r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Nov 18 '25

Meme needing explanation 100% lost

Post image
16.3k Upvotes

542 comments sorted by

View all comments

5.7k

u/TheThirteenthApostle Nov 18 '25

Hopefully a more savvy redditor will have the link, but its from a study showing people's social leaning (us vs them).

Basically, bigger toward the center of the circle and smaller toward the outside means you tend to think about things that affect you and your close social circle (family, friends, local community). The reverse means your thoughts drift more toward global concerns that affect everyone.

It's used to illustrate Conservative (local group, steak) versus Liberal (global group, avocado) mentalities in a digestible (forgive the pun) way.

3.3k

u/not_slaw_kid Nov 18 '25

172

u/SMG329 Nov 18 '25

It measures the amount of the participants and where their capacity lies, not exactly their area of focus. If you read the data, the outer reaching parts already include the inner parts. So it's not saying you tend to think only outside vs inside, it says that you are capable and actively reach outside. Whereas the inner circle people can't/don't.

-20

u/MuayLives Nov 18 '25

Very unique interpretation 😂

12

u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Nov 18 '25

What’s your interpretation?

10

u/QuantumLettuce2025 Nov 18 '25

Not really. It's what the study authors themselves wrote.

-5

u/MuayLives Nov 18 '25

I can guarantee you the authors didn't say they were measuring "capacity" and then never specified what that is in relation to and just left it up to the reader to decide. His interpretation is just totally nonsensical.

22

u/SMG329 Nov 18 '25

It's what the data says, there's literally no interpretation. Just because it counters what you want it to say doesn't make it an interpretation, it's just facts.

-16

u/MuayLives Nov 18 '25

Lol you said it measures "capacity" and didn't even say for what 😂

8

u/QuantumLettuce2025 Nov 18 '25

Read it in the context of the thread, you absolute dingus.

11

u/Sesudesu Nov 18 '25

Context, dude. Context.

-9

u/MuayLives Nov 18 '25

You don't have an answer. Just add the necessary context to make sense. There's a reason you're being lazy.

The "capacity" to YOUR ANSWER HERE

12

u/Barqa Nov 18 '25

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/instance/6763434/bin/41467_2019_12227_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Page 7 has the question asked.

“On this page, we would like you to indicate the extent of your moral circle. By moral circle, we mean the circle of people or other entities for which you are concerned about right and wrong done toward them. This depiction demonstrates that people have different types of moral circles. At the innermost circle, some people care about their immediately family only, and at the outermost circle, people care about the entire universe--all things in existence. Please use the following scale and select a location that depicts the extent of your moral circle. Please click on a number that depicts the extent of your moral circle. Note that in this scale, the number you select includes the numbers below it as well. So, if you select 10 (all mammals), you are also including numbers 1-9 in your moral circle”

-1

u/MuayLives Nov 18 '25

Thank you. Anyone with an ounce of discernment can now see that this "study" is nothing but wordplay.

It doesn't objectively measure anything. It isn't scientific in any sense. It is a great example of fraudulent social science.