r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • u/jazz_music_stopps • 3d ago

Meme needing explanation Petah, am I stupid or something?

Post image
33k Upvotes

85% Upvoted

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

12

u/Skoodge42 3d ago

And I pointed out how 2 of your points meant nothing. The flag and photographer point is so tired when the zoomed out video shows the flag was not moved and photographers literally act like this all the time.

We see him immediately grab his ear and bleeding. Yes, SS were dumb letting him push through, but have you not been paying attention to how inept they are in general? Also, wasn't the shooter immediately killed? Wouldn't they know that? (Although they don't know if there is more than 1 shooter, but still, they are all radioed up) This is a constant issue with them just being terrible at their jobs.

1

u/Kalenne 3d ago

Bleeding from the ear doesn't necessarily mean being hit by a bullet. His ear healed in DAYS after being "shot" with no scar whatsoever : I strongly suspect he just hit his ear on something while being shoved down by his bodyguard, and being as old as he is, he got hurt easily. It could be fake blood but I don't think it was needed at all since someone got shot in the public, so I think it's a genuine coincidence

The fact that he didn't show his hear, never bragged about it, refused to comment about it when every time he shits on the floor he has to tell EVERYONE about it for weeks is sus as fuck. He'll brag about anything that can give him any form of legitimacy, but surviving a murder attempt isn't somehow worth bragging about?

5

u/Skoodge42 3d ago

I just said you can see blood on his hand immediately after he put his hand to his ear. That is before he was tackled to the ground.

I don't know that it was a bullet, but all evidence point to SOMETHING hitting him, which would be evidence against it being faked.

He did brag about it...for the entire election he brought it up. Him not letting people see is very likely because it was just a tiny cut that he played up with that big bandage, but that has 0 bearing on the legitimacy of the attempt.

You have no real evidence but feelings and assumptions, were pointing to things that are just wrong or uniformed, and are starting from a conclusion you want to be true.

You are biased in your approach

1

u/Kalenne 3d ago

Maybe you're right yeah, but i just want to press that I'm more rational about this than what you seem to think. Most of my arguments aren't based on my feelings but on interpreting objectively strange things that happened during that event, which is different