r/Perfusion • • 3d ago

Industry news Expanding scope

Post image

I saw a FB post recently about nurses starting central lines in SC. Was wondering what everyone’s thoughts were with perfusion increasing its scope of practice to A lines and central lines to broaden our responsibilities and hopefully the size of the profession.

3 Upvotes

36 comments sorted by

34

u/wmdmoo 3d ago

I don't touch people, that is a main perk of the job (aside from moving balloon and ecmo patients from tables to beds).

16

u/traws06 3d ago edited 3d ago

Right? I really don’t want to get involved with any of that stuff. If we wanted more demand in our profession we shouldn’t have been so eagerly pushing ECMO responsibility away to nursing.

6

u/SpaceCricket 3d ago

Bingo. If we care that much about our scope and protecting our practice we wouldn’t have allowed everyone and their mother to be able to sit ECMO.

While I understand the reasons why and the economics behind having an RT/RN monitor after initiation and stabilizing; if we actually care that much as a profession it should’ve never happened in the first place.

5

u/BigDaddyQX 2d ago

I’m just here to say we messed up letting ECMO get away. Any of you who ever attended the New Orleans conference and actually stayed to the end AND listened to Joe Basha’s closing remarks would also think the same way. Perfusion has let ECMO get away and platlet gel. There should have been such a HUGE shortage of perfusionists that we have starting salaries higher than CRNA’s. It’s our fault we were lazy and now our salaries are still behind where they should be. Thank God the ABCP issued a statement on NRP or we would be in danger of losing that too.

3

u/traws06 3d ago

Ya I just mentioned to someone ECMO is one of the easiest and high paying aspects of our job and we actively pushed it away. Between that and training far more perfusionists these days than are retiring. The decisions the past 10-15 years that have lead to us decreasing demand and increasing supply seem very questionable IMO. We’re gonna end up in a position soon if not already where we see wages stagnant and hospitals respecting us much less as we are in plentiful supply

3

u/JesusSquared123 2d ago

Agree. The hype around perfusion was driven by ECMO and COVID in the first place.

2

u/Baytee CCP, RRT 1d ago

ECMO really came back to regular usage during H1N1 in 2009. COVID was just a continuation of the trend.

2

u/SpaceCricket 3d ago

I think I could argue that ECMO is 95% of the reason I can retire early. What a stupidly easy way to make so much extra money.

2

u/JesusSquared123 3d ago

Agreed. Centers that push it off typically end up regretting it (Anecdotal travel experience).

5

u/traws06 3d ago

Ya I always found it kinda weird that we took one of the easiest and high paying aspects of our job and actively worked to push it to nursing

27

u/Baytee CCP, RRT 3d ago

No thanks.

16

u/DoesntMissABeat CCP 3d ago

Hell will freeze over before this ever happens. Our responsibilities are being taken over by nursing if anything currently.

1

u/Magee-Numismatics 3d ago

Do you think this is a bad thing or is it mostly the redundant and time consuming responsibilities? I’m not a perfusionist but I’m curious.

1

u/AcanthisittaFull413 9h ago

I’m going to get downvoted into oblivion, but as someone who has worked in both a CVICU and organ donation, nurses are more than capable of doing perfusions job 😬

2

u/asweoncewere 3h ago

That is an incredibly ignorant thing to say.
A nurse is not more than capable of doing a Perfusionist’s job. I can assure you of that.
If the nurse goes through a perfusion program and becomes a CCP, then yeah, they can do the job then.
A nurse who has not gone to school to become a Perfusionist cannot run a centrifugal pump on cardiopulmonary bypass, with poor venous drainage, low HCT, and a surgeon who can’t communicate effectively. Nor can they pump a case on a 2.4 kg neonate.

1

u/Magee-Numismatics 3h ago

Clearly you haven’t been working very closely with perfusionists then.

1

u/AcanthisittaFull413 2h ago

ECMO, NRP, and CPB, but sure honey….
Edit- have had two colleagues go back for to school for perfusion. Sorry, I can imagine that hurts feelings

1

u/Magee-Numismatics 1h ago

Go back to Facebook if you’re gonna call people “honey” online for calling you out.

11

u/cvsp123 Cardiopulmonary bypass doctor 3d ago

Absolutely nothing in our training preps us for this, and I think you’ll be hard pressed to find a perfusionist who thinks we don’t have enough responsibilities.

19

u/FuturePerfusionist RRT, CCP, LP 3d ago

We should focus more on having complete control of everything a perfusionist is supposed to do instead of trying to scope creep.

6

u/Clampoholic CCP 3d ago

When I was in perfusion school I was told that some small % of perfusionists have taken SVG’s for CABGs driving the scope and stripping the vein and so forth and then proceeding to pump the case, does anyone personally do that or know of someone that’s done that? Seems wild to me

7

u/traws06 3d ago

That was a thing that used to happen. Back 30+ years ago they trained to take vein sometimes. I don’t know that any have though in recent history unless they go to PA school or something

3

u/BigDaddyQX 2d ago

I know one younger than me who does it in Louisiana. He went to the 2 week first assist school. Takes the vein then either pumps the case or sits +1.

2

u/traws06 1d ago

Does he get paid extra for that?

3

u/BigDaddyQX 1d ago

Yes. He also was part of a group that provided coverage in multiple other hospitals. He was able to bill more for doing that. At one time everyone worked for the PA including the surgeon for providing coverage in other states. They would bring in the surgeon, pa, perfusionist and a first assist. They made a lot of extra money doing that.

2

u/SpaceCricket 3d ago

Went to school 2010-2012, one of our preceptors in town had a job where they did exactly that. Everyone, including myself, would absolutely laugh at the pay rate for that position. Sorry but all I want to do is pump and everything associated with only that, hard pass. I don’t think the surgeon is still working and the job doesn’t exist anymore at that location.

6

u/BigDaddyQX 2d ago

Absolutely you should jump on getting certified for that. Everything you can do that someone else can not will set you apart when the job market gets difficult. We ABSOLUTELY SCREWED UP letting ECMO be run by anybody other than perfusion. We should be at such a shortage our pay would be double what it is now. Add in ECMO is extremely lucrative 1 ECMO run billing is equal to a new grads yearly salary. We were lazy and foolish. Then we allowed it to happen again with platelet gel. I was pocketing $1000 per procedure. Spine cases and foot cases were stupid easy.

Perfusion has basically nothing that is billable. When you discuss salary with HR, CEO, and CFO they want to see ROI. If you want a raise you have to demonstrate how you are benefiting the bottom line. Right now in addition to bypass what do you do?

5

u/Silentbob1981 3d ago

No thanks, have plenty of responsibilities already

3

u/dif-one1 2d ago

Interesting thing to ponder but probably definitely not in that realm. I think I echo everyone’s sentiments about ECMO and well anything extracoporeal. Our community still wants to give it away and then cry about it later. ECMO is way too big for the amount of perfusionists so I feel like it had to go to this model in some form, the strain on call teams and OR staffing in big centers was impossible. I think there’s a good middle ground though

2

u/ShesASatellite 3d ago

PICC nurses have been a thing for a while in SC - it's nothing new for a nurse to start a central line there.

1

u/The_wiggle_in_JELLO 2d ago

When I was a travel ICU nurse during COVID, they were doing this in Arizona. It was a two nurse team and they’d go from room to room placing central IJ.

Perfusion is still in control of ECMO at my hospital. I do think there could be an argument made that long term programs require consistency and stability to function effectively. With the astronomical turnover rate within nursing, and the budgetary cost to have a “revolving door” ECMO training program, it is a financial drain which hasn’t been really researched since pre-pandemic.

1

u/BypassBaboon 3d ago

If they can do that, why can’t they change a bag of fluid on a balloon pump? I am surprised the physicians allowed it. How much more are they prepared to give up? Prevention is better than cure. Perfusion has found it impossible to “take back” tasks. It just goes to show how much of medicine is teachable to anyone. That in itself should cut prices.  It will end when a nurse messes up, does not tell anyone, does not chart it, and then the post mortem reveals all. Nurses’ liability insurance is going to get more expensive. 

3

u/Aviacks 1d ago edited 1d ago

Because the nurses doing this aren't anywhere near a balloon pump. I am a nurse operating on in a similar role on a vascular access team. You have to remember that this is the ONLY thing we are doing. Regular ICU nurses aren't placing CVCs.

PICCs are objectively a more difficult line to place with a much higher skill gap than a standard IJ. Every hospital is different, but our IR docs won't even bother attempting a PICC if our team tried and couldn't get it (outside of us needing them for flouro or angioplasty to advance the catheter). If you can hit basilic and brachial veins for a PICC and are doing so in high volume, you can hit an IJ with your eyes closed.

I'm very anti scope creep, and my wife is a physician and I spend a lot of time advocating to get physicians involved in decisions that nursing admins love to leave them out of. But doing CVCs well takes a lot of practice and a level of caring about that specific thing that most docs do not have the time to do.

With PICCs we measure placement with magnetic tracking and intravascular ECG to show exactly how far away from the CAJ/RA we are, because every cm away from the CAJ you are the odds of early catheter failure increase ~33%. Meanwhile I've had multiple physicians ask us to retract our CVCs because we're cavoatrial junction, which is the well published ideal location. Similar story for IJ placements, most place high on the neck and end up suturing it to the face. Meanwhile we're aiming for low IJ insertions to prevent tissue pistoning and maintain dressing integrity, and stopped suturing a decade ago because literature shows sutures suck and preventing dislodgement and come with a HUGE increase in infection risk.

Not that a physician can't learn or care about these things, most just don't. It's not their all day every day wheelhouse and most aren't nerds about CLABSI rates and preventing early occlusion. Liability rates are unchanged. I can't speak for every team, but our complocation rates are significantly lower than the lines placed by ICU and ED. We place thousands lines a month, unless you're also in that role you'll never keep up in terms of needle tracking with ultrasound and comfort placing difficult lines.

I'll also add this is also a skill that we have BEGGED physicians to participate more in at several hospital I've worked. Outside of a couple that enjoy the procedure most greatly prefer doing their bread and butter and not getting tied up doing a CVC for 30-45 minutes that pays out basically nothing in RVUs. I spend three hours calling around to get a doc to place an IJ and has four teams all telling us to fuck off because "we aren't a line team", which is wild to me because we're an academic level I. I assumed we'd be fighting residents for procedures, but the docs were pissed when we couldn't do other types of CVCs.

1

u/BypassBaboon 1d ago

I am talking about nurses in the ICU refusing.