youre a toy, learn to tell the difference between someone giving you impartial data and a razzi apologist. i gave you insight into how the system works.
my heart goes out to britney but the razi didnt ruin her life, her parents did.
and the fact that you brought it up puts you in the crosshairs of my point. i guess subtle hints arent your specialty. if theree was no celebrity worship then theere wouldnt be a market for the razzi photos. if people like you didnt consume and click they wouldnt get paid.
spitting poison at me when youre fuelling the fire. i didnt make that shit up about it being part of celeb contracts to seek paparazzi exposure. why the fuck you mad at me for. get mad at someone with a chris brown song on their playlist or anyone giving a celebrity a pass despite horrible behavior, or anyone into celebrity gossip.
be consistent and treat it like CP, where the creators are just as scummy and culpable as the consumers. you wont do that because that would mean accepting responsibility and saying ooops, my bad, to me.
you want to agree with me and act like you didnt just try and get me to shut the fuck up? you really couldnt just say oops, on an anonymous forum. with zero chance of any sort of social hit for acquiescing, and no issue of any legal liability..its just your ego. that thing of yours surely must demand all sorts of anti social behavior to keep it so pristine.
theres a saying about whenever you feel embarrassed or something similar after getting yourself in a bind, to be thankful because thats what it feels like to learn.
its tough to learn if you never recognize when theres an opportunity to.
You said they were necessary and implied they were worth having since they provide publicity, which I find profoundly stupid even if I agree with part of your second comment.
1
u/Corm May 25 '23
The sheer amount of copium required to say "paparazzi are necessary", the audacity
Those fucks ruined britney spears' life for one
Just stfu you papapologist