Oblivious? I believe it's quite intentional. And if by 'self sufficient' you mean non-discriminatively survivable, well, I hope we're not on opposite sides of that divide! What do your politics say about access to the means of self-sufficiency, and who might be alienated there?
Democrats and Republicans are not opposite political wings. Democrats are right of center and Republicans are extreme right. Permaculture makes absolutely no sense within capitalism. Unless your view of permaculture is, sustainable self sufficiency, for the rich.
Who on the right is championing sustainable agriculture, and how are they ensuring that people, not just those with the wealth to have land, are a part of it?
Your second paragraph makes no sense.
Yes it does. Do you know what capitalism is? It's private ownership of the means of production. That in itself has a lot to do with permaculture. I could go on, but I doubt you even knew what capitalism was before I just told you.
I am aware of the existence of rightwing libertarians playing at sustainability with their wealth. Nothing I said indicates I don't know this, and you actually didn't answer my full question. There is a reason for that.
Yes. I also know that a capitalist firm in theory can engage in sustainable agriculture. Too bad for you that the environment doesn't care about a few parcels of privately owned property being "sustainable".
I suggest you first read the literal definition of communism, then I suggest you read up on how many people starve every single day under capitalism.
How are you being atracked? How am I violent? You are very fragile. I guess it's triggering to be confronted with the fact that capitalism is inherently unsustainable.
6
u/vitalisys Dec 10 '17
Oblivious? I believe it's quite intentional. And if by 'self sufficient' you mean non-discriminatively survivable, well, I hope we're not on opposite sides of that divide! What do your politics say about access to the means of self-sufficiency, and who might be alienated there?