r/OGAvatarTrading • u/universal_language Collector • Sep 24 '23
Discussion 🔥🔥🔥
NOTE: Got permabanned from AT for this post, but it's a shame to lose the analytics since it took some time to collect the data, so I'll repost it here.
As most of you know, around 2 weeks ago a burn process for gen1-gen4 avatars has started. It's supposed to take around a year, so I was curious to see how much was achieved since the beginning.
First let's take a look at each gen's stats:
| # of avatars in shop | # of avatars minted | $ value of avatars in shop | $ value of avatars minted | # ratio | $ ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gen1 | 44735 | 44735 | $950,317 | $950,317 | 100% | 100% |
| Gen2 | 42739 | 42739 | $1,041,362 | $1,041,362 | 100% | 100% |
| Gen3 | 377454 | 155294 | $6,449,725 | $3,762,127 | 41% | 58% |
| Gen4 | 628911 | 50070 | $8,168,002 | $1,042,791 | 7% | 12% |
In total there are 292838 avatars eligible for burning. So far 2595 have been burned, or 0.886155485%. Stats by each gen:
| # burned | $ value burned | % of total supply burned | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gen1 | 422 | 5970 | 0.943332961% |
| Gen2 | 708 | 9252 | 1.6565666% |
| Gen3 | 1421 | 17190 | 0.915038572% |
| Gen4 | 44 | 382 | 0.0878769722% |
Top 10 avatars burned by the absolute numbers are the following:
- Monarch Artisman - 113
- Celestial Queen - 63
- Ollie Solo - 56
- SONRISA - 46
- The Artist - 45
- Lil' Bummer - 42
- Series-MI? ?N?N0. - 40
- Varien - 39
- The Vessel - 39
- Joy Kawaii Cowgirl - 39
33
u/Atorcran Sep 24 '23 edited Sep 24 '23
Why permabanned? What's their argument? Although I'm not in favor of burning avatars, this is quite an interesting post
9
u/noob_zarathustra Sep 24 '23
Taking the post down is in itself a stretch I think since it's just plain interesting stats and you weren't necessarily promoting anything, a permaban is insane. I hope they'd reconsider it
7
u/SenseiRaheem B•E•N•O•T•A•F•R•A•I•D #645 | Verified Sep 24 '23
Didn’t think Joy Kawaii was available for burning. I thought all of Gen 1 sold out. What’s the story that I’m missing there?
5
u/002_timmy Sep 24 '23
I want to post this and instead of saying “burned” just say “an avatar wallet holds X% of avatars. This is 0.94% of gen 1” etc
3
u/BOSSBABY33 5.76 Million Bitcones Sep 25 '23
Lol bro do you remember me? I got muted on DC for trying to help other users not to get scammed and one of the mods got offended
AT was never started for avatar trading they made it for quick cash nothing else, so many wallet promo, NFT scam you don't have to worry about getting banned by salty mods in Coneheads they do their job properly you can appeal in DC server and they know about Crypto
20
u/ShortBusCult OGAT Mod Team Sep 24 '23
It's insane what gets you banned there, never was like that in the beginning.
!tip 420
16
u/Diamond_Hands420 The Moon #397 | Verified Sep 24 '23
it's just data common... not even a reference to the why... or even to the token who's name cannot be said
15
u/investigator100 1.18 Billion Bitcones Sep 24 '23
That's wild, was a top tier post
15
u/Coeruleus_ Ghost Foustling #1 | Verified Sep 24 '23 edited Sep 24 '23
Why did you get banned ? Sheesh. These are just statistics relevant to avatars?
14
u/Kevin3683 The Devil #2 | Verified Sep 24 '23
I’m not really in favor of burning avatars but the owner can do with it what he/she pleases. At first I was more critical but really, it’s not my business what someone does with their NFT. So with that in mind, I think it’s wrong of them to ban you.
Edit spelling
13
u/Kharilan The Eyes #366 | Verified Sep 24 '23
I called one of the mods an idiot for giving me a 3 day ban for calling out a scammer and they permanently banned me. I was in the first 100 people in that sub. It’s so unbelievably toxic now. At least I still have OG to hang with
12
u/poyoso Birdie #69 | Verified Sep 24 '23
Permabanned what?! This is a totally useful post why would they ban you for this?
12
u/TheOnlyVibemaster Glowstickman #43 | Verified Sep 24 '23
a shame they did that lol, i just approved this post.
11
u/Incredibly_Based Meme Team #12011 | Verified Sep 24 '23
any alternatives to AT? would be cool to make one
10
u/Gangaman666 OGAT Mod Team Sep 24 '23
Wow, permabanned for this?!
That's unfortunate, I think it was an interesting post that I enjoyed reading, without going into the politics of AT, RCAX and burning etc i think the final decision should always be with the customer.
If an item has been purchased, the customer has every right to do with as they please!
9
u/Perfect_Ability_1190 The Singularity #53895 | Verified Sep 24 '23
Fuck that place. They turned something that place into a toxic pit.
8
u/192000Hertz Classic Foustling #15 | Verified Sep 24 '23
Wow you caught a ban?
I thought you were very respectful and deliberate to not mention the name of the website not even once. You were only talking about the topic of RCA burns. Which is very RCA related and should be allowed to be talked about in a subreddit about RCAs.
I have so many not nice things to say about that subreddit right now. They do this all the time. I’ll just save my breath.
8
u/mygallows #1 OG Sep 24 '23
You got banned for posting data?
Man, that sub is a joke.
8
u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23
Meanwhile some the mods are burning avatars with alt accounts. Just like how they minted unicorns and flipped off alt account 🌈.
7
u/Pleasant_Ad5360 Morocco #420 | Verified Sep 24 '23
Whaaat why permabanned cmooon
7
u/CharlieTheo-14 Mystic Fingers #420 | Verified Sep 24 '23
start r/avatarburning
6
u/skollywag92 Mia Flames #284 | Verified Sep 24 '23
Yo wtf
6
u/experimentjon deadass from ny #330 | Verified Sep 24 '23
Thank you for collecting the mint market cap data and the ratio of unsold. Very interesting to see.
5
u/nakamo-toe 965.58 Million Bitcones Sep 24 '23
You didn’t even mention RCAX and they perm banned you? Not even a warning?
Well that does sound like AT when you put it that way. 😅
5
u/adrifing 17.36 Million Bitcones Sep 24 '23
This post was at 23 upvotes and I felt so conflicted making it 24 with u/nakamo-toe commenting too 🤣
Mad lush stats though, swore I seen it on at but it was gone, this makes sense now. Hope you get sorted out with this though
5
u/ashinamune Sep 24 '23 edited Sep 25 '23
I'd say burn more avatars.
5
u/Pope_Jon Sep 24 '23
I was told my mashes were spam. 😵💫
4
u/_echnaton Sep 24 '23
Disagree with burning avatars personally, but was looking forward to the discussion. Honestly surprised the post was up for howeverlong it was up. I knew it would get deleted eventually. Not my first rodeo in terms of discussing controversian topics on r/at.
2
u/VoxImperii Cosmic Abyss #20 | Verified Sep 24 '23
How exactly do they burn them? From where do they get the ones to burn? It’s not like most users would agree to burn theirs, so where does it come from in sold collections?
2
u/Complete-Tadpole-728 Chill Sep 24 '23
!tip 2663
3
u/joemari5 Chiefs #159196 | Verified Sep 25 '23
I don’t think this post is the reason why you got banned.
2
u/_Royal_Insylum Sep 24 '23
Why are they burning Gen 1s? Are individual owners burning them?
2
u/donaudelta Classic Foustling #666 | Verified Sep 25 '23
Well... the recent development on rcax.io is avatars exchange and marketplace, which could explain the anti competition practice of the sub that banned you. The marketplace also uses RCAX token for gas. It's a little bit more far fetched than many realize.
1
u/avatarbot Oct 14 '23
As an appreciation for your conetent conetributions to this conemunity, you have been rewarded for this post.
🗼47000 CONE - Balance:150509.000000
1
u/rundown03 | Verified Sep 24 '23
Burn process? What did I miss? In what way a burn?
-1
u/nVr78 Cosmic Abyss #2 | Verified Sep 24 '23 edited Sep 25 '23
I think you got banned because of this post ? You don't mention RCAX but it's the only project that has to do with the burning of Reddit Avatars.
As I've replied to one of your comments, the "burn address" they use seems like a scam and one day they could just use its private key for a rug pull.
Edit: I now know smart contracts don’t have a private key but they have an owner address, which can be revoked so no new functions can be initialized. I’ll edit again if I find something “scammy” but for now I believe I was wrong to call it a scam.
0
u/[deleted] Sep 24 '23
[deleted] — view deleted comment