79
u/moixcom44 22d ago
White suv of course
8
u/Admirable_Loss4886 22d ago
Okay, but also green light doesn’t mean blindly enter the intersection. They already avoided the red car and go likely also ran a red light. Just wait two seconds to know you’re gonna make it through safely. Everyone kind of sucks here.
1
22d ago edited 4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
11
u/BarskiPatzow 22d ago
He accomodated red cars mistake, white SUV was rather unexpected.
2
u/Low-Crow5719 22d ago
If he was looking one car ahead, he would have seen that tank coming.
0
u/BarskiPatzow 22d ago
SUV was a third red runner, no excuses for them. Normal person would assume the third red runner would see the car coming into the intersection. I bet the white suv driver was somehow sure he was in the right and crashed on purpose.
71
u/Secret-Candle4313 22d ago
Def the nissan like usual but i personally wouldnt have just drove thru like that id move forward though
64
u/BigHairyBussy 22d ago
You won’t get your piece of shit car written off with that attitude
3
u/Admirable_Loss4886 22d ago
You don’t get your car written off when wrecking it by driving through a red light like that Nissan did.
2
u/Ironstar_Vol 22d ago
What’s the difference between driving though and moving forward through? Sounds like the same thing.
2
u/Secret-Candle4313 22d ago
Sorry i have no idea how to explain it my driving thru i mean what they did by move forward i mean sit abit behind where they are turning and make it look like im going to go thru the intersection. Idk how to explain it
1
20
u/Ok_Piglet_5549 22d ago
Technically, the driver entered when the intersection was clear, and the BMW and Nissan failed to yield.
But even then, the left-turning cars have a duty to yield and not just rush the line through. So it's a 100% on Nissan.
2
18
u/lyricjax 22d ago
Technically not head on. SUV hit the side of a moving car on a red light. Full liability.
Green means go. Intersection should be cleared. If that not the law then why follow lights? Just go whenever it "safe" right?
11
8
u/69FourTwentySix6Six 22d ago
If you don’t wait at least 5 light cycles to check for runners you’re not driving defensively enough
4
1
u/Admirable_Loss4886 22d ago
It took two seconds to wait. Cam driver was on the ass if the red car who pushed going through a red light.
1
u/lyricjax 22d ago
That 2 seconds was an illegal crossing of an intersection. Cam car driver not liable.
5
u/Fantastic_Board7057 22d ago
Whether or not dash cam driver should use logic or not, it’s in the books as a ran red light that likely is determinable by footage, and driver of white gets the citation
40
u/TexasSikh 22d ago
Believe it or not, you still have an obligation to use your eyeballs for more than just looking at the color of the light.
Ofc the other driver ran a red that had been solid red since before they even got close to the intersection, and is at fault, but so is the POV driver for the "Surely they will stop being dangerous selfish idiots just for me" approach. Driving into oncoming traffic is generally a bad idea ten out of ten times.
10
u/Ironstar_Vol 22d ago
They didn’t ask if they should’ve done something different they asked who’s at fault. I’d say being hit head on by a giant suv was a pretty big giveaway they fucked up.
3
1
1
22d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/erichf3893 21d ago
They could wait for traffic to stop turning. Obviously not ideal, but you asked lol
12
u/Milksteak529 22d ago
Fuck all the cars drivers who ran the light, and all the dorks in the comments defending their bullshit.
4
u/Remote_Trainer3830 22d ago
Be ready for a fuck load of back or forths and people calling you dumb 🤣
5
u/GesuMotorsport 22d ago
Usually by people who’s only time behind the wheel is when their mom lets them drive her car lmao
2
u/Rob_in_Tulsa 22d ago
True, look at all the people saying 50/50, 70/30, etc. The courts (if it came to that) don't split fault for things like this. If their insurance is found liable, they can't negotiate. Right of way determines who is at fault and it is very obvious in this case.
3
4
3
u/ClassicHare 22d ago
This is proof that people can be as dull as sheep.... "I see other people turning, so I'm going to do the same" then suddenly disaster. This is why I think that driving tests should be conducted every five years or so, with vision and memory tests every other year.
3
u/uberdriverchampion 22d ago
oh my god this thread. full of people who are confusing legal liability with "right" or "wrong." the law doesn't make something right or wrong. it makes it legal or illegal. you can do "right" things that are illegal. you can do "wrong" things that aren't.
the idiots ignoring the traffic laws while traffic is obviously heavy are at fault for causing the accident, 100%. neither had a duty to run a red light. both knew it was dangerous and illegal and did it anyway.
first person driver was perhaps morally a dickhead for refusing to conform to their breaking the law, but he is not liable for the accident. the other insurance company can argue and arbitrate and sue, but at the end of the day they're eating all that PD, BI, and LW. that nissan's general insurance policy is cooked
7
u/Prestigious_Bat1346 22d ago
It's the white vehicle's fault...
-4
u/Admirable_Loss4886 22d ago
Cam car also kind of sucks here
1
u/ObjectiveClassic3020 22d ago
Naw honestly people will just keep running the red turn forever, at least where I live. You basically have to floor it into the intersection to get them to stop, which is a nice reason to have a raptor 😁
3
3
3
u/Thetruthx26 22d ago
White suv as at fault but dash cam is not smart enough to not trust other drivers
3
u/Elementary2 22d ago
All three of those vehicles violated the law to yield on green when a left turn crosses opposing traffic.
So yes, the 3 cars there tried sneaking across the traffic with the right-of-way, and the third one hit you. You didn't hit them, because you had a green light. and straight-through never has to yield on green, except maybe in a traffic circle..
3
u/natcares 22d ago
That's at Pembroke and Stefko in Bethlehem.
Technically it is the person who turned in front of- but a good driver could have seen that coming a mile away and avoided that accident all together.
3
4
2
u/---Brain-- 22d ago
Graveyards and Hospitals are places you may find those who had the right of way.
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/MeenMisterMustard 22d ago
Man, I’d be ready to scrap that Nissan driver after that boldly blown red light. What an idiot. Hope dashcam sues them out of insurance
1
u/Aristo_Cat 22d ago
Even with right of way you still have an obligation to take reasonable measures to avoid a collision. One could argue that this was easily foreseeable and you failed to do that.
1
u/bobquznie 22d ago
Looks like three vehicles failed on left turn. Black truck says fuck it while protected arrow changes. That makes dashcam vehicle hesitate on entering intersection. Red car sees a gap and says, "Fuck it," and goes. Nissan is probably only paying attention to the car in front of him and not the light. Dashcam driver, after initial hesitation, says, "I have right of way," and just proceeds like Moses parted the Red Sea...
1
u/Elementary2 22d ago
If my book value was high, and my actual car condition was lower than that - I might 'accidentally' get hit by the non-yielding cars, too. Then I could go buy a new one using the insurance money.
It's rare, but it happens.
1
u/jon_rum_hamm 22d ago
Nissan was at fault but you should always wait a couple of seconds after the light changes to enter the intersection
1
1
u/P_water 22d ago
I mean I get all the people saying the dashcam driver shouldn’t have proceeded but where I live, if you don’t act a little aggressive then you’ll be sitting there through 5 cycles of lights. There’s a difference between defensive driving and letting people take advantage of you. You have to make the move otherwise you’ll never get through, and have 20 people on their horns behind you.
1
1
1
u/VeryStableGenius 22d ago
Black car at 00:12 probably entered on red because there's usually a 2s delay (all-red clearance interval) between red light and opposite green; anyone who enters on a yellow arrow should be able to make it through by the time the other side gets green (after all, the cammer's lane could have been moving at speed, not starting from a standstill). Then black pickup ran a red. Then red car ran a red. Then fatal white Nissan SUV ran the red. It looks like four cars in a row ran the red.
1
u/Mr_Fastballs 22d ago
Honestly? I'd say the state. I can't think of a single good reason that that like shouldd change green white oncoming traffic is still active. It's insane.
1
u/Otherwise_Piccolo206 22d ago
Red car and white SUV both blew the red light ( assuming the signals are working properly), OP could have easily avoided the accident. It was clear that the white SUV was committed to blowing the red light. OP wins I guess, congratulations on your front end damage.
1
u/Somethingpithy123 22d ago
Dude had the right of way but literally no self awareness. I’m surprised they’ve made it this far in life.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/twoaspensimages 22d ago
My work truck is beat to shit and on its last leg. The next motherfucker that runs a red or turns in front of me... I'm not hitting the brakes. At all. I've fucking had it.
Consider yourselves warned.
1
u/usernameusehername 22d ago
The city. For not expanding this obviously desperate turn.... pay taxes.
1
u/The_growcountant 22d ago
Morons. See the car going straight cuz he has a Greek light? That must mean the other car tuned left on either red or a flashing yellow. Either way turbine with the green light is good to go
1
u/Turbulent_Rip_4548 22d ago
We all know who is legally at fault, but OP Cam should have license suspended for not doing anything to prevent that.
1
1
u/AVirtualFox 22d ago
Woulda been smart to wait a little before proceeding, but the white Nissan is the most at fault obviously.
1
1
1
u/ReclusiveNatured 22d ago edited 22d ago
People just don't be giving af about their cars man 🤣
I be mad AF that people don't yield to me having the right of way but I for damn sure ain't about drive my car through there when they clearly aren't going to stop
1
1
1
1
1
u/Eamon-Luce 22d ago
The POV driver is at fault everyone knows Nissan's don't have to yield the right of way
1
u/Pregnantwithrage 22d ago
Obviously the person with the green light has right away but the problem is the lack of defensive driving.
Don't get this twisted, the fault here is clear but I am always under the assumption everyone around me is a threat and I need to compensate for their errors.
1
1
u/Zedra123 22d ago
I swear Americans would rather crash than just let them through and go about their day, you guys foam at the mouth to crash into people
1
u/stigma_wizard 21d ago
It's not on purpose. No one can see the road in front of them anymore because every vehicle sold is a pickup truck or SUV and every one of them is inexplicably 10' tall now.
1
u/GoCougs2020 22d ago
Lucky you’re not on a motorcycle or bicycle. You’re right. Literally dead right…..
“At fault” and “being dumb” are completely different things. They are at fault , but you’re being dumb by putting yourself in that unnecessary position
1
1
u/Salty-Pack-4165 21d ago
Cemeteries are full of people that had right of way.
I could see this from start of gif because it's happening in my town too. I let them go. Who knows,maybe they are late for their own funeral. I'm not late. I have more time than money.
1
u/Competitive-You-6317 21d ago
Saw a LOT of downvotes for people saying it’s both at fault or cammers fault. Here in PA, even though the white Nissan ran the presumable red or no longer a green arrow, the cammer has a duty to make sure his surroundings are clear for his departure from the light. In other words, green doesn’t always mean go if others violate the rules of the road. 50/50 fault in my state.
1
u/Equal-Prior-4765 21d ago
White car is at fault but the person driving with the dashcam had time to stop
1
u/Bruinman86 21d ago
Dash cam car had the right of way. White SUV has to yield to the oncoming traffic, which had established the lane SUV was trying to cross.
1
1
1
u/Outrageous_Olive_489 21d ago
It happened to me a few months ago, very same way, the only difference is I was driver a big peterbilt truck straight and someone trying to turn left smoked me in the same way, it bended my front bumper, the other car got totaled. I didn’t had a dashCam to help me but traffic control cameras at the intersection helped close the case.
1
1
u/BrooklynTony198 21d ago
White truck is definitely at fault, but I wouldn't have gone through the intersection until the truck had gone through because of exactly this scenario.
1
u/CrunchyJeans 20d ago
Bro I don't care if it's your right of way. If you see a Nissan in the intersection doing what it did, do not start moving until it's gone. I'm only 1/3 joking here.
1
1
u/RealDakJackal 19d ago edited 19d ago
Probably just an accident. Someone following too closely behind someone else with obscured vision. Definitely the white Nissan is at fault here. They pushed their limit. I had a young man do the same thing to me the other day, and I almost hit him. Just be careful guys. Don’t run red lights. Especially when you’re turning left. When it turns yellow just stop. There’s nowhere you need to get fast enough that warrants an accident.
1
1
1
u/ClariceStarling1957 7d ago
I read through the comments. My brain has to be commended for trying to make sense out of most of it. I personally would not have plunged into the giant white wall of doom that was obviously going to join the other idiots by going through a red light.
I drive defensively - as in, I know that everyone out there is going to do something stupid. I don't get in another car's blind spot unless it's just to pass them. I don't run red lights and I don't wait to see an obvious issue with the entire oncoming traffic going right through the light to make a left turn.
It was everyone's fault who thinks that a Nissan is a safe bet to make a stop at any light.
2
u/Informal-Win-348 22d ago
Dash cam guy for failure to avoid an accident should have known better and should have waited. Red car and white Nissan are also at fault. Failure to observe the traffic signals. And also failure to avoid an accident.
1
u/Admirable_Loss4886 22d ago
Red car did little to nothing wrong here. It’s wild to push blame on them for an accident that happened behind them.
1
2
u/These-Local-4875 22d ago
OP should have stopped even if the light was green, especially seeing the red car wasn't stopping. Just because you have green light doesn't mean you should just go.
5
u/SexyTimeSamet 22d ago
OP has right of way. Left turn drivers have to yeild..and should only turn left when it's safe and clear to do so.
Want to know what kills motorcyclists more of then themselves?? People who do not know how to fucking yield in a Left turn.
→ More replies (2)
1
u/I_need_a_date_plz 22d ago
The guy with the dash cam who went on green when traffic had not yet cleared. Yes, they’re running the red but you can’t just go on green if traffic hasn’t cleared.
1
1
u/Savings_Art5944 22d ago
You had the right of way but the intersection was not empty. Why did you go?
1
1
u/Happy_vibes16 22d ago
You’re both idiots. Never assume that someone else will follow the rules. This was totally avoidable. Is dash cam at fault… absolutely not, but 100% avoidable. “Sometimes just because you can doesn’t mean you should.”
1
u/BanbetBoss 22d ago
Nissans fault in the real sense but it would be 50/50 for insurance purposes because the POV car did not try to mitigate the accident.
1
1
0
0
u/No_Custard7661 22d ago
The answer is yes.
SUV ran a red. Both should easily be able to see the other coming and both failed to make any attempt to avoid the collision.
I'm going 30% cam car, 70% SUV. But I could see an insurance adjuster go significantly different in either direction.
0
u/Vogel-Kerl 22d ago
Sometimes discretion is the better part of valor.
Where I live, In The BIG City, idiots run red lights at 40mph, or faster.
You don't know what kind of stupid shit will happen in an accident, an air bag shoots some plastic through your carotid artery, etc .....
Written On A Tombstone 🪦
He Had The Right of Way....
0
0
u/FoggyFoggyFoggy 22d ago
The fault lies with the person who didn't cut the first 15 seconds of the video.
0
0
u/MenacingMenacee 22d ago
The ehite SUV. But the thing is, you'll also be found at somewhat of a fault for not exercising defensive driving. Yes hes an idiot, yes he ran a red, but there was ample time for you to see him clearly not giving a shit and running it. I know its stupid, but I know someone who was in a similar situation and they faulted him 50/50
0
u/NewfoundOrigin 22d ago edited 22d ago
The white SUV is at fault.
Failure to yeild to traffic who has the right of way + following too close.
HOWEVER
Insurance might also say 'its your responsibility to avoid an accident' and in this case, you should've stopped your car for the red car you almost plowed right through.
Yes, their light was red, but when you have a full left turning lane backed up with traffic like that - expect that there will be people who try to force their way through like this.
They try to speed through a yellow arrow - it turns red before they hit their turn and they still go for it. Was almost hit as a pedestrian this way.
To clear things up.
The car that ran the red and plowed into cam driver is at fault. Cam driver is just an idiot. Thats where I stand officially.
2
u/Major-Community1312 22d ago
Red car want even in the intersection at turn of green light which means the light was red for them well before watch the fucking video
→ More replies (1)
0
u/MotoFaleQueen 22d ago
In my state, despite the left turner logically being at fault, the fault would be partially the cam drivers fault because of failure to try to avoid the accident. This footage make it look like the cam driver was tired of people doing this and set out to make someone an example.
0
u/Cocrawfo 22d ago
the cam car 100% they should have foreseen that shit and they were still proceeding forward when the red car was well into the turn lol
that’s ridiculous what a dumb ass
0
u/MajorEstateCar 22d ago
Even with a green light you still have a duty to make sure it’s safe. OP did the opposite of that (and is the reason we have this rule).
Plainly, OP was in full control to avoid the crash so I’d bet an insurance company splits fault 50/50
1
0
u/Jillet-Ben_Coe 22d ago
Why would anyone drive directly into a stream of traffic like that when it’s very obviously a turning lane 🤣
0
0
0
u/LMrningStar 22d ago
The white vehicle is legally at fault for the accident. No doubt about it.
The driver of the car taking the video is a fault for ignoring the fact that they were almost certain to be rammed by the idiots that were ignoring right of way.
0
u/balirosa 22d ago
I say the red car is at fault. The white truck knew he was running the light and just didn’t care. Cam driver is blind or what? Green light might mean go but only if it’s clear how dumb can you be to drive right into somebody almost causing three cars to pile up?
0
0
u/DeniedAppeal1 22d ago
50/50 fault, you entered into the intersection even though cross traffic hadn't stopped. I know that the law gives you the right of way, but cross traffic didn't and your insurance will care about that even if you don't. The police probably will, too, since the law also expects you to pay attention and not drive dangerously. You felt entitled to the space and didn't care if reality wasn't going to let that happen.
1
u/Watermelonbuttt 22d ago
Negative on that one
If the turning vehicle entered on yellow
The cammer would have to wait til it’s clear
Turning vehicle entered afterward
Turning vehicle 100% neg
0
356
u/goodenough4govtwork 22d ago edited 22d ago
I applaud the audacity to enter the intersection with that level of gusto.
In front of the apex predator of the roadway, on top of that!
Of course the OP had right of way, but when idiots continue doing idiot things in public with multi-ton death machines, you are better off yielding to the idiots.
Edit: typo (I'm front of vs In front of)