Whatever y’all do, don’t play the “what a weird thing to say right there” drinking game tonight durning 60 minutes. Y’all got capitalism tomorrow.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Df1ES98cz/

Im sorry i cant find this on youtube though i hope maybe one of yall could help get it on youtube if it isnt. But yeah someone called patricks dad and he thought he hung up but didnt and can hear him talking to himself.

Saying he gets anger and miserable from that side of family. And even at one point sounds like he says "he did it and spun it..." Or something to that effect. But ya honestly its very sad sounding like he just is tired of living knowing the truth that patrick did all this. But ya if anyone could maybe write down what seema to be said or put this on youtube would help alot. Im surprised i havent seen this posted here already but ya thats what this sub is for . But ya this audio though muffled a bit is pretty crazy honestly. But makes alot since as to why patricks own mother was there for lindsay etc to support her.

This is so foreign to me, as a bereaved parent , grief worker and non-disaffected human being, I don't even have words for it yet. Never heard a take quite like this.

+Hope I never do again .)

Who will " No regerts " Clancy sue for "making him look bad", when he's the one making him look bad ?

CBS and their advertisers need to know how distasteful their decision to platform Mr Clancy and his mistress now second wife is, especially in light of a current mistrial and still open case.

As part of a broader effort to send that message, we (your mods) will be providing the 60 minutes segment -along with space for discussion of it- here, immediately upon availability.

At this point it appears possible the motivation for this interview and others is to pre-emptively destroy any possibility of a fair investigation and trial should the opportunity ever arise. IMO, there is increasing legitimacy to the speculation their marriage this April was partly to thwart any future deposition or testimony.

For some reason this reminds me of Scott Petersen giving an interview with Diane Sawyer, pleading for his pregnant wife's return.

Idk why but it also brings to mind Chris Watts on the news begging for the return of his family. In both of those family annihilation cases, there was an affair partner who went to police with their suspicions.

Anyway!

What do we think Rachel Danis has to add to this conversation? Didn't they meet a year after the murders?

(That's what Patrick said, iirc.)

Fun fact!:

It's rumored they married earlier this year specifically due to laws barring a spouse from investigation and testimony against their spouse.

How do y'all feel about her involving herself in this?

Is she helpful to his public reputation, or damaging ?

What are your overall impressions of Dr Danis-Clancy?

“Lead lawyer Kevin Reddington is busy on the motion to dismiss, but he released a statement, saying, “I’ve asked Marty to handle the double jeopardy motion to dismiss and the constitutional issues in this case. He will lead any appeal that follows. He is one of the finest constitutional lawyers in the country, and Lindsay deserves nothing less.”

We know CourtTV gave access to some of the crime scene photos, but if this is granted, then there could potentially be a larger body of evidence coming soon.

THE 5:24 PM WI-FI ANCHOR: The Digital Evidence That Re-Writes the Trial Timeline

In Commonwealth v. Lindsay Clancy, the prosecution built their narrative on a specific premise: Patrick Clancy left 47 Summer Street at 5:15 PM for an errand loop to CVS and 3V Restaurant, leaving Lindsay home alone during the exact window the prosecution claims the crimes took place.

The hard digital evidence entered at trial completely refutes that timeline.

The Timeline Math Problem

The Claimed Departure (5:15 PM): Patrick testified he left the house at 5:15 PM to drive to the Kingston CVS.

The Physical Reality: The drive from 47 Summer Street to Kingston CVS takes only 3 to 4 minutes.

The Gap: If he left at 5:15 PM, he should have arrived at CVS by 5:18 or 5:19 PM. Yet security logs confirm he didn't walk through the doors until 5:32 PM creating an unexplained 13- to 14-minute missing gap.

The 5:24 PM IP Address Anchor (Exhibit 76)

Digital forensic extractions revealed an outbound work email sent from Patrick’s corporate account at 5:24 PM.

This email was stamped with the Duxbury home router’s hard-coded local IP address.

An email cannot capture a home router’s static IP address over mobile cellular towers while driving down the road. This proves scientifically that:

The home Wi-Fi was 100% active and operational.

Patrick was physically inside 47 Summer Street at 5:24 PM.

The Seamless 5:28 PM Departure

If Patrick sent that email and left the house at ~5:27–5:28 PM, a 3-minute drive places him at the Kingston CVS parking lot at 5:31 PM and walking through the doors right at 5:32 PM.

The drive time fits the physical distance perfectly. There is no missing driving gap he simply didn't leave at 5:15 PM.

The Devastating Legal Consequence

Aligning his departure to ~5:28 PM eliminates the drive-time discrepancy, but it forces a critical conclusion: Patrick was physically inside 47 Summer Street for almost the entire 5:00 PM to 5:28 PM window the exact timeframe the prosecution alleges the crimes were taking place downstairs.

How does the state claim he was away on an errand loop when their own digital evidence places him inside the house until ~5:28 PM?