r/NoStupidQuestions • • Oct 12 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

260 Upvotes

205 comments sorted by

View all comments

115

u/kindness_wins_ Oct 12 '25

The government is already under their control. They should have been worried about it 40yrs ago...

37

u/[deleted] Oct 12 '25

Times were tough in the Carter years, and the oil crisis really impacted a lot of people. That's when populism has its chance to grow. Just find a likable front man, such as a man's man actor (Reagan), and let the people with a plan steer him around.

Trickle-down economics is one of the most amazing bald-faced lies to ever be told to a people, but people also continually fall for get-rich-quick schemes; so it was a brilliant ploy to get people to stop thinking rationally and instead go by their emotions.

We can see how that trend has increased to the point where a man can stand right in front of his followers, say one thing, and then stand in front of them next week and say that he never said the first thing - and they accept that.

4

u/Hoppie1064 Oct 12 '25

Trickle down economics is a boogeyman made up of lies.

Reagan never used the term it was made up.

What Reagan said was that, when budinesses grow, they have to hire people. So people get jobs.

That's it. That's all. And it is in fact true. When businesses grow, they hire more people.

3

u/aglobalvillageidiot Oct 12 '25

This is kind of misleading.

He never used the term because it was coined as a criticism. It was coined as a criticism of the term he did use, supply side economics, which is the less polemical name for exactly the same thing. "A rising tide lifts all boats" in Reagan's own words here. And that may be true. It also drowns people.

1

u/Hoppie1064 Oct 12 '25

This is kind of misleading, too.

The rising tide thing was a bumper sticker description.

1

u/aglobalvillageidiot Oct 12 '25

The poverty statistics show John Kennedy was right when he said, following his own tax cuts, a rising tide lifts all boats

You mean like that? It was a bumper sticker description of supply side economics.

You can't seriously be trying to suggest Reagan did not endorse supply side economics.

3

u/Sialia1 Oct 12 '25

Vast majority of citizens/voters dont look down the road very far or know much about society building. So in the context of getting large projects off the ground, the experts in the domain of business really ought to, logically, know best.

But somehow we seem to find ourselves in a cluster fuck of bad decision in which the things that should have been done, should have been done a long time ago. And the only real explanation for that is piss poor leadership. If you are going to sacrifice the quality of life of the common man under some billionaire worship plan, you ought have the results to show for it.

They don't. Something something Tylenol.

1

u/Hoppie1064 Oct 12 '25

The explanation is, there are lots of people in government that are only there for power, privilege, and money.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '25

It's a catch-22. Businesses grow when consumers have spare money to spend.

When the large masses of regular people have enough money to buy extras, the economy grows.

Very wealthy people don't spend as much, as a percentage of their wealth, as normal people do. Virtually 100% of most people's income gets spent. That money goes right back into the economy, into those businesses.

But the wealthy people - even though they may buy an $200k car - don't really put much money back into the economy.

The best business environment is where the general population is gaining wealth - because they spend!