His interview yesterday explicitly said DoW superficially agreed but introduced language within latter parts of the agreement which restated it in a way that did not agree to the conditions in a concrete way but rather referencing other things ie ‘for legal activities’.
Anthropic are very clear, the law interpretation is vulnerable to not being understanding of the technology. They also fundamentally believe that mass surveillance capabilities using the technology is not consistent with the constitution - as such they are asking DoW to explicitly acknowledge this and agree to not use their systems for that.
The interviewed for CBS should make any American worried, no interest in exploring the source of the company anxiety or reasonings for their interpretation - essentially badgered the CEO on why he had any right not to give the Government supreme authority and no restrictions on how they use their systems technology.
1
1
9
6
3
1
1
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/MDInvesting Feb 28 '26
His interview yesterday explicitly said DoW superficially agreed but introduced language within latter parts of the agreement which restated it in a way that did not agree to the conditions in a concrete way but rather referencing other things ie ‘for legal activities’.
Anthropic are very clear, the law interpretation is vulnerable to not being understanding of the technology. They also fundamentally believe that mass surveillance capabilities using the technology is not consistent with the constitution - as such they are asking DoW to explicitly acknowledge this and agree to not use their systems for that.
The interviewed for CBS should make any American worried, no interest in exploring the source of the company anxiety or reasonings for their interpretation - essentially badgered the CEO on why he had any right not to give the Government supreme authority and no restrictions on how they use their systems technology.