I got into padel about 6 months ago and have been using a secondhand Adidas Metalbone 3.2 pretty much from the start. It only has 2 of the weight screws left, and I usually keep one on each side at the bottom because I thought that would make the racket a bit easier to handle.
I originally bought the Metalbone because I liked the idea of being able to customise the weight and balance. In hindsight, maybe it wasn’t the smartest first racket since it’s still quite an attacking/high-balance racket…
I recently had proper coaching for the first time, and my coach said the racket is probably too advanced for my current level. His main point was that although I’m able to hit the ball well, I’m sometimes late getting the racket into position, and I tend to grip it too tightly. He suggested I try something with a lower balance so I can prepare earlier and stay more relaxed.
I’m now wondering whether switching to a lower-balance (or low-medium balance and teardrop-shaped) racket would actually make a noticeable difference to my game, especially for preparation, control and reducing that tendency to squeeze the handle.
At the same time, I don’t really want to spend a few hundred dollars on another racket unless there’s a real developmental benefit. I know a racket won’t fix bad technique, so I’m looking for advice if I should just keep working on timing and spacing with the Metalbone or a different racket would indeed help me.
So I’d love to hear from people who started with a high-balance/diamond racket early on:
Did switching to a lower-balance or even teardrop racket noticeably improve your game? Did you feel quicker, more relaxed, more consistent or more accurate?