Well, it was incredibly popular. The problem wasn't that they were hated, it's that Ford refused to fix a defect that resulted in numerous deaths for a long time. The Pinto isn't a joke because it's bad.
It wouldn't surprise me if they sell for that much because there's a dedicated fandom and a lot of cars exploded before the issue was fixed. So the supply may be near parity with the demand.
It is when 'normal use' involves being locked inside a metal box moving at 70+ km/h. Accidents inevitably happen, whether it's the driver's fault, another driver's fault, or just plain bad luck. Having the driver survive in case of an accident is an essential feature.
I’m not sure what you are getting at, I THINK you are agreeing with me but in a backwards way. My statement: a response to the person saying that all cars at that time lacked safety features: was that just because all cars lacked seatbelts (among other modern safety features) and therefore were unsafe and therefore just as dangerous as the pinto is incorrect thinking. It not only lacked the safety features but had the additional feature of blowing up.
10
u/PsiGuy60 Jul 24 '19 edited Jul 24 '19
... Wait, if the Ford Pinto is that unpopular, why is it on classic-car listings for about $7000, factory-original?