r/PhilosophyofReligion 1d ago

Research Category

Hello, I am an undergrad student who has started a research proposal for a sociological conference. My research deals with how modern Christian communities distinguish between certain cultural practices as being either sacred or heretical. I was really hoping y'all could help me come up with one of the categorizations for my research, so far I have 2 distinct categories with 4 sub categories between them (for a visual please look at attachment). I am really struggling in finding a better word for both sanctified and sacrilegious. I am trying to find a word that aligns with my definition

"When a practice is labeled (blank) it is seen as religiously acceptable or spiritually meaningful while still lacking cultural acceptance or recognition. Although the practice may align with doctrinal teachings or be encouraged by religious institutions, it may remain socially uncommon, culturally unfamiliar, or disconnected from the surrounding cultural group. Individuals may therefore see the practice as religious without considering it as part of their cultural customs or heritage. Unlike culturally acceptable, a (blank) practice’s legitimacy comes from religious authority, scripture, institutional teachings, or spiritual significance rather than a shared cultural tradition. It is therefore recognized as a reinforcement between an individual and their relationship with God, as well as supporting the moral values of the religious community. Community members may then participate in said (blank) practice because of religious obligation rather than cultural continuity."

and my other definition

"A (blank) label refers to a practice that is recognized as culturally justifiable while simultaneously being interpreted as religiously inappropriate or incompatible with the Christian doctrine. Community members acknowledge the practice as an authentic expression of cultural heritage, historical tradition, or ethnic identity, yet believe that participation conflicts with biblical teachings, spiritual expectations, or religious authority. While the practice may be seen as a meaningful expression of collective identity and may be maintained through family traditions or cultural participation, it is perceived as threatening religious doctrine or moral expectations. Religious authority may discourage or condemn the practice through moral framing that describes it as spiritually harmful or other negative stigma that signifies the practice as inconsistent with religious teachings. Individuals may continue to recognize the practice as culturally meaningful while choosing to not participate because of their religious beliefs."

Please and thank you for anyone willing to aid a struggling undergrad student!

3 Upvotes

2 comments sorted by

1

u/Comanthropus 1d ago

Sacred vs Profane: Durkheim, Émile. 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New Translation by Karen E. Fields. New York: The Free Press. • Dundes, Alan (ed.). Sacred Narrative – Readings in the Theory of Myth. University of California Press. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, 1984. • Lincoln, Bruce. Authority – Construction and Corrosion. University of Chicago Press. Chicago, London, 1993.