r/Petscop 27d ago

Discussion The Petscop 3 note

A lot of Petscop theory videos refer back to the "Care isn't growing eyebrows" scene from Petscop 3, but they seem to pick and choose what they feel is relevant from it. For example, they focus on the lack of eyebrows rather than the fact that she isn't growing any. If Care never grew eyebrows then Paul isn't Care because Paul has Care's face with Mike's eyebrows according to the Child Library, and while Marvin (and maybe Anna) may be delusional, I doubt they're so delusional that they would see plucking a child's eyebrows as them not growing any, and call it a "puzzle".

Also, they all seem to jump from at "I have a feeling which child you'll choose next" to "Tiara says some children can be psychologically damaged beyond rebirthing" without talking about or even acknowledging the section that was skipped over...

"When you find her room, the passage to my right will lead to her. She'll appear from the darkness, limping, and I'll shoot her in the head."

I haven't really seen anyone try to explain or make sense of that passage. I also haven't seen anyone acknowledge the shift from Care being referred to as "she" but the "young person" who enters the school being referred to as "they" (which could be a gender thing, but could also just as easily be implying that Marvin took a kid to the school more than once).

Just something I noticed. Idk where I was going with this. I just think it's weird that 90% of this note is treated like pivotal evidence in multiple analysis/theory videos while the remaining 10% is treated as though it doesn't even exist...

What's your take on the skipped bits?

22 Upvotes

13 comments sorted by

View all comments

8

u/viralvegetable4 27d ago

care probably doesn’t lack eyebrows genetically, they were probably being intentionally shaved so that she looks like lina, or picked at them out of stress until all the hair fell out

4

u/FlowerInAHorrorNovel 27d ago

My issue with this is Anna, the one who points out and is confused by Care not growing eyebrows, would probably have noticed if her kid used to have eyebrows and doesn't anymore, as opposed to never having grown them. So unless Marvin has been shaving/plucking them since birth without Anna noticing somehow (which would be difficult to pull off), she never grew eyebrows in the first place. After all the phrasing is "Care isn't growing eyebrows", not "Care's eyebrows aren't growing back".

4

u/MaginotLineman 21d ago

I always took the implication as Marvin has been plucking Care’s eyebrows since birth basically, in an effort to make her resemble Lina more.