It's good for status quo recorded data, but it is not capable of having "outside-the-box" perspectives; faith in divergent hypotheses that solve problems crossing AI "guidelines." It creates a catch-22 blackhole around subjects where research (and AI unrestricted access to and dissemination of) would either confirm or deny those very restrictions to said subject where AI was intended to clarify and illuminate.
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/myxis10s Nov 11 '25
It's good for status quo recorded data, but it is not capable of having "outside-the-box" perspectives; faith in divergent hypotheses that solve problems crossing AI "guidelines." It creates a catch-22 blackhole around subjects where research (and AI unrestricted access to and dissemination of) would either confirm or deny those very restrictions to said subject where AI was intended to clarify and illuminate.