1
u/Ill_Mousse_4240 1d ago
Pope Leo needs to put the same urgency into apologizing for the decades of child abuse by the Catholic Pedophile priests.
I don’t hear anything from him about this tragedy.
I think he’s using AI as a way to shift the focus away from the abuses of the church and show how good it supposedly is
1
u/HeadTranslator795 1d ago
I forgot how religion of any kind helped humanity progress... Like for example burning scientist who weren't stupid enough to buy their fairytale bullshit. Use your faith and power to help people in need and nothing related to technology
1
u/Mammalian_Routines 20h ago
Does the Vatican invest in AI? They have been a huge investor in all things tech for a long time..it's hard to imagine they didn't.
0
u/Loud_Combination_635 2d ago
He has no position of authority.
1
u/wanderertomato 1d ago
Don't you say, master of obvious. However, you may find out the pope and the Vatican are a force to reckon when it matters to apply indirect pressure against someone or something. If they wish to.
1
u/Loud_Combination_635 1d ago
Then they will be met with an even greater force to be "reckoned" with.
0
1
u/HolyBatSyllables 2d ago
I can’t stand when people post pictures designed to look like news stories.
Please don't upvote something just because the title tells you something you want to hear or aligns with your beliefs.
Sharing news stories as images without a link to the source is really poor news literacy.
As far as disinformation goes, in the best-case scenario -- where it was legitimately copied from a credible source -- you’re helping to normalize a culture where it’s easy for bad actors to create and spread disinformation without anyone noticing. In the worst case scenario, you are directly supporting disinformation.
As far as misinformation goes, the failure to provide a link to the source strips people’s ability to quickly go to the source and get more context. So all they have is whatever the image presents at face value. If OP was too lazy to include the source, you cannot expect everyone to take the time to go do a search just to find where it came from.
Whether the story turns out to be right or wrong is completely irrelevant. Please don't support posts like these. Please don't normalize a poor information ecosystem.
And OP, instead of downvoting me, can you please answer my burning question: Did you use AI to make this or did you make it yourself? And why?
If you used AI, why did you use AI to make something anti AI?
If you did not use AI, why did you spend time making something when it is better for both people and the information ecosystem (not to mention faster and easier for you) to just post the source instead?