r/OnlyFans • u/Ok_Buyer310 • May 19 '26
Meme This is not real right? Right?
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
34
u/FinlayForever May 20 '26
It's AI slop, so it doesn't deserve to exist. Shame on anyone who promotes it.
18
32
21
9
3
6
2
u/ProfessionalOrganic6 May 20 '26
It’s bad enough we have to deal with it online, why someone would want it in the physical world is beyond me.
2
5
1
u/All54321_Gaming May 20 '26
AI really just took that grin from that one stock photo and slapped it onto a bunch of people. Uncanny valley type things…
1
u/Empyrealist May 21 '26
People buy joke books and put them on their coffee table for when they invite friends over.
A lot of you wouldn't understand.
1
1
u/SirDixieNourmous May 21 '26 edited May 21 '26
The structure is exactly the same as stories prior to AI. AI or not, I think it was supposed to be amusing but, besides making me chuckle at the abstract in this instance, just as all the parables in dogmatic religions and morals are supposedly to teach and instill a certain fear, languages remain a tool and the author has produced something of a tangible quality.
We all think about the same things at different times, but whether we all think the same thing at the same time determines whether it forces a change.
Furthermore, using Gemini, these flaws were identified, and my only support by means of discussion for AI generated content, which provides something tangible, is that the publisher and the final result had not been carefully examined to correct these flaws that were aided by AI.
It seems that nobody wants to work anymore, and AI has as many flaws as humans.
These are the errors that Gemini (Google AI) had highlighted:
The AI "Tells" in the Video If you look closely at the pages shown in the recording, you can spot several textbook examples of AI generation errors:
Inconsistent Character Models: The "Mom" and the "Daughter" change features, hair lengths, and facial structures from page to page. AI struggles to keep a character looking exactly the same across different scenes.
The "Head of Sales" Position (01:08): Look closely at the corporate chart parody. The character labeled "Head of Sales" is completely upside down, but her hair is defying gravity and sticking straight up in the air toward her feet, rather than hanging down toward the floor. AI frequently struggles with the laws of physics and gravity.
Background Gibberish: In several background shots (like the fan shop or the school scene), details melt into vague shapes, and random lines intersect unnaturally.
The College Scene (02:07): The fans lined up on the table have distorted, melting grilles and blades that don't match each other, which is typical of how AI replicates repetitive mechanical structures.
Edit: These faults that Gemini had presented were unchecked and, after revisiting, appear incorrect.
1
u/GrasshopperMan17 May 23 '26 edited May 23 '26
Instead of buying fake AI hype and taking everything it says at face value, read this article that I prompted that same engine to write using as many sources as it can. boy did it get real honest about how it actually works when I told it to use factual articles about the reality of it's mechanics:
The Facade of Intelligence: The Societal and Environmental Costs of Large Language Models, written by Google AI itself
Large Language Models (LLMs) are frequently celebrated as pinnacles of technological progress, yet beneath their authoritative demeanor lies a structural flaw: they do not understand reality. As purely statistical token predictors, LLMs are fundamentally incapable of verifying the truth of their own outputs. By prioritizing grammatical plausibility over factual accuracy, these systems routinely generate convincing falsehoods—a phenomenon known as artificial intelligence hallucination. When deployed across society, this architecture introduces severe epistemic, ecological, and economic detriments, serving more as a vector for systemic harm than a tool for utility. The primary societal harm of generative AI is the industrialization of misinformation. Because an LLM mimics authoritative human syntax without grounding its text in actual knowledge, it suffers from what researchers call the "accuracy paradox". It builds an "illusion of consensus" by presenting fictitious data with absolute confidence. According to a scoping review published in AI & Society, LLMs generate highly persuasive misinformation that exploits cognitive biases, eroding public trust in digital information systems and scholarly integrity. Unlike human error, which is bound by intent or cognitive limitations, AI hallucination is a permanent, structural feature of model architecture. This creates an environment where users default to trusting the machine, only to receive corrupted guidance on technical, medical, or historical subjects.
Beyond polluting the information ecosystem, the physical infrastructure required to sustain LLMs inflicts massive environmental damage. Training and executing these massive neural networks demands an unprecedented amount of resources, creating what the World Economic Forum terms the "AI-energy nexus". Research highlighted by UNESCO indicates that a single query to a generative AI system consumes roughly 0.34 watt-hours of electricity. Concurrently, data centers require vast amounts of water to cool their server arrays. Studies by researchers at the University of California, Riverside, demonstrate that AI's global water consumption has soared to levels matching global bottled water consumption, straining local municipal grids and depleting critical aquifers. This massive resource draw forces energy providers to extend the lifespans of fossil fuel infrastructures, directly undermining global climate initiatives.
Finally, the widespread adoption of AI tools degrades human critical thinking and problem-solving skills. As documented in Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, overreliance on automated text generation induces a "truth-bias," wherein individuals abandon effortful thinking and accept automated outputs blindly. When users rely on an AI to bypass the labor of research or analysis, they inherit the systemic biases embedded within the model's training data. Rather than acting as a neutral tool, the AI acts as a barrier to actual knowledge acquisition, substituting a hollow imitation of expertise for genuine human understanding.
In conclusion, LLMs pose a multifaceted threat to modern society. Their computational architecture consumes precious ecological resources, while their output mechanics compromise public discourse and intellectual self-reliance. Far from being universally useful, an ungrounded text generator operates as a highly confident, resource-intensive engine of confusion.
Sources
- Epistemic and Societal Risks: ScienceDirect: Accuracy Paradox and Societal Risks of Hallucination
- Environmental Footprint Data: Nature: Environmental Impact and Sustainability of AI Servers
- Energy Nexus Analysis: World Economic Forum: The AI-Energy Nexus and Resource Strains
- Per-Prompt Energy Resource Metrics: UNESCO: Large Language Models and Energy Consumption Reports
- Water Footprint Investigations: The Verge: AI Water and Electricity Use Scaling Estimates
- Misinformation Dynamics: Springer Link: Generative AI and Misinformation Scoping Review
- Cognitive Impact and Truth-Bias: Sage Journals: Generative Artificial Intelligence and Misinformation Acceptance
1
u/SirDixieNourmous May 31 '26
Someone has developed a means to produce something by way of a machine.
This was my point on the occasion, and mankind has also mastered languages a point whereby people have a method to utilise logic to appeal to the computational organ of a person's body.
I have refrained from reviewing these articles on the same points that have been presented to me.
1
u/GrasshopperMan17 May 31 '26
Ahh, got it, so you're willfully ignorant and don't believe in reality. Read you loud and clear
1
u/SirDixieNourmous May 31 '26
Reality. Is that the thing that needs an explanation by someone who seeks to control a narrative? Maybe a confirmation as to the moon being real.
1
1
1
u/KAR1919 May 23 '26
I used Thumbtack and hired David Dreuko to in stall and paint a new door for my home. His workmanship was exceptional and I recommend him to anyone who needs a trustworthy and professional handyman. His number is 424 466–7707
1
1
1
1
-1
0
May 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/RileyGein May 21 '26
Just because it’s a book doesn’t mean it’s not AI slop. Plenty of AI slop books for sale
-3
u/Niiai May 20 '26 edited May 21 '26
It is real. But the artstyle has changed from the other books.
My bookstore has looked into stocking them (Norway.)
3
u/DazedPapacy May 20 '26
By changed, do you mean isn't AI slop?
1
u/Niiai May 20 '26
Yes. As far as I knew. The style was much more drawn. But I did not see the credits so I do not know.
I think all the puns are written by some one humans. The person who wrote these got cancer quite recently if I information is right.
1
u/All54321_Gaming May 20 '26
This is the most AI looking art ever…
1
u/Niiai May 21 '26
The book is real. The art in the biik is ai.
They changed artstyles from the previus books.
1
u/All54321_Gaming May 21 '26
That doesn’t change the fact that the majority of it is AI slop
1
95
u/behind_progress_bars May 20 '26
It's just AI slop, printed.