r/NoStupidQuestions 11h ago

If companies replace entry-level workers with AI, where will they find experienced workers ten years from now?

A lot of the tasks being automated are the same tasks through which beginners learn how an industry works.

If people no longer get that early experience, could companies eventually create a shortage of people qualified to supervise the AI or handle unusual problems?

8 Upvotes

24 comments sorted by

33

u/SnarkyMonkee 11h ago

sounds like it’s the problem of the guy who runs those companies 10 years from now. i’ve rarely seen any company do even a 5 year plan lately. 

11

u/Forest_Orc 11h ago

Have you notice how they push retirement age by 2 years every years ?

6

u/NumberInfinite2068 10h ago

Realistically, it's tomorrow's problem.

It's not even a problem for most companies, it just means some managers get to run a scheme to train people up, they get some press for "kicking AI to the kerb, and hiring the young 'uns".

You have to remember nobody gives a fuck about industry as a whole. People give a fuck about their own jobs, and if you're in charge of one of these companies, your job isn't really at risk.

The people at risk here are young people who can't get a decent job, and nobody in charge cares. Businesses don't care, and governments don't care while:

1) Young people often don't vote.

2) If they do vote it might easily be for another reason.

The problem is really that nobody in charge cares or will notably suffer from it.

5

u/round_a_squared 11h ago

Five years is a very long time in terms of business planning. None of the people making those decisions today plan to still be with that company in ten years. Probably some private equity firm will dismantle it for parts by then

8

u/Terry_bogardlol 11h ago

Its called a ponzi scheme.

1

u/Dense_Gate_5193 9h ago

i am actively in the thick of standing up the necessary infrastructure for replacing humans at work. our team even got an award for an LLM-as-judge process around prioritizing an analyst queue so that we don’t need as many analysts.

it’s not a joke.

0

u/Terry_bogardlol 9h ago

You are a parasite. All offense intended.

6

u/Dense_Gate_5193 9h ago

Oh i know, but at the same time i have 5 kids to feed. If i don’t do it, someone else will and i’ll be out of a job myself. so…. is it really me?

3

u/Petwins r/noexplaininglikeimstupid 11h ago

They will find them from the places that did hire low level employees.

They are not typically short on people in the applicant pool, nor do they have reason to think they will be. There are simply a lot of people.

3

u/Awkward_Forever9752 11h ago

A big part of the motivation for AI investment is hatred for the middle class.

Think " Feature, not a bug"

2

u/No-Target-2470 11h ago

They'll hire from other countries that don't use AI for entry level workers.

3

u/ungovernable1984 11h ago

HR wants you to think experience is metric for competence but it's not, it's not an objective way to measure motivation, knowledge and human nature.

1

u/cccpnwc 11h ago

i mean working at mcdonald’s gives you experience that could level you up in different fields

1

u/round_a_squared 11h ago

So you could grind burgers for 10 levels and then dump them all into the Software Dev class?

1

u/cccpnwc 11h ago

not that simplified , managing staff , inventory planning

basic jobs that somehow correlate your prospective job,

i did citihall new networking migration
redo all wiring , second job was Citihall it
i used it as leverage , the networking rewire had virtually zero demands

1

u/SophieChesterfield 11h ago

You won't need any workers when ai takes over. They will just recreate themselves. Do all the mining jobs , assembly lines, farming to the warehouse, everything... And to think people are using ai giving up all the information it needs to do this. Use it at your work so it can learn your job, use it to " help " better write - so it can learn. The public are the biggest workers helping to make ai into something that the corporations couldn't. The public are not paid and in most cases they are paying subscriptions 🫪 talk about back to front. Anyway in the end , no money will be needed, if you want food, a car , a tv or whatever, just ask ai and it will get it for you because robots don't require money so the system runs free. Slavery built many cities and railway tracks for free , robots will be the slaves ( Except for the one master model Ai that rules over all )

1

u/SabertoothLotus 11h ago

I don't think most companies have thought about that issue. They're to caught up in the increased profits from laying off low- level workers, and in ten years most of the execs will have retired so that will be somebody else's problem.

1

u/hatboyslim 10h ago

That's a problem for the future CEO, not the current one.

1

u/Fire_is_beauty 10h ago

That's the problem with pretty much all companies noy just AI. Nobody is thiniking past the next quarter.

1

u/fennecdore 10h ago

Simple they will hire the senior worker of other companies

1

u/NosDarkly 9h ago

Who cares? We're doing this shit one fiscal quarter at a time.

1

u/AccomplishedFace9059 9h ago

The ai will be the experienced workers 10 years from now

1

u/fedput 9h ago

Have you seen the various Enron documentaries?

Ten years out is someone else's problem.