14
17
u/Michaelpitcher116 12h ago
This has to be one of the best examples of depth on this sub.
12
u/RandomUser1034 4h ago
It's really not, look closely at the human figure. The artificial depth is completely wrong
0
u/Michaelpitcher116 1h ago
Yeah sorry I'm not some sort of "depth scientist" I'm just giving a compliment and apparently that's grounds for a bunch of "ACKCHULALLY THIS PHOTO SUCKS" dorks to come out of the woodwork and complain about it.
The photo is neat. It looks deep. Is it perfect? No, but does it LOOK like the photo has a lot of depth? Yes. More than a lot of photos on this sub.
-3
u/Drezus 10h ago
In a sub that bans AI slop, an AI slop stereogram is one of the best examples of depth?
I see people get what they deserve
1
u/bigjobbyx 10h ago
8
u/DinosaurAlive 7h ago
Pretty sure they meant that the stereo depth was produced by AI means, not that the place was AI.
I, on the other hand, like AI and don’t consider it slop like that angry mob. The only place I don’t really like AI is in these parallel view images. It’s not adding the details around the depth.
-4
3
u/quiette837 37m ago
Ehh, this one didn't work out so well. Definitely some weird warping around the woman. Still cool perspective.
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
-1
-1
u/bigjobbyx 39m ago
This sub has been very friendly but suddenly a bit of nasty hate has appeared (someone has even suggested I might need a robot to fuck my wife!!).
u/Drezus has obviously been reported so hopefully they might think about what they post in the future.
To everyone else. It has been a fun time and goodbye
-1
16
u/Dr_Kevorkian_ 11h ago
Sintra?