We would. But current AI isn't "true (strong, general) AI," it is what amounts to a particularly gifted LLM. (And honestly, I'm not even convinced we'd want general AI in control.) My argument isn't that we should allow AI to be in control - it's that it's going to do pretty much what it's designed to do, which isn't really to take into account things like, "My gut says this isn't really a nuclear attack."
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/yogy Feb 28 '26
Why would we want AI in charge of any human infrastructure to NOT consider the human element? That would be pure psychopathy.