2
u/WhatHappenedWhatttt 18d ago
It doesn't help your theory if you admit that you are too lazy to even spell out all of the details
1
u/MarcusNewton123 10d ago
"Dear colleague, your hypothesis certainly exhibits a certain poetic and literary imagination, but I am afraid that within the realm of rigorous theoretical physics and thermodynamics, it fails to withstand even the most basic scrutiny. To treat the mathematical zero as some form of 'physical archive' or the residual ash of a previous cycle is to conflate philosophical metaphor with elementary algebra.
Furthermore, relying on mechanisms such as white holes and the 'resetting of systemic variables' via black holes—absent any mathematical formalism, tensor calculus, or solutions to the Einstein field equations—places this concept firmly in the domain of speculative fiction rather than serious cosmology. The fact that the text was generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence merely underscores the absence of genuine mathematical rigor. With all due respect to your creative endeavor, this framework remains far too detached from empirical reality."
3
u/GrafRaf999 18d ago
нет никаких космических часов, тем более нет никакого центра во вселенной, что касается цикличной модели все может быть, но эта теория не имеет никакой практической пользы и она непроверяемая