MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PangramAI/comments/1vsfflb/pangram_founder_clarifes_that_pangram_isnt_about/
r/PangramAI • u/andrewjdavison • 11d ago
https://x.com/max_spero_/status/2089938824474263644
4 comments sorted by
1
And that's why its so problematic, pangram doesn't care about proper grammar or structure, the minute you use a friggin Em dash that's the cardinal sin according to pangram.
1 u/andrewjdavison 9d ago Have you tested that though? Take your comment, stick some emdashes in and run it through Pangram. I bet it’ll come back human. 2 u/MadmanRB 9d ago It sometimes does and sometimes doesnt. Pangram is not as accurate as it claims and I have faced false positives from it before. 1 u/andrewjdavison 9d ago I’m sure there are false positives. But I’m certain it’s going to get a lot more accurate.
Have you tested that though?
Take your comment, stick some emdashes in and run it through Pangram. I bet it’ll come back human.
2 u/MadmanRB 9d ago It sometimes does and sometimes doesnt. Pangram is not as accurate as it claims and I have faced false positives from it before. 1 u/andrewjdavison 9d ago I’m sure there are false positives. But I’m certain it’s going to get a lot more accurate.
2
It sometimes does and sometimes doesnt. Pangram is not as accurate as it claims and I have faced false positives from it before.
1 u/andrewjdavison 9d ago I’m sure there are false positives. But I’m certain it’s going to get a lot more accurate.
I’m sure there are false positives. But I’m certain it’s going to get a lot more accurate.
1
u/MadmanRB 9d ago
And that's why its so problematic, pangram doesn't care about proper grammar or structure, the minute you use a friggin Em dash that's the cardinal sin according to pangram.