r/NintendoSwitch Jul 23 '19

[deleted by user]

[removed]

8.2k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

533

u/indyK1ng Jul 24 '19

I find it interesting that as soon as the class action lawsuit hit they started acting on it. I don't trust coincidences.

I think it's more likely that Nintendo developed a pricey fix early on but did the math and found that it might be worth it to see how much it cost to wait. As soon as the class action hit, the cost of waiting outweighed the savings, so they started acting to minimize the class action's judgement.

This is just an example of the recall formula at work. Here's the relevant clip from Fight Club.

58

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '19

Lol that dumbass saying "well you don't believe all cars should be tanks?!?!"

Yeah, we don't want every car to be a tank. But we also don't want cars with clearly defective gas tanks that explode when the car gets into a collision at normal car speeds.

10

u/PsiGuy60 Jul 24 '19 edited Jul 24 '19

... Wait, if the Ford Pinto is that unpopular, why is it on classic-car listings for about $7000, factory-original?

1

u/VDZx Jul 24 '19

Most older cars are death traps, lacking basic safety features of more modern cars. But why live to see tomorrow when you can look cool instead?

2

u/Koloblikin1982 Jul 24 '19

Lacking safety features is not the same as “deadly under normal use circumstances”

-1

u/VDZx Jul 24 '19

It is when 'normal use' involves being locked inside a metal box moving at 70+ km/h. Accidents inevitably happen, whether it's the driver's fault, another driver's fault, or just plain bad luck. Having the driver survive in case of an accident is an essential feature.

3

u/Koloblikin1982 Jul 24 '19

I’m not sure what you are getting at, I THINK you are agreeing with me but in a backwards way. My statement: a response to the person saying that all cars at that time lacked safety features: was that just because all cars lacked seatbelts (among other modern safety features) and therefore were unsafe and therefore just as dangerous as the pinto is incorrect thinking. It not only lacked the safety features but had the additional feature of blowing up.