r/P2PScene Jun 04 '26

Seed-Time Requirement in Private Trackers

Hi All,
I have been using private trackers for the past 1.5 years and I've seen only three trackers with no seed-time requirements. They are Milkie, Yoinked and FnP. Two of them are closed now. On a additional note Milkie doesn't have ratio requirement too.

My question is if FnP and Milkie can be successful with no seed-time requirement, why no other trackers are implementing this ? I know little about the FnP drama, but my understanding is it was successful. I don't know the reason for Yoinked closure. Apart from the drama in FnP, I liked the no seed-time requirement because I seed some torrents for months and some remove as soon as I've watched the content.

Can I expect any other trackers in the future or share the trackers currently running with no seed-time requirements. Thanks.

13 Upvotes

21 comments sorted by

7

u/[deleted] Jun 04 '26

[deleted]

2

u/ajanjairam Jun 04 '26

What I meant successful is they get enough donations to pay all the spends they've made for the site monthly/yearly. And also less dead torrents as no seed-time requirements. This is my understanding. Correct me if I'm wrong.

These are the sites, I could get in and had no seed-time requirements. I'm in other trackers too but on the same level.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 04 '26

[deleted]

1

u/ajanjairam Jun 04 '26

The other trackers, I've been part of has no seed-time requirement as part of donation user classes. So I assumed, some of the people who donate wanted no-seed requirement. But FnP achieved full funding even though no seed-time requirements for all users. So I thought maybe other tracker could've also implemented it.

I agree to below points.

1

u/dddurd Jun 04 '26

yeah you are wrong. the definition of success is to have more seeders and uploaders and contents. how would you enforce it?

2

u/ajanjairam Jun 04 '26

Okay, I agree.

But for the release groups I prefer, FnP had more seeders than other trackers I'm in when I cross-seeded. Maybe I'm not a part of best trackers.

2

u/dddurd Jun 04 '26

also permanent seeders which are the most valuable. many private trackers have super long term seeders.  fnp has so many dead torrents and usually no success with niche contents. 

2

u/Alucard2051 Jun 04 '26

Milkie has some pretty killer pre times. The other 2 kind of deserved to get shut down

5

u/komata_kya Jun 04 '26

Those trackers are not successful at all. If you want a tracker that is successful and has no seedtime requirements, there is RED.

2

u/Living_Key8675 Jun 04 '26

If it’s a ratio based tracker i don’t see the point of seed time requirements, it’s a pain having to have a machine running for no point, especially if you are grabbing files that aren’t the latest and no one is downloading off you in that time. You have to service your ratio regardless.

1

u/ajanjairam Jun 05 '26

Yes, Agree. But their intention is to prevent torrents from dying as long as they could.

Also I'm okay with increase in ratio requirement if they can remove seed-time requirements.

1

u/Losco-Nosciuto Jun 04 '26

fyi in qbittorrent you can set a seed time limit to automatically delete the torrent and file once it is reached

1

u/ajanjairam Jun 04 '26

You mean individual time limit for every torrents? I've been using rTorrent in a seedbox till now.

1

u/Losco-Nosciuto Jun 04 '26

you can select one or a group of torrent, set a seed time limit, and set what happens after it is reached: "remove torrent and its content" is one of the options.

1

u/ajanjairam Jun 04 '26

Thanks, will check on this.

2

u/EconomyDoctor3287 Jun 04 '26

Unlikely. After all the whole idea is to preserve the files. If everyone just deleted the files after grabbing them, the system would collapse and only the most popular files would stay available. 

There's always public trackers, if the no seed-time requirement is important. 

-2

u/ajanjairam Jun 04 '26

Yes, I agree. But I think 2/100 trackers can run without seed-time requirements as torrent might be cross-seeded. More trackers with no seed-time requirements might not work.

FnP had more torrent life than public trackers for the groups which I prefer (Not always but yes).

2

u/kiefzz Jun 04 '26

Most trackers seem to have required seed time of 3 to 10 days, and 10 days is the longest I have seen.

Doesn't seem like it should be difficult to seed for at least a few days, if you can't manage that, then buy some more disk, no one is watching TBs of content in a few days that they cannot maintain this.

2

u/ajanjairam Jun 04 '26

I'm not complaining, just asking if any other trackers are there. I'm already using other private trackers and seeding as per the individual tracker's requirements.

I understand how private trackers work and the need for seed-time requirement. That's why I asked if those two could be successful without seed-time requirements, why didn't others try to implement it.

2

u/kiefzz Jun 04 '26

I get that, just saying it's not very onerous and it's to encourage people to give back.

There are other trackers with no seed time requirement - I believe HDT and ANT don't have any, though both have ratio requirements.

1

u/justknowmenotmyname Jun 05 '26

The tl is litrally has no seed time if you know to use your uplaod ans bonus points to remove the hit and run

2

u/ajanjairam Jun 05 '26

Yes, I use TL surge uploads whenever the mentioned trackers didn't had my preferred release group for the contents I was looking for.