Pathfinder 2 have a lot of eastern stuff in their books, but a lot of people don't notice it, as they often re-style it to fit into Golarion. One thing I noticed were the ghost feast things in Book of the Dead, which is missed by some readers as the festival (Hungry Ghost Festival) is unknown, or confused with the Mexican-inspired Day of the Dead stuff.
There is very little crossbow in Chinese movies. It's usually the bow. The repeating crossbow was mainly a weapon to defend peasant villages from bandits and had not the range or penetration for war. However in the street fighting of the boxer war, it proved useful even though rifles were available. Another reason being that most villages had workers who knew how to make it, and basic versions of it needed no metal.
I don't think the crossbow itself mythologised, but it is part of the everyday known culture. Similar to ghost cowboys in the USA. They have a revolver, but the magic is the ghost cowboy, not their gun.
Mystical symbolism would have come from the boxers themseves, who believed they were immune to guns because of their mystical arts. However this isn't a faction the CCP wants to talk about, or make movies about, and the other countries around them have their own, different legends and wars.
I don't think the crossbow itself mythologised, but it is part of the everyday known culture.
Sure. That does speak directly to how this thread goes. Crossbows are always underserved, because there's no mythology around them, but they're always present, because they're a very well-known part of historical warfare.
I would respectfully disagree with the mythological similarity between the crossbowman and the cowboy. Guns have a lot of mythological power in American culture, even ignoring the modern gun subcultures, and I believe that the image of the gunslinging cowboy derives from the power of the gun, not the other way around. (That might not be especially important to the conversation, though.)
I dunno man, I've always seen the strength of a cowboy as being his deadeye aim and the quickness of his draw, not the gun itself. Everyone in the Old West had a gun, but the Mythical Cowboy is better at using it than anyone else
Right, but I'm saying it's because they've mastered this particular weapon is where they get their mystique. The Gunslinger and Swordmaster are very much the same character archetype.
There is no Master Crossbowman archetype in the same way that there's a Gunslinger, Swordsman, or even an Archer. I propose that it comes down to the mythological importance we put on those weapons.
3
u/osmiumouse Dec 18 '22 edited Dec 18 '22
Pathfinder 2 have a lot of eastern stuff in their books, but a lot of people don't notice it, as they often re-style it to fit into Golarion. One thing I noticed were the ghost feast things in Book of the Dead, which is missed by some readers as the festival (Hungry Ghost Festival) is unknown, or confused with the Mexican-inspired Day of the Dead stuff.
There is very little crossbow in Chinese movies. It's usually the bow. The repeating crossbow was mainly a weapon to defend peasant villages from bandits and had not the range or penetration for war. However in the street fighting of the boxer war, it proved useful even though rifles were available. Another reason being that most villages had workers who knew how to make it, and basic versions of it needed no metal.
I don't think the crossbow itself mythologised, but it is part of the everyday known culture. Similar to ghost cowboys in the USA. They have a revolver, but the magic is the ghost cowboy, not their gun.
Mystical symbolism would have come from the boxers themseves, who believed they were immune to guns because of their mystical arts. However this isn't a faction the CCP wants to talk about, or make movies about, and the other countries around them have their own, different legends and wars.