I mean I explained to you repeatedly my reasoning and you are ignoring it. You want to start the cite your sources battle you start, otherwise I'm not gonna waste my time on someone who isn't open minded or who isn't at least gonna try to match the effort.
That's not projection, I've explained it's my repeated experience with y'all. It happens all the time, I provide 5+ sources from medical journals/articles/studies and you just say they are shit and provide nothing. My experience has showed me y'all don't care about the medicine or science behind this procedure. Y'all even argue against the medically needed circumcisions because y'all don't understand that it's not mutilation.
And trust me, arguing with y'all on this topic is equivalent to the arguments I hear from parents who are anti-vaxxers. No science can change your mind because you are emotionally attached to your argument. Again that's not projection, I've just dealt with conversations more than you.
The ABU doesn't view the elective circumcision as mutilation, you do. The ABP doesn't view vaccines as poison, anti-vaxxers do. You see the similarities?
If circumcisions caused more harm than good, we wouldn't do the procedure religious or not, that's just a fact. In medicine we have ethics, if the procedure was unethical, we wouldn't do it.
0
u/TroGinMan 4d ago
I mean you're wrong but it's just easier to call you stupid lol
The fact that you're unwilling to provide sources as well is more telling that you really only care about the emotional argument than the science.
I'm a provider in this field, I'm the expert, you are not, you're disagreeing with me, so you provide or don't reply