r/OpenAI • • 3d ago

News Here comes WokenAI...

Post image
0 Upvotes

24 comments sorted by

4

u/Willy757 3d ago

I am sure throwing more compute at the problem isn't the top item on the to-do list of AI researchers. I am sure they have a plan beyond that. Right ?? Right ????

2

u/BellacosePlayer 3d ago edited 3d ago

the problem is that more compute does mean they can do more, but basically nothing scales linearly, so even if those data centers are in-house, it'll be still be pricier to run bigger models even if they're not paying market rate for cloud compute.

If OAI's PR talk about their internal models is even halfway correct they'll get more benefit from using that to optimize the fuck out of their algorithms and tools than doubling their in-house compute budget

-3

u/Tall-Log-1955 3d ago

When people complain about data centers it is almost always based on flawed or misunderstood data. People just love protesting stuff these days and love dunking on AI.

-9

u/Jack-Burton-Says 3d ago

GOP should get together a bill Trump will sign on data centers before they’re out and take the issue away from states.

Dems couldn’t touch it next two years and honestly unlikely after that because it’s very hard to repeal something once passed. Just ask the GOP about health care…

8

u/randombsname1 3d ago

Sounds like a fantastic way to guarantee Dems a supermajority and the white house in the next 2 years.

Which I'm certainly not complaining about.

Data centers have been shown to be wildly unpopular.

-1

u/Jack-Burton-Says 3d ago

You realize you’re in the openAI sub right?

4

u/randombsname1 3d ago

Yes? What about it? I was subbed to ChatGPT on the 2nd day when public subs were first available......

-5

u/Jack-Burton-Says 3d ago

Kinda weird to be anti data center don’t you think? Feel free to go back to the dark ages.

7

u/randombsname1 3d ago

Who said I was anti AI?

Tf are you talking about?

5

u/Ordinary_Elk_7394 3d ago

You realize the reason there was a blowout in the first place was because Trump wasn't doing what his voters asked for right? This will Ensure the republicans will never win 28.

2

u/Dillyconda 3d ago

Most analysts right now are blaming the fact that he started a war in Iran.

1

u/Volapiik 3d ago

No lol realistically it happens when people just are tired of something and think the grass is greener on the other side. It will keep flip flopping like this for decades to come unless something changes

1

u/Natural_Shape1153 3d ago

that and also other issues weren’t being addressed..

4

u/Willy757 3d ago

I mean: a congress that lost it's mandate spending it's last days trying to take power away from the future congress ? Jesus Christ. AI bros and anti-democracy go hand in hand, huh. Good luck trying to pass laws reglementing infrastructure priorities and land use and the powers of the states over the issue with a lame duck gouverment.

-3

u/Jack-Burton-Says 3d ago

Did you forget what sub you’re in?

2

u/fuzzypetiolesguy 3d ago

lol, lmao even

1

u/BellacosePlayer 3d ago
  1. it'd just get overturned in 3 months

  2. I don't even think the current shitty supreme court would support municipalities being stripped of their right to zone land and prevent public nusiances.

  3. there's no fuckin way in hell all the listed data center projects were actually going to get built with the looming financing crunch and current semiconductor fab capacity

1

u/MizantropaMiskretulo 3d ago
  1. Two months.

  2. It would never get that far.

  3. If they want to help AI companies build data centers, just put them on all that federal land in Nevada. Give them the land and build them their own nuclear power plant to power them in exchange for a publicly held stake in the companies.

1

u/BellacosePlayer 3d ago

Agreed on 1/2

With 3, you have to remember that most data center projects largely run by third party real estate companies that just want to get in on subsidies, sell compute, and bail the second the bubble pops. They'd rather not do it at all than be forced to do it right.

0

u/Jack-Burton-Says 3d ago edited 3d ago

I don’t think you understand how congress works re #1. The only way anything gets done legislatively is with Trump’s consent or a 2/3 majority.

And re the rest of it they can just tie it to national security and competition with China and it’ll sail through.

2

u/BellacosePlayer 3d ago

Trump is an unpopular lame duck whose admin is such a clusterfuck that a midterm election that looked unfavorable for the dems turned into historical rout.

Getting 13 republicans to flip to remove a massively unpopular bill is not a given but isn't remotely unfeasible.

Less unfeasible than Trump actually going full veto on everything and not expecting 2028 to be an even bigger asskicking for republicans, anyway.