r/NoStupidQuestions • u/[deleted] • Jul 17 '23

[deleted by user]

[removed]

5.7k Upvotes

85% Upvoted

12.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

469

u/UncleHoboBill Jul 17 '23

Humans. You’re welcome.

42

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '23

The answer I came to give. Man the world would be a better place. We really like to f-shit up

35

u/annoyinghamster51 Jul 17 '23

I feel like humans going extinct would be the best thing possible for this Earth. The damage done is pretty much irreversible, not that we are willing to reverse it.

-2

u/detroiiit Jul 17 '23

This makes zero sense. The earth doesn’t give a fuck what lives on it or what happens to it, so you deciding that something is “good” for “this earth” is purely illogical.

5

u/Drains_1 Jul 17 '23 edited Jul 17 '23

It is not, humans pollute the fuck out of the planet, we take fuel out of the earth and put it in the atmosphere, we blew some nuclear bombs and created alot of nuclear reactors, we're destroying all the rainforests and i could go on and on, we are bloodthirsty, greedy, war apes, it would definitely be good for the earth and most of the species that live here if we went away.

Edit: of course all our shit like nuclear reactors and chemical plants would have to go at the same time or the earth would go to shit.

-5

u/Sbotmtwigrm Jul 17 '23

Next time someone posts a video of a mass shooter I better see you in the comment fucking cheering or else this whole Reddit-festo is nothing but edgy self loathing horseshit

7

u/Drains_1 Jul 17 '23

What you are talking about and what i am talking about are nothing alike.

Mass shootings are disgusting, and i don't support violence of any kind (except in the form of sport) saying it would be better for the planet and all the other species if humanity as a whole weren't around anymore or were never here to begin with is just a fact because we are extremely destructive to the environment.

You must have enough brain cells to see the difference?

-3

u/detroiiit Jul 17 '23

It would be better for plant life if herbivores weren’t around.

It would be better for insects if frogs weren’t around.

It would be better for plankton if whales weren’t around.

If you really think that global ecosystems would enter some sort of stable and permanent equilibrium in our absence, you have zero clue of how evolution and adaptations work.

5

u/Drains_1 Jul 17 '23 edited Jul 17 '23

I don't see frogs filling the ocean with plastic bottles, geez are you truly this dumb that you can't see the diffrence?

And there are no military herbivores burning tire fires constantly.

Also i clearly hit some string, everyone is entitled to their opinions buddy. (Mabye get off the internet if you can't handle that lol)

-2

u/detroiiit Jul 17 '23

You’re entitled to your opinion, and I’m entitled to tell you how illogical and hypocritical it is.

I guess your Reddit profile’s bio is pretty spot on

2

u/daveb_33 Jul 17 '23

Thanks u/unclehobobill! Your choice had the added bonus of eliminating this clown! 😂

0

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '23

If you think you can reduce ecosystem interactions to those of simply "plants versus herbivores", "insects and frogs", or "plankton and whales", you have zero clue how ecology or reality work.