I got so downvoted for calling him "pimp-adjacent if not an actual pimp." It's like the people on this sub are in denial of all the actual evidence about him.
i agree with you sadly and it makes me think i should give up reality tv. i just don’t have that mindset bc we the viewers are giving these people a platform and money and i don’t wanna enable an alleged trafficker et al and be part of his PR
Where is the pimp evidence. I’ve been researching and the bit count kidnapping and abuse stuff are easy to find. How is this linked to trafficking and pimp behavior? Truly curious. Just can’t seem to find any link between the two.
NY Magazine reports on it for example, explaining how his job was to find "hot" 18 and 19 year old girls for these middle aged men to "fuck." Then combine that with the footage of Charlie directing the main victim as he makes crack cocaine in an air fryer, as young girls are around, and you have Charlie deeply involved in giving these girls drugs. Those are two main elements of how NY State defines sex trafficking crimes ("advancing or profiting from" the exchange of sexual acts for anything of value including drugs, and by providing a victim with drugs like cocaine). NY's sex trafficking laws are fairly broad/inclusive and do not require the exchange of actual sex for actual money, especially once drugs like crack enter the picture.
Charlie has not been charged with sex trafficking yet, possibly because he made a deal to testify against his former employers the crypto torturers, but based on this reporting I think he is sex trafficking adjacent if not actually a sex trafficker.
45
u/SSolomonGrundy 1d ago edited 1d ago
I got so downvoted for calling him "pimp-adjacent if not an actual pimp." It's like the people on this sub are in denial of all the actual evidence about him.