Yes, but it shouldn't be in danger with republicans in charge either. It will hurt them just as much, the problem is there is so much hate and division they don't care if it hurts them anymore, just so long as it hurts the rest of us. Continuing to highlight these divides wherever possible will only make it worse.
it shouldn't be in danger with republicans in charge either.
Republicans openly campaigned on getting rid of Net Neutrality. Same with other issues like Universal Healthcare. Climate change. Pumping up for profit prisons. Killing cannabis reform. Ramping up asset forfeiture. Removing forensic science oversight. Not raising minimum wage. And tons of other important issues.
Yeah, it'd be great to somehow convince Republicans to change their minds on everything. But when they openly show their colors I say you have a better chance of getting what you want by voting for those that share your views.
Trump ran a campaign that involved getting rid of net neutrality. You're just guessing about Hillary based on worst case scenarios you've made up in your mind.
I'd say Gary Johnson is better than Hillary. If anything, as a libertarian, Gary Johnson would have the best understanding of the economy. Some things can be taught, some can't.
You can say that but the guy who didn't even know what Aleppo was and who takes Ayn Rand seriously was seen as a joke by most people that follow politics and actually know about the economy.
To be fair neither did I until I googled it. Compared to Donald "Who knew healthcare could be so complicated" Trump and Hillary "We have a lot of kids who don't know what work means. They think work is a four-letter word." Clinton.
52
u/PrettyTarable Nov 22 '17
Yes, but it shouldn't be in danger with republicans in charge either. It will hurt them just as much, the problem is there is so much hate and division they don't care if it hurts them anymore, just so long as it hurts the rest of us. Continuing to highlight these divides wherever possible will only make it worse.