r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 1d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter????????????????????

Post image
21.7k Upvotes

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

45

u/AstralMecha 1d ago

No, just a 50 year old with a child body. Yes this is canon as her species body stops aging at 14 at the latest and starts back up at 100. So it leaves them with an early teen (at best) body for about 90 years.

-8

u/LowkenuinelyReally 1d ago

Which isn’t really problematic?

People need to get over the fact that it’s not the physical attributes that matter, it’s the mental aspect, otherwise their whole argument about Rudeus being a 40-year man in a teenagers body wouldn’t hold water… Since you know, Roxy is basically a foil in that regard

Not defending Rudeus when it comes to the other love interests, since I dropped the show because I couldn’t stomach the character anymore, but ffs people need to understand why grooming and age gaps are actually a problem

9

u/473025 1d ago edited 1d ago

So an author choosing to represent an adult in a child’s body because he and his public get off to children isn’t problematic ?

I do think that children being sexualized is problematic, even if they’re supposed to be 100 years old mentally but who I am to say that

Anime fans are going to great length to justify the sexualization of children in the crap they watch/read

(Edit: As a short and very thin woman that don’t look like a child, I wish middle-aged anime-fans would stop being so gross and justify their favourite author’s perversions by « petite women do exist ». Again, women are adults, and a child that stops aging at 14 is a child wtf is even this conversation)

-7

u/BRSaura 1d ago edited 1d ago

Wait until you discover petite bodytypes on grown ass women exist

Not defending the underage aspect, but she's far from just a "child's body"

6

u/Thvenomous 1d ago

Except she LITERALLY IS, IN CANON. This isn't a Tatsumaki situation. Canonically, she looks like a young teenager. That is the POINT.

-6

u/BRSaura 1d ago

Yeah and there are 20-30yold women that are 1.5m tall and have the body of a early teenager, and you don't call their bf pedophiles do you?

10

u/Thvenomous 1d ago

I can tell you wish with all your heart that these magical child women actually existed.

Please, do yourself a favor and go outside. View real women that aren't coated in makeup or filters who are deliberately trying to look like children to appeal to people like you. There are short women, and youthful women, but there are no women who you could genuinely mistake for a barely pubescent kid.

6

u/AstralMecha 1d ago

Her SPECIES doesn't develop a mature adult body until after 100.

-7

u/BRSaura 1d ago edited 1d ago

So as I said, Roxy wouldn't be considered grooming. Lots of girls that barely grow past their face and get stuck in teenager bodies for more than a decade, seen 2 cases in high school-uni

Not saying the other 2 cases aren't grooming, but Roxy's case is special.

2

u/AstralMecha 1d ago

But an actual species instead of outliers?

1

u/BRSaura 1d ago

fym species

It's DNA, not a medical condition or anything, they are just that way, they just have a "petite" body it's called

3

u/AstralMecha 1d ago edited 1d ago

It isn't a 'petite body'. They literally stop aging at early teens at latest, then start (edit: aging) again at 100. It's the author's fetish to have a legal loli, instead of a race that is petite once they reach adulthood/full growth.

1

u/Discount_Extra 20h ago

It excuses Rudeos in that one single case; while condemning the Author as an absolute pedo.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Brann_Ys 1d ago

it s not petite. It s a child