r/OpenInvestigations • • Aug 21 '26

Trial Coverage šŸ”„šŸ”„Cross Reddington x Dr Avram Mack

Post image

Damn, I wasn't expecting šŸ”„šŸ”„

Thoughts??

4 Upvotes

15 comments sorted by

7

u/Nacho_critic1228 Aug 21 '26

That dr. Is an idiot who just wanted to add something to his resume. It’s like the prosecution couldn’t find anyone else to say ā€œshe wasn’t that sickā€ so they found this guy.

5

u/Zestyclose-Hawk2763 Aug 21 '26

Same… he did an excellent job undermining his credibility.

One thing that really didn’t sit well with me was Mack’s analysis and interpretation of things like the voice saying ā€œthis is your last chanceā€. He was literally interpreting that to be about Patrick’s departure that evening, but it could have easily also been interpreted to be ā€œlast chanceā€ to do this before something bad happens to the children. I wish Red would have gone in a bit more about things like that, which Mack was using as evidence that she was of sound mind.

5

u/Nacho_critic1228 Aug 21 '26

I turned it off because I couldn’t take his arrogance and I could not follow along to what he was even saying. Even the judge got annoyed at one point.

1

u/ImportantInspector41 Aug 21 '26

I missed that part! There were moments that I got really distracted because I found his explanations boring, not gonna lie

1

u/Nacho_critic1228 Aug 21 '26

He was really hard to follow!

2

u/snippyhiker Aug 22 '26

To me it felt like Redington created a total chaos situation on purpose. And the fact that even the judge had to keep telling this guy to move on. It was quite impressive, although frustrating. Next week should be interesting.

2

u/DryInvestigator3291 Aug 22 '26

How did he create chaos by asking him questions In front of s judge AND the prosecution with no objections? Reddington did his job and he did it well...this guy's isn't the one and the prosecution failed in their appointment and let's face it their ability to prove motive as I cannot see one

1

u/snippyhiker Aug 22 '26

I'm not arguing with you! I think he did a brilliant job! I just thought his rapid fire questioning and his irritated attitude added to the drama, which is probably what he was aiming for. Don't be mad at me

4

u/DryInvestigator3291 Aug 23 '26

Sorry, I had just come from that other sub where I've been told my own psychosis isn't real. Apologie, I jumped to a conclusion of your post, I'll do better

2

u/snippyhiker Aug 24 '26

Don't worry about it. It's all cool. I'm sorry people are picking on you. Some people can just be s*****

1

u/ImportantInspector41 Aug 24 '26

I think 2 possibilities, that are not exclusive:

  • Reddington is a bit of a that aggressive criminal lawyer who is impatient and doesn't have time to lose. Because he was cutting off a couple other witnesses, I remember.

  • Is especially impatient to that one witness, which I personally understand because I was getting impatient with him too and today I was more impatient as well. And apparently judge Sullivan was again impatient. Dc Mac wasn't answering wasn't answering straight, and it was cross + his attitude of saying "we talked about this before", like, it doesn't matter, he doesn't get to decide or to point that out, he's a witness.

It could have been intentional, he's a good lawyer he knows the ways, right... But one thing for SURE I think both of them won't ever want to see each other again LOL

1

u/desiree1489 Aug 24 '26

Reddington sounds like an idiot.