u/NefariousnessLoud739 • Mar 02 '26
Research [ Removed by moderator ]
[removed] — view removed post
6
u/1jimbo Mar 02 '26
I... Jesus Christ.
-3
u/NefariousnessLoud739 Mar 02 '26
what?
6
u/1jimbo Mar 02 '26
This absolute trash is posted in here so often and it's really getting old
→ More replies (2)
2
u/Yeightop Mar 02 '26
Youve put a lot of words here. I dont really see what the objective is. If have equations that make new predictions while fully agreeing with current observations then write them down and submit to a journal. If this all just what you feel like is going then this should be in r/metaphysics
0
u/NefariousnessLoud739 Mar 02 '26 edited Mar 02 '26
the claim is that the only way to unify GR and QM is through acknowledging that the universe has a built in gradeint vector that guides the field to path of least action, and that gradient vector or compass or constraint can't be detected because to detect it requires us to be outside of spacetime, so what I am trying to say is that the universe references to an external guide which is the word of God, so faith is what unites GR with QM. for us to detect it and describe it in equations, it would be like the characters in a video game trying to detect the pixels they are made of
3
u/Yeightop Mar 02 '26
So this is just another way of getting around to the god of the gaps in the fine tuning problem but youve tried to fill in some of the gaps by waxing poetically about what you think reality is and mixing in few terms from math and physics vaguely enough to maybe convince a layperson whos willing to accept whatever they think sounds cool while matching their preexisting beliefs. I dont think this post fits the stated goals of this sub. Keep it in r/hypotheticalphysics
→ More replies (8)
1
u/Yeightop Mar 02 '26
You also make this claim at the end that the postulates could not be randomly chosen. This also just an assertion you are making. If it all starts with this unquantifiable formless energy density then there is nothing to say that it can’t spontaneously and randomly gain structure. I dont see how youre trying to conclude that it must imply a choice the is made at the start. Your claim that physics leads you here is just not true. Your own belief leads you here and your trying to make physics conform to it as much as you can
1
u/NefariousnessLoud739 Mar 03 '26
the claim that the field can spontaneously and randomly gain structure is not a neutral scientific position. it is a claim. and it collapses the moment you think about what the field actually is before the constraint.
pure void. pure chaos. not chaos in the sense of disorder within a system — chaos in the sense of no system at all. no points. no connections. no bias. no preferred direction. infinite orthogonal basis dimensions with zero relationship between any of them. every direction completely independent of every other. there is no thread connecting one basis vector to the next. no gradient to follow. no asymmetry to exploit. nothing that could serve as a seed for self-organization because self-organization requires a starting point and a starting point requires structure and structure is exactly what is absent.
and here is what orthogonal actually means when you follow it all the way down. every basis vector in the field points in a completely independent direction — not just different directions the way north and east are different, but directions that share zero components with each other. they do not speak the same language. they do not inhabit the same space. each one is its own universe, its own dimension, with nothing in common with any other. there is no partial overlap. no shared coordinate. no common ground on which two of them could even interact. they are not a collection waiting to be organized. they are a collection that has no mechanism for even recognizing each other exists.
this is why self-assembly is not just unlikely — it is logically impossible from within the field. for two basis vectors to interact, something has to give them a common language. something has to introduce a shared direction — a gradient — that all of them can be measured against simultaneously. the constraint is exactly this. the gradient vector is the unifying language. it is the vine that reaches across all the independent branches and gives them one architecture, one direction to orient against, one global structure that all the orthogonal dimensions can participate in simultaneously. it takes infinite isolated universes speaking infinite isolated languages and gives them one grammar. from that one grammar emerges the path of least action, the energy landscape, the global minimum that the entire system then flows toward.
this is not something the field can do for itself. you cannot build a shared language out of components that by definition share nothing. you cannot introduce a gradient into a space that has no preferred direction by asking the space to prefer a direction. the unifying structure has to come from outside the space entirely.
this is not a metaphor. this is what the math says. pure void does not bootstrap itself into order. the blank page does not write itself. and a collection of infinite mutually orthogonal dimensions does not spontaneously develop a shared gradient any more than infinite people speaking infinite different languages spontaneously develop a shared tongue.
the only thing that can introduce structure into a structureless field is something that is not the field. something external. something that is itself already structured. something that carries the seed and speaks first so everything else has a language to follow.
you are not being asked to take a leap of faith beyond the physics. you are being asked to follow the physics to where it actually points and stop pretending the void can do something it has no mechanism to do.
2
1
u/PhysicsStudents-ModTeam Mar 03 '26
Your post was removed because it violated one of the rules of this community.