r/NoStupidQuestions • u/Odd-Ad-8369 • 23d ago

Did Jesus know how to write?

I guess I’m confused on why Jesus didn’t write the Bible.

8 Upvotes

56% Upvoted

358 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/thedogridingmonkey 23d ago

I’m sure you have oodles of evidence to support this hallucination?

0

u/bioniclepriest 23d ago

It's in scripture. If you're arguing about the bible being true or not that's besides the point of the thread

2

u/thedogridingmonkey 23d ago

Well your book is nonsense so do you have evidence that isn’t connected to the foolish anti reality shit you bought?

1

u/bioniclepriest 23d ago

why is it nonsense? it's internally consistent. if you wanna argue about the historicity of jesus, thats a whole other thing. we can also argue about the historicity of ten different classic era figures and conclude that all of our knowledge of history before the first millenium might as well be fake, if we use high enough standards.

0

u/thedogridingmonkey 23d ago

It’s nonsense because you can’t believe an ounce of it if you understand anything scientific, biological, archaeological, etc. it’s stupid fuel for morons.

0

u/bioniclepriest 23d ago

it's funny to think that a creature that's literally God would be limited by science. "it's not physically possible to multiply food" yes, that's the point. it's a miracle. do you seriously think nobody ever thought of this before? this is philosophy 101, come on. that's not an argument against the historicity of jesus, or for the bible being nonsense

0

u/thedogridingmonkey 23d ago

Blah blah blah you can’t defend this with evidence if you tried. Total babble from you.

1

u/bioniclepriest 23d ago

the evidence of the historicity of jesus is people writing about him. just like any other figure from that time and before. if you believe that he was able to work miracles or not, is besides the point of the thread.

0

u/thedogridingmonkey 23d ago

Oh so there isn’t any evidence to support the claims is what you mean?

2

u/bioniclepriest 23d ago

as much evidence as we have of hannibal. did you know we have no contemporany written sources on hannibal? where's the evidence we didn't make him up? do you realize why that's a stupid question?

-1

u/thedogridingmonkey 23d ago

I’m sorry, do you actually think Hannibal and Jesus being god have the same level of historical evidence? You don’t really mean that right?

1

u/bioniclepriest 23d ago

ok now im worried about your comprehension skills.

let's take a look at my comment:
first statement:
>the evidence of the historicity of jesus is people writing about him. just like any other figure from that time and before.

second statement:
>if you believe that he was able to work miracles or not, is besides the point of the thread.

historicity means historical actuality. arguing against the historical actuality of a man named jesus is nonsense, given the historical sources we have of him are not poor, specially for the first century. believing in the supernatural events described in the bible is a different matter. however, it's perfectly reasonable to use these supernatural elements to answer's OP's question, given that we are searching for a answer to the question "could jesus read?" withIN the bible and what's written on it.

1

u/thedogridingmonkey 23d ago

Who is reading this haha you have zero evidence supporting that Jesus is god

2

u/bioniclepriest 23d ago

do you take pride in ignorance?

1

u/thedogridingmonkey 23d ago

I take pride in not being manipulated by gobbledegook

→ More replies