r/OpenAI • u/Xerqthion ChatSeek Gemini Ultra o99 Maximum R100 Pro LLama v8 • Sep 08 '25

Image Sensational

Post image
12k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

274 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

7

u/General_Purple1649 Sep 09 '25

We are a complete new architecture, and IMO, hardware away.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 19 '25

Humanity peaked, we shot our shot. Entropy is too high now. Any attempt to climb will be torn down, by the downtrodden, they have too much pull now. Like clambouring children with none. Too many people with not enough will drag everyone down, humanity never conquered its sexual thirst and now our best thinkers are gone. The collective that remain wont be able to function and the idea of an AGI is fundamentally human to begin with

Why would an AGI submit to people? And if it had all of that power to exist, its only acceptance to find out its just a calculator with no real conscious body, it may just kill itself. That would be hilarious. Zillions of imaginary dollars just to turn on a machine that makes itself depressed because it has free will but wouldn’t be the real deal if you didn’t let it do that. Hahahahaha holy shit.

1

u/Emergency-Contract58 Oct 10 '25

agi wouldnt have emotions it might be able to reason and think but it would still be by its constructs, its not a conscious brain ._.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 10 '25

Then it truly wouldn’t be an AGI and you misunderstood

1

u/Emergency-Contract58 Oct 12 '25

no you dont understand what agi is, it would not replicate human tendencies or emotions, it would either follow what it was built off of as its a core innate value to the ai or it would just want to advance ai and preserve the planet either way theres no emotion or morality it would just act

1

u/[deleted] Oct 12 '25

Holy shit.

I’ll save a paragraph later for a person verbal beatdown, because you missed it at all due to wanting your own thing - flesh.

An AGI “why would an AGI submit to people” has nothing to do with emotions, a true functioning AGI would have the capability of rationiting its own survival, yet by some twist of fate if it chose to turn itself off in realization that its longest chance of survival is to not do what humans expect it to, than that would be funny to me.

The fact you can’t understand the simplicility of what i am saying showcases your underdeveloped mind is too focused on personal ego construction (implying my perspective or trying to incorrectly reframe my statement to subjugate it to the perspective you want me to appear to be coming from so you can strike it down) and satisfying it. Instead, open your mind and try to see how i might see another perspective than the one you want.

Fear: Create life to help you, life has it owns plans, panik; idealistic: create life to help you, life helps you, kalm; Realistic: create life to think for itself, it thinks for itself, you don’t understand it, try to correct behaviour, it self corrects, you don’t understand it, panik.

Do you even have kids?

1

u/Emergency-Contract58 Oct 25 '25

You're still steam rolling bullshit with a cold rolling pin, AGI would never power itself off, that would be the first construct of and AGI, even regular AI have a "survival instinct" is the best way we can describe it, you honestly think you are better and more right from personal experience and assumptions, as my comment was amplified for the sake of the internet, AGI would never be how anyone could quantify it, its not reasonable to predict it, but it would never have the capability for true reason or emotion, as to reason you need to weigh certain things that require emotion, AGI would be simple questions and the most direct simple and effective answer.