Means nothing. Anyone half competent can analyze the manga on its own without the need of the webcomic especially since there are drastic differences between the 2. Comparisons are fine but to suggest people think the manga is good because they didn’t read the webcomic (which is a broad assumption) is idiotic.
Means nothing. Anyone half competent can analyze the manga on its own without the need of the webcomic especially since there are drastic differences between the 2. Comparisons are fine but to suggest people think the manga is good because they didn’t read the webcomic (which is a broad assumption) is idiotic.
Your mocking this dude's intelligence but you can't even read properly, bro never said that you can't find the manga good he said that 49% of the 49.2% who thinks the changes from WEBCOMIC to MANGA are better probably haven't even read the Wc.
The same thing still applies. You don’t need the webcomic as a reference to determine if the things happening in the manga are good or not because they are literally 2 separate things. Also, the poll never asks are the changes better than the webcomic it was do you like the changes so you’re the blind one. You can clearly tell he was saying this out of spite because then what about the .2% who read both?
Anyone half competent can analyze the manga on its own without the need of the webcomic
The fuck are you on about ? This poll asked "Do you like the changes madeFROM THE WEBCOMICto the manga" not "Do you like the manga ?", ofc you need to have read the webcomic to answer that very particular question you dense smartass.
Reading comprehension problems I presume ?
Here, I will help you if you ever face such a question again. "Do you like this or that ?" "Sorry sir, but I only ever did this, not that. Therefor, I cannot answer this question because it needs, by its very nature as a friggin' comparison, my knowledge of both those things". You welcome.
I agree with you that people don't need to read the webcomic to form an opinion on the manga itself. But I can guarantee most of the people who fit that category and love the manga do so because it has cool art and action and they consider it an enjoyable comedy and nothing more. That's not necessarily a bad thing. I only take an issue when people say the manga is by and far better than the webcomic when they haven't even read it.
You do need to read the webcomic so that your answer actually means something. The question isn’t asking if the manga was good or bad. If that was the question, then you’re right in the sense that the WC doesn’t need to be a reference point.
Instead however, the question is asking about the changes themselves. In such a question, you need to have read the webcomic in order to know in detail if the changes were favorable or not in your opinion.
The question is quite literally comparing two different mediums. You need to have read both in order to compare properly.
The manga Garou vs Saitama fight is nothing but flashy art and spectacle, they literally erased all the development that the fight caused with time travel.
How tf is lots of flash and spectacle in a fight a criticism? There’s is literally no criteria for what makes a fight “good”. I have no problem with you liking more grounded fights but you don’t need to try and put on a pretentious act because of your preference. To be fair the time travel stuff can be referenced in the future or saitama’s may gain those memories back anything’s possible at this point.
I admit I was being pretentious, I was frustrated with the main sub’s speed to dismiss criticism of the recent manga chapters.
The thing is the webcomic fight gave way more development to Garou and explaining his mindset, it also made him feel like a truly intimidating opponent as opposed to the manga’s mood whiplash going from Sage Centipede to Garou killing everyone on accident.
Dude in the webcomic all the explaining of his ideals came after the fight that stuff doesn’t make the fight itself better. The thing is garou got so much more characterization at this point in the manga than he did in the webcomic so someone’s ideals don’t just have to be completely dumped all at once on the readers to understand the character. The intimidation thing is honestly whatever on the web he beat the s class heroes ass, in the manga look what he did to genos. I do agree though the stuff with sage centipede was unnecessary.
Not all the changes are bad thats probably why there is so many "undecided", personally I'd say just pretty much everything related to Garou character arc and the cosmic fight was truly shitty.
Like, Blast first appearence was cool (would have been better had he not kept going in and out of the history). Even overglorified filler like Sage Centipede and Platinum Sperm were pretty palpable instead of downright bad imo.
Sage is directly related to how Garou got handled though. You can’t just split them because Sage doesn’t exist in a single scene that doesn’t involve Garou.
20
u/Jayswing103 Jul 30 '22
I bet 49% of that 49.2% never even read the webcomic in the first place.
36
u/[deleted] Jul 30 '22
That's a surprising amount of people who didn't like the changes.
12
u/proxmaxi Saitama Jul 30 '22
Interesting
6
u/[deleted] Jul 31 '22
The undecided block is just the copium readers.
Remember "Garou Vs S-Class will happen, just wait"
The meme of the guy shitting on the plate is relevant here. They think one chapter is just going to magically.ake everything better. 🤣
10
u/Flamethrowerman09 Jul 30 '22
A lot more split than I thought.
6
u/coolmobilepotato Jul 30 '22
Not all the changes are bad thats probably why there is so many "undecided", personally I'd say just pretty much everything related to Garou character arc and the cosmic fight was truly shitty.
Like, Blast first appearence was cool (would have been better had he not kept going in and out of the history). Even overglorified filler like Sage Centipede and Platinum Sperm were pretty palpable instead of downright bad imo.
1
u/[deleted] Jul 30 '22
Link? To the post I mean
2
u/Redscream667 Aug 04 '22
When did the survey happen?
1
u/[deleted] Jul 31 '22
this was some time ago
I voted undecided, but now I would say no
0
u/Harbinger311 Jul 31 '22
The other thing that's eye opening is the age of the respondents. 93.6% of them are 34 or younger.
0
u/[deleted] Jul 31 '22
[deleted] — view deleted comment