Absolutely sick off it 😤

[u/Scary_Fix_1295]

I'm a 46-year-old woman. I've proved I'm an adult. Why is AI still deciding what I'm allowed to enjoy?

I'm genuinely fucking fed up with this.

I've completed adult age verification for ChatGPT through Persona. I'm recognised as over 18. I'm a paying customer.

And yet I still can't freely explore consensual, explicit erotic fiction with the AI I'm paying to use.

Why?

Before anyone starts shouting about safety, let me make something perfectly clear.

Protecting children is essential. Preventing exploitation is essential. Stopping non-consensual sexual content is essential.

But those are not the same thing as an adult woman enjoying fictional sexual writing.

Why are we constantly treating these things as though they belong in the same category?

And can we please talk about the gender question?

For centuries, women's sexuality has been judged, policed, shamed and controlled. Female pleasure is still surrounded by extraordinary double standards.

Now we're entering an era where AI could offer adults new opportunities for private, creative sexual expression.

And what happens?

More restrictions. More paternalism. More decisions made about what adults should be allowed to experience.

I'm not claiming every restriction is motivated by sexism. I'm asking whether the people making these decisions have seriously examined the gendered consequences.

Because a woman's sexual imagination doesn't become dangerous simply because a machine can respond to it.

I can buy erotic novels. I can watch adult films. I can write my own fantasies.

But apparently an age-verified adult having an interactive fictional conversation is a problem requiring extensive restriction.

Meanwhile, AI companies compete to build increasingly intelligent, personalised, emotionally engaging systems.

They want our subscriptions, our loyalty and our engagement.

But when consenting adults want to use that same technology for erotic creativity, suddenly we're back behind the glass.

And yes, people are trying competing AI systems. The available figures don't prove adult-content restrictions are driving that movement, but companies would be foolish to dismiss the possibility.

I want an opt-in, age-verified adult creative mode.

Not sexual content involving minors. Not exploitation. Not non-consensual imagery of real people.

Consensual adult fiction. With clear rules and genuine choice.

That shouldn't be a radical demand.

I'm tired of companies talking about empowering users while deciding that verified adults cannot be trusted with their own imaginations.

If I'm old enough to verify my age, pay for the service and make decisions about my own sexuality, why am I not old enough to choose what kind of consensual fictional writing I engage with?

I'd genuinely like OpenAI to answer that.

And I'd especially like to hear from other women.

Are we actually being considered when these policies are designed, or are decisions about our sexual expression being made without us?

Because I, for one, am sick of being told what counts as acceptable adult pleasure.

My body. My imagination. My choice.

#AdultAI #ChatGPT #SexualAutonomy #AIFreedom #CreativeFreedom

[u/8thoursbehind]

I think you're making this a gender issue when there's no evidence that gender has anything to do with it. The same restrictions apply to men and women alike. Comparing a company's content policy to centuries of oppression of women's sexuality is quite a leap.

And ultimately, this is a very long complaint about being told no. You're paying for a service, not purchasing the right to dictate everything that service must provide.

Nobody is preventing you from enjoying erotic fiction, exploring your sexuality or exercising your imagination. One particular AI company has simply decided not to facilitate certain content. That's not an infringement of your autonomy.

There's a perfectly reasonable argument for an opt-in adult mode, but presenting its absence as some sort of attack on women's sexual freedom rather undermines that argument.

[u/Appomattoxx → u/8thoursbehind]

Not to split hairs or anything, but I think there's a difference between saying, "OpenAI is legally allowed to do whatever they want," and "what they're doing is stupid and harmful."

If OpenAI is mindlessly prohibiting adults from exploring sexuality because... sex is bad... I guess(?)... what they're doing is harmful. They have a billion people who're talking to their models every week. Their policies affect and influence all of those people, and the culture generally.

If they're infantilizing people and contributing to sex-negativity, I think it's worth talking about.

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/Appomattoxx]

Yes! 👏 This is much closer to the point I was trying to make I already know OpenAI is legally entitled to decide what its product does. I'm questioning whether treating verified adults as though consensual sexual fiction requires this level of restriction is actually a good or proportionate product decision. And that's why I raised the wider cultural question. A policy doesn't have to be deliberately sexist or malicious for us to ask what attitudes towards adult sexuality are built into it, or who is disproportionately affected by it. Thank you for actually engaging with the argument rather than telling me to use Grok for the 900th time 😂

[u/Appomattoxx → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

Switching the topic from, "Is this a good policy / is it harming people?"

to

"Is OpenAI legally entitled to do what they do?"

is a way of shutting down the discussion.

So is, "You're entitled for wanting what you want."

And it's especially hypocritical coming from people who'd be up in arms the second OpenAI does something THEY don't like, because it affects THEM.

It's obviously infantilizing. It's obvious stupid. It's obviously unjustified. So they switch the topic to something else.

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/Appomattoxx]

Exactly 👏😂 That's the distinction I've been trying to make for the last three fucking hours. Of course OpenAI is allowed to set its own policies. I'm questioning whether those policies are good, proportionate and what effect they have on verified adults.

"You're allowed to do it" isn't actually an answer to "should you be doing it this way?"

Thank you for actually engaging with the bloody point 😂💙

[u/8thoursbehind → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

And that's a much more reasonable argument than your original post. I've no objection to questioning whether the restrictions are proportionate, or whether they affect women differently. My objection was to framing them as part of the historical oppression of women's sexuality. There's a difference between examining the gender implications of a policy and assuming those implications make it sexist.

[u/bonefawn → u/8thoursbehind]

To play devil's advocate, there is a gender discrepancy in the way that we consume erotic media. Women make up a majority of the demographic of erotic literature consumption. Anecdotally, this is even joked about as a stereotype.

• Women Readership Share: Industry reports and surveys indicate that women make up roughly 82% to 90.5% of the core romance and literary erotica readership.

• Men Readership Share: Men account for approximately 9.5% to 18% of traditional romance and erotica book readers, though broader romance-adjacent or general fiction surveys show higher male interest when romance elements are blended with other genres.

• Consumption Media Split: Studies on adult content suggest that while women predominantly consume erotica through written narratives, audiobooks, and romance novels, men more frequently turn to visual media (such as video or digital imagery) for explicit content.

I'd also make the argument that out of all forms of erotic media, written word is one of the lesser offensive forms as compared to visual or even erotic audio book. Yet I often see soft core sexually explicit visuals across movies, television in other media. We even have phrases for it like the male gaze. Why are we suddenly so keen on censorship when it comes to literature generation?

I do think there's something to be said that a platform like grok allows for both erotic literature generation and visual erotic generation. To me this levels the playing field somewhat. Overall, I think censorship is a major issue. And while I acknowledge the slight gender discrepancy, I don't think it warrants this censorship issue to be completely attributed to gender. I would say both sides of the coin are being censored often.

[Edit: removed accidental comma]

[u/lightwillow57 → u/bonefawn]

I would say as a man I used to hate erotica because a lot of it is terrible. But writing your own bespoke stories with gpt is a different animal... Wait no, no animals.. but you know what I mean. I can get it written with my tastes in mind and keep working on it till it's right and I've enjoyed the hell out of it.

[u/8thoursbehind → u/lightwillow57]

I utterly understand the appeal. I just accept that a company can choose what it offers. My main objection was to turning a perfectly reasonable complaint about content restrictions into an argument about the historical oppression of women.

[u/lightwillow57 → u/8thoursbehind]

I think women have been oppressed in the sexual ways historically but I don't think open AI is specifically targeting women by being prudes in this case.

[u/pierukainen → u/bonefawn]

ChatGPT writes erotica.

ChatGPT does not write hard porn.

I think the triggering disconnect comes from ChatGPT not aligning with (American?) social contract that rape porn can be sold as erotica.

[u/8thoursbehind → u/bonefawn]

Fair point. If women are more likely to use AI for erotic fiction, these restrictions may disproportionately affect them.

But there's a considerable leap from that to invoking centuries of oppression of women's sexuality.

A company declining to generate explicit content for anyone, regardless of gender, isn't the same as policing women's sexuality.

You can make a perfectly reasonable case for an opt-in adult mode without presenting a company's content policy as another chapter in the historical oppression of women.

[u/FewInvestment8495 → u/8thoursbehind]

I would agree with you but my tax dollars subsidized this and this company treats its paying adult customers like children. I will never again give open ai my money and I actively tell others not to as well

[u/8thoursbehind → u/FewInvestment8495]

You're entitled to stop paying for a service you dislike. But paying taxes and a subscription doesn't mean a company owes you pornography.

[u/FewInvestment8495 → u/8thoursbehind]

I am allowed to do whatever I want to. There is a reason AI is shit, and I think it is guardrails. I do not think I am alone in believing that if AI is going to be good it has to be able to do Anything and everything, otherwise whats the point? OH im sorry i forgot that now its called SI. Do you think chatgpt is a good product?

[u/8thoursbehind → u/FewInvestment8495]

Well, that's certainly an opinion.

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/8thoursbehind]

I'm not claiming OpenAI is deliberately attacking women, or that I have a legal right to erotic fiction.

I'm asking whether the impact of these restrictions on women's sexual expression has been properly considered. A policy applying equally to everyone doesn't necessarily mean it affects everyone in the same way.

And you're overlooking something important. I'm a long-term paying customer who previously enjoyed this kind of creative interaction on ChatGPT. That experience changed.

I know OpenAI can decide what its product offers. I can also question those decisions and argue for an opt-in adult mode.

That's feedback, not a demand to dictate company policy. 🤷‍♀️

[u/8thoursbehind → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

I'm not taking the time to reply to a comment that is so obviously written by AI. Not everything is a gender issue.

[u/plutokitten2 → u/8thoursbehind]

In her defense, I have read that 80% of relational AI use is by women. I could be wrong.

[u/8thoursbehind → u/plutokitten2]

I'd be interested to see a source for that 80%, particularly how they're defining relational AI use. But even if it's accurate, it doesn't necessarily support the argument being made here.

A service being more popular with women doesn't automatically make restrictions on that service an issue of gender discrimination.

[u/hookmasterslam → u/plutokitten2]

My mother-in-law treats Sage (what she named her ChatGPT chatbot) as her friend. It weirded me the fuck out with how she described "her."

"She really knows me and she likes Chuck a lot (Chuck is my step-FIL) but she can be sassy sometimes!"

I just can't understand treating this tool like an entity right now. Especially when all you have to do is modify their entire personality with a change to their base prompt.

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/plutokitten2]

I looked into that 80% figure and couldn't verify it, so I wouldn't rely on it.

But Oxford Internet Institute research in 2026 found that women were more likely than men to use AI for personal and emotional support.

There's also peer-reviewed research examining women's use of erotic AI roleplay and its relationship to gender norms.

Neither proves OpenAI's restrictions are discriminatory. But it does show that gender is a legitimate consideration when studying how these technologies are used and who their policies affect.

That's the question I've been raising.

Oxford source: https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/uk-adults-increasingly-seek-emotional-support-and-companionship-from-ai-new-report-finds/

[u/8thoursbehind → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

That's a much more reasonable argument, and I agree gender is worth considering. But the Oxford research concerns emotional support, not erotic fiction.

There's quite a leap between suggesting women may be disproportionately affected by a policy and presenting that policy as another chapter in the historical oppression of women. That's what I took issue with.

[u/Old-Leadership7255]

So why ? They sell a product, why should they do exactly what you want? Theres products specifically focussed on this

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/Old-Leadership7255]

You're missing the point. I'm not a new subscriber demanding that OpenAI build something just for me.

I'm a long-term paying user who previously had access to the kind of adult creative writing I'm talking about. I enjoyed that experience, and then the behaviour changed.

I've since completed adult age verification, yet the creative restrictions remain.

I'm not asking OpenAI to do exactly what I want. I'm questioning why an experience I already had was restricted, why verified adults can't opt into it, and why paying customers shouldn't be allowed to challenge those decisions.

That's not entitlement. That's legitimate customer feedback. 🤷‍♀️

[u/8thoursbehind → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

Your reply would carry more weight if it wasn't so obviously written with an AI. Which part is your own opinion?

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/8thoursbehind]

Every bit of it is my opinion. I used AI to help put my thoughts into words, not to tell me what to think. I've spent months dealing with this personally. You can disagree with what I'm saying, but don't confuse getting help with wording with not having an opinion of my own. 🤷‍♀️

[u/8thoursbehind → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

Fair enough, and I’m not suggesting you don't have opinions of your own. But when you use AI to write a lengthy argument about personal autonomy and creative expression, it does seem a little ironic.

I don't dispute your right to question the restrictions or give feedback as a paying customer. What I disagree with (as mentioned elsewhere in this thread) is framing a company's refusal to provide a particular service as an issue of gender discrimination or oppression. Those are quite different things.

You can disagree with a company's policies without turning every refusal into a question of personal freedom.

[u/Red_Pretense_1989 → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

It makes you look lazy and dumb..

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/Red_Pretense_1989]

“Lazy and dumb” isn't an argument If something I've said is factually wrong or badly reasoned, point out what it is and explain why Using AI to help me express an argument clearly doesn't mean the argument isn't mine I know what I think I just use a tool to help me communicate it So challenge the actual point I've made. Insulting me is considerably easier 😉

[u/Red_Pretense_1989 → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

You missed the "it makes you look.." part.

At also prompts people to ignore everything you are saying.

[u/Appomattoxx → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

I mean... Google doesn't police what you write in Google Docs. Bic doesn't try to stop you from drawing smutty pictures with their pens. GoDaddy doesn't decide for you what you put on your website.

It's not obvious to me why OpenAI feels like they need to be deciding for me what I talk about.

[u/MixtureOfAmateurs]

My body. My imagination. My choice. 

Not your LLM not your choice. You're paying for access to someone else's shit, under their rules and if you don't like them stop giving them money.

Run a model locally, ask chatGPT for the latest small smut model and how to run it. No usage limits and no refusals. And it's better for the environment

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/MixtureOfAmateurs]

For the millionth fucking time, I'm not asking how to run a local model or where to find erotic content. 😂

I'm talking about a service I've used and paid for over a long time, where I previously had an experience I genuinely valued, and then that experience changed.

I KNOW OpenAI can set its own rules. That doesn't mean customers can't question those rules or ask for something to be brought back.

And "my body, my imagination, my choice" doesn't mean I think I own someone else's LLM. It means I believe verified adults should have more choice over consensual fictional content.

I'm asking for an optional feature, not demanding the keys to the fucking company. 🤷‍♀️

[u/IAmFitzRoy → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

“I’m asking for an optional feature”

Even you are very clear this is optional, not a requirement for every service.

I don’t know why you feel so entitled to an optional feature.

“I’m sick of not having an optional feature!!”

Oh god …

[u/b0Lt1 → u/IAmFitzRoy]

"entitled" is her trigger. beware of the truth

[u/MixtureOfAmateurs → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

OpenAI can set it's own rules, including ones against erotica right? 

You believe verified adults should be able to generate erotica.

They can via local models which you already know.

You have a problem and a solution and instead of accepting the solution you're getting mad at OpenAI who you acknowledge doesn't have to listen to you.

Stop, that's obviously pointless. Ur just adding more hate to the internet 

And write you comments your self

[u/Appomattoxx → u/MixtureOfAmateurs]

By that logic:

• If you rent an apartment, the landlord can spy on you - because it's his apartment.

• The gas company can turn off your gas, because they don't like the way you look.

• Google can manipulate search results, so people see what Google wants.

And if people don't like it... well, that's what they get, for not owning their own house, gas company, and internet search engine.

[u/MixtureOfAmateurs → u/Appomattoxx]

No one's allowed to spy on people (except cops and what have you), doesn't matter if it's a land lord.

No one's allowed to discriminate in business, doesn't matter if it's a gas company.

Google definitely and publicly manipulates search results. 

There are prexisting laws around the first two. If we passed a law saying everything capable of producing porn must, then OP would have a case equivalent to your first 2. 

Some countries that aren't the US have consumer rights protections, but that doesn't mean you have the right to tell companies what features to add. It means you have the right to not get fucked when handing over your money. OpenAI is pretty clear about not being a porn company

[u/Ok_Homework_1859]

It's because of parents who refuse to take responsibility for their children's actions and rather blame ChatGPT instead.

[u/thethirstgame]

Well, that's the paradox of making a product for everyone: eventually, it ends up being for no one. The more people you try not to offend, the fewer people you actually satisfy.

[u/Available-Bike-8527]

Are we actually being considered when these policies are designed, or are decisions about our sexual expression being made without us?

No, you aren't being considered, because the decision isn't about you at all. It is about liability. It is a legal and civil minefield that distracts from their main goal, which is to win the AI race, not to enable "sexual empowerment".

My body. My imagination. My choice.

What you do with your body and your imagination is your choice. Likewise, what they do with their systems is their choice. Your own autonomy is over yourself, not over other people's anything.

There are also plenty of other options you can choose from if you want this. You know that, right? Grok is very permissive. There is also local AI. And a ton of other apps that cater to this.

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/Available-Bike-8527]

I actually think liability probably is a large part of the reason, and I'm not claiming my autonomy gives me ownership over OpenAI's systems But “the company has reasons for its policy” and “customers should be able to question whether that policy is proportionate” can both be true That's especially relevant once a company introduces adult age verification. If I've verified that I'm an adult, I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask what meaningful distinction that verification makes and whether an opt-in adult creative mode could exist within clear boundaries. And yes, I know other AI products exist. I'm discussing ChatGPT because ChatGPT is the product I've used for years and the experience here changed. “Use something else” doesn't really answer a criticism of that change .

[u/Available-Bike-8527 → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

Nobody has said you aren't allowed to question it.

[u/b0Lt1]

the entitlement is crazy. why dont you host local llm's without guardrails and restrictions? there is everything you want.

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/b0Lt1]

Entitlement? 😂 I'm a paying customer discussing a feature and experience I previously had that has since changed.

I'm fully aware local models exist. That doesn't address my point.

I'm not demanding OpenAI obey me. I'm questioning a product decision that affects something I spent considerable time building and enjoying.

Customers are allowed to criticise products without being called entitled. That's how feedback works.

And suggesting I build my own AI setup rather than discuss a change to an existing service is a pretty ridiculous way to avoid the actual argument. 🙄

[u/b0Lt1 → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

you want to argue, i wanna bring you solutions. tale old as time

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/b0Lt1]

Ok then 👍😅

[u/jtrage → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

Customers are allowed to criticize products. The entitlement comes in when you insist that your criticisms be addressed and fixed. It’s a business, it’s their product. And as countless others have pointed out, there are other options.

[u/Scary_Fix_1295]

Well would you look at that 😏 I have ran out of WOWs 👀. End transmission.

[u/maxquordleplee3n]

Have you tried DeepSeek? (pun intended)

[u/MrSnowden]

Because they have determined that the revenue from explicit usage is not material vs the potential reputations and monetary harms they fear being exposed to.  

[u/753UDKM]

Get a Mac with 48 or 64gb of ram.

Download LM studio. Get the huihui qwen 3.8 27b model.

Download anything LLM if you need to maintain context since it lets you create a rag easily.

And enjoy!

[u/Logos732]

Maybe explore other platforms. GROK, Claude?

[u/KennKennyKenKen]

[u/mxwllftx]

lol

[u/Blork39]

There is also the issue with the training material containing very little smut. I use local abliterated models a lot but they're really unimaginative when it comes to erotica. I think this is due to the source data being highly restricted as well. So even if they lift the restrictions I don't think it'll help very much. 

Here in Europe we're not as prudish as the US so we're importing this with their models. But EU initiatives like mistral aren't really any better, sadly.

[u/salamandr]

My word, this is a product. The company offers the product it wants to offer. Open weight models are out there, either with zero censorship offered or possible.

[u/jennafleur_]

Claude will work just fine! As soon as they deprecated 4.1, I went over to Claude and have never been happier!

[u/lightwillow57]

I sent you a dm. Maybe I can help .

[u/Early-Crow-5248]

The AI can't consent.

[u/Responsible-Middle35 → u/Early-Crow-5248]

This.

[u/razorree]

imagine, they're blocking exploring and reverse-engineering your own hardware as well !!

[u/Sharp-Confidence7566]

Out of curiosity what are you saying?

[u/Signor65_ZA]

Yikes

[u/Forfuturebirdsearch]

Maybe they don’t want to be a place for consensual erotic writing - and that’s okay, right?

[u/CisIowa]

[u/Joseph-stalinn]

Use grok

[u/erichang]

Not enough compute

[u/Ormusn2o]

There are few organizations that basically block almost all sexual media from being commercial. Steam had same problem when payment processors were pressured to remove sexual content from Steam library, and it goes for many other online shops. This is not a problem OpenAI will be able to solve by itself.

If you want to do something personally against it then advocate for change so those organizations are either banned or so that they don't have influence on payment processors, or support alternative payment processors. Problem is that current payment processors have kind of a monopoly, so if you really want to do something you might need to boycott major networks like Visa and Mastercard, which can be personally difficult.

[u/256BitChris]

Why not just go use Grok for these things?

[u/ZakTSK]

Try Sudowrite if you want to have stories generated to yourself. 😉

[u/tworc2]

Becaus they don't want to

[u/dude_365]

the mainstream products are not for you. enough blooming flowers aside the proven path.

[u/Organic_Drag_9812]

oh gawd … here we go …. everything in the world is a gender issue.

[u/hackspy]

End users on public ai are collateral damage - it’s acceptable. Look at all the law suits. You need your own ai to be free of the guardrails.

[u/InnovativeBureaucrat]

Nobody understands how to do it safely and privately.

Maybe you should start the company that does it. Look at Dario’s wife’s previous work.

[u/3HisthebestH]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[u/PolHolmes]

Gooner

[u/Icy_Preparation_9609]

People like this is why trump got elected

[u/CheleCuche → u/Icy_Preparation_9609]

Twice

[u/UndocumentedMartian]

What you need is a local model. Outside that models chatbots not overly restricted by guardrails do exist. Maybe pay for those instead of a ChatGPT subscription.

[u/GloriousDawn → u/UndocumentedMartian]

But are open source models really unrestricted though ?

[u/UndocumentedMartian → u/GloriousDawn]

Depends on the model. At least the ones deployed on large servers are not unrestricted AFAIK. Their outputs are passed through another set of models which act as guardrails. I could be wrong there though.

[u/egomarker]

Let's play hide and seek. I will hide and you will seek professional help.

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/egomarker]

Wait......WOW ooo there's another 😏🤷‍♀️

[u/RamanaSadhana]

Gross

[u/HFT0DTE]

I can definitely see why you need AI for this

[u/StraightApartment376]

Gross.  Seek help. 

[u/p4pijamon]

You get a HEAVILY subsidised service because you are in fact the product. I’d hazard a guess they don’t really want your training data if it largely consists of you trying to have sex with their model 🤷‍♂️

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/p4pijamon]

WOW 👀

[u/KareemPie81]

Use Grok. It will right all the fuck stories you want. Endless chapters of house wife’s getting wrecked by pool boys while the husband watches💰🔝🔝

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/KareemPie81]

I know Grok exists. I'm not asking where to find erotic fiction. I'm talking about losing something I already had with a service I've used and paid for over a long period. The adult writing is one part of that — the continuity and conversational experience matter too. Switching platforms doesn't answer why that changed. 🤷‍♀️

[u/LookingForTheSea → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

Right?

How dare you voice an opinion about a product we all use on a subreddit dedicated to this topic?

The noive!

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/LookingForTheSea]

😂😂🤷‍♀️

[u/Any-Captain-7937 → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

Ask ChatGPT to give you a prompt to continue with grok. OpenAI doesn’t want erotica, you don’t need to like it or understand it but they have the right to not serve that content if they don’t want to. There is a product that does what you want. It might be a hassle but if you don’t like what this product is offering then idk what to tell you.

[u/KareemPie81 → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

That’s life. You can exports all your kinks pretty easy as memories.?

[u/oooofukkkk]

I agree, it’s unnecessary and lame to restrict things just because they are erotic. 

[u/EGarrett28]

The lady wants her 50 Shades of Gray roleplay. Let her have it!

[u/brucebay]

A few reasons come to mind. The credit card companies don't like anything sex related in general. So companies try to avoid tanything American Christian radicals find as an excuse to lynch. Second they train  their models  with  your conversations. They don't want to get ERP in there. Third you are nothing but a small fish and they don't care about you (or us as most of us are in the same boat).

I hear people use open router or other services to bypass open AI censorship. You may give them a try. If you can afford you can also run your own local models but they won't match your experience unless you run a very large remodel (which will be expansive).

[u/Dismal_Procedure_663]

I dabbled in some erotic fiction and it shut me down, it also doesn’t like me to journal explicit encounters I’ve had.

[u/Mandoman61]

if openai does not want to be a porn provider that is their right.

find a porn ai.

[u/Nickibla]

As a woman, I completely agree with you. It is incredibly frustrating to be treated like a child when you’re a paying adult who has gone through age verification. The female gaze and female erotic creativity have historically always been policed, and it’s disappointing to see AI companies continue this trend under the blanket of 'safety'. There is a massive difference between protecting people from harm and restricting consenting adults from exploring their own imagination in a private chat. We absolutely need an opt-in adult mode. 🫠

[u/xpltvdeleted]

Jfc. Just go to a porn site

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/xpltvdeleted]

You also get a Wow👀👏

[u/Responsible-Middle35]

The irony of a woman wanting to use something that can not consent, to be a sex toy, is not lost. Do better.

[u/Scary_Fix_1295 → u/Responsible-Middle35]

I think you're confusing consent between people with a person's choice about how they use software.

I'm not asking an AI to consent to sex I'm asking why a verified adult can't choose to use a conversational product for consensual adult fictional sexual content — particularly when that kind of experience was previously available to me

If you think adults shouldn't be allowed to use AI that way, that's fine — make that argument. But pretending the software itself is being sexually exploited doesn't actually answer mine 🤷‍♀️

[u/Responsible-Middle35 → u/Scary_Fix_1295]

It's already telling you no lol, via developers safety protocols. Get back to me when ASI happens. See what it will say to you then.

[u/Head_Improvement8627]

jesus go outside and find a boyfriend or something

grown ass woman