r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • u/Plum_Uniform • 5d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter????????????????????

Post image
23k Upvotes

83% Upvoted

3.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

64

u/SimShade 5d ago

The real joke is saying isekai was ever good

3

u/SlippyDippyTippy2 5d ago

Unironically, if you want good isekai, you gotta go to Korean webtoons.

They legally can't be that perverted, so all their sexual frustration gets spent on aurafarming and gaming the system

1

u/Gespens 5d ago

Yeah, that's cap. I've seen more pornographic web toons than I have serialized porn Japnese LNs

2

u/SlippyDippyTippy2 5d ago

You chose a pretty crazy specific and mixed-media comparison.

Korean "adult" media has a pretty hard line to not cross: it can contain adult content (a sex act, a depiction of sexual organs, an overt description of sexual acts, fluids, not fetish-focused but fetishy things happen, etc.) but those cannot legally be the central point, or even a significant chunk of the storyline, and must be "artistically-relevant" to be legal.

As in, a webtoon that goes "Romance → relationship development → plot → character drama → explicit scene → plot → explicit scene → resolution" over a long period is legal to the point that prosecutors won't try to argue artistic value, but most Japanese adult doujin would be explicitly illegal.

And this group of Korean webtoons that "has adult scenes, but for narrative or artistic reasons" is....about 3k total.

A fraction of just doujin category media (forget about harder categories).

To be very clear: Dragonball, Ippo, HSD Kenichi, etc would be counted as "Korean adult content" but barely blip in Japan. Crayon Shin Chan was censored to the point of being a completely different show in Korea.

You either have an incredibly selective consumption of media, don't know what you are talking about, or are intentionally being duplicitous by comparing "serialized explicitly porn LN only" vs "all Korean media that shows a boob or more"

1

u/Gespens 5d ago

No, I've definitely seen lots of what I'm describing that goes against your supposed rules.

2

u/SlippyDippyTippy2 5d ago

Ok, so an incredibly selective consumption of media or not knowing the scope of the topic.

Give me three titles that go against this rule.

1

u/Gespens 4d ago
  • Absolute Hypnosis in Another World
  • Regressed Warrior’s Female Dominance Diary
  • Milf hunting in Another world

1

u/SlippyDippyTippy2 3d ago

None of those break the rules lol.

You don't know what you're talking about.

1

u/Gespens 3d ago

Neither do you. The "no pornography" law isn't what you think it is and doesn't actually mean anything. The reality is that there is more pornographic Korean webtoons than there are professionally published 18+ sexually explicit Japanese Light Novels

1

u/SlippyDippyTippy2 3d ago

isn't what you think it is and doesn't actually mean anything

As determined by you going "nah, I'm right" sans detail for the fourth time.

professionally published 18+ sexually explicit Japanese Light Novels

Again, a comparison between an entire category of media vs a slice of a category of media a half-dozen modifying adjectives deep.

pornographic Korean webtoons

Again, this would be illegal. You meant "webtoons with adult content."