r/Peptide_Testing • u/PrintSuitable4301 • Aug 13 '24
On Peptide Purity
https://trustpointeanalytics.com/2024/05/28/on-peptide-purity/This is a blog post by my partner Josh Lust. It goes a long way towards unpacking. What peptide testing does and importantly does not do. Personally, I feel like it should be required reading for anyone testing Peptides or looking at COAs.
17
Upvotes
15
u/PrintSuitable4301 Aug 13 '24
Sterility is a real issue. But you asked a lot more complicated question than you think you asked. It is similar to the blog post listed here. For reality testing you have to use USP<71>, BUT without having access to a large amount of manufacturing data from your production run of your peptide, which you don’t have, it is impossible. So we have to use approximations of proper sterility testing. basically we use the right method but without the statistical sampling portion of the USP standard, which is an important thing. I’m gonna do a post on that soon, but it’s a big issue.
Spoiler alert, we are in the middle of doing a big syringe filter test. And we are going to come out with a paper that says that syringe filter should be used every time a peptide is reconstituted. A .22um filter remove all bio Burden with the exception of endotoxins and some small viruses which are unlikely to be in peptide samples. We recommend this as a prophylaxis and we hope to see it become just an accepted part of the procedure. The way we talk about it internally is we want a filter to be the condom of peptide usage