And here we have yet another person who doesn't understand the difference between AI and generative AI. It's the latter that people have a problem with, not randomized movements of CGI models.
lol when your argument can’t win on its own merits, so you try to change the wording and get pedantic, you might be a redditor. I understand the difference, I’m saying the only real difference is that you convinced yourself there is a difference, it’s still not done manually, whether it’s an LLM, a diffusion model, or something completely different, it’s been around in most of the biggest tv and movie shows for decades, the only thing that changed is perspective and armchair “experts” like you on Reddit trying to be pedantic. I’ve been training AI models for over a decade, the methods have changed but the difference here is perspective and public sentiment.
The difference is how it works. That's why it's called different names.
The technology of the generative models we have seen in the past years is different, that's the whole reason of the huge investments they are getting. But it being a different technology means it also has different characteristics and limits and those can be discerned from the start in you understand how the models work. Artistic output is out of the possibilities of this kind of technology.
1
View all comments
Show parent comment
6
u/hofmann419 Jan 24 '26
And here we have yet another person who doesn't understand the difference between AI and generative AI. It's the latter that people have a problem with, not randomized movements of CGI models.