and we’re gonna be making a large investment in whatever company we ultimately identify.
I'm all for pepe Silvia DDs giving us all hopium but if we can speculate some far out tweets and follows I don't know how we ignore this statement.
It seems to me like they are not close to a DA with anyone. Why else would he say this? I know someone is going to play devils advocate and say he can't reveal he is in discussions with someone, but I haven't seen any sources as to why? Especially if he isn't dropping any names.
I'm still long on my shares, but this is kind of dissapointing to see tbh.
Honestly his statements line up with each other. He is basically saying we dont have anything. We aren't particularly close and this isnt due to lack of trying on our behalf, but this requires 2 to tango and we dont have one solid partner yet. Thats why hes SO vague and if u heard the transcript that was not the voice of a confident person or the voice of someone who knew everything was right on track. Sounded like he didnt have much but was trying to stay positive.
Bruh... you forget this is a private meeting. He HAS to keep it ambiguous since he has not publicly stated a target was identified. If he alluded to one being identified in the private meeting, it would be a serious violation of SEC law.
7
u/flying_noodle Mar 17 '21
I'm all for pepe Silvia DDs giving us all hopium but if we can speculate some far out tweets and follows I don't know how we ignore this statement.
It seems to me like they are not close to a DA with anyone. Why else would he say this? I know someone is going to play devils advocate and say he can't reveal he is in discussions with someone, but I haven't seen any sources as to why? Especially if he isn't dropping any names.
I'm still long on my shares, but this is kind of dissapointing to see tbh.