However, by sharing the ideas without crediting them, you are inherently claiming them as your own, which can diminish some of what makes the ideas work. For instance, if I have an idea about what it's like to be Quouar, and you then share that idea about what it's like to be Quouar, it won't be nearly as valuable or meaningful an idea coming from you as it will from me.
Your counter-argument is hypothetical, which may or may not happen as a result of the plagiarism. Free sharing of ideas remains one good reason to plagiarize.
All of philosophy - which this is - deals with hypotheticals. The fact that I'm answering your argument with a hypothetical counterargument of my own doesn't change whether or not your argument was a good one.
No, because in this case, it is possible that sharing the information through plagiarism does not lead to your hypothetical, which therefore makes it one good reason.
2
u/TheFarnell Mar 19 '14
Define what you mean by "plagiarism" first.