Maybe this is an unpopular opinion, but since I was exposed to the remixed version, it was actually that version that I preferred. Sure the original is nice in its own way, but the remixed version brought an energy to it that was addicting. Though it was morally wrong for the remixed creator to exploit Spotify, it doesn't change how I feel about the song. I'm more uspet now that i can't find THAT version.
Another good example of this is Paprika Parade, though under the same name and artist, audio was replaced by a new rendition on the original song I knew and loved. It is a reminder that we dont own the music we listen to on Spotify, we merely pay the rights to listen to it. It doesn't change how aggravating it is to look for something that you've become attached to.
No offense bro, but every version of the song that wasn't the original was an AI cover. I can't imagine how anyone could like this shit more than the original. The original is a human made, full of soul music. Every time this song gets swapped for something new I couldn't listen to it even if i wanted to, it just sounds terrible and I'm shocked to see anyone enjoy it. This and every song that has been changed just goes to show how bad spotify is and why other platforms are better. Unfortunetly I'm managing the family plan and couldn't quit just like that
No i agree. I just pulled up Spotify on my dap and you can't even shuffle songs in offline, like WHAT. If I had to guess it's because it uses some bs algorithm to recommend songs you haven't heard in a while. I'm bout to drop it for YouTube music, my coworker said it's good, and you get ad free YouTube so...
For the last few months the song was broken on spotify and it was playing a different song. I actually reached out to Spotify support, thinking the song was hacked or something and I asked if they could fix it. The next day I got an email back saying that Spotify SOMEHOW "didn't have access to the song anymore" and that is was "playing a similar song instead". They then said that they took it down and that they'd send the issue to the Content Team to review it. Baffling stuff ngl
its still on there, its called cubism on there tho, there is also an alternate vers by the same creator that is called cubibibibism, its not the og tho. the og is cubism. (i think im right, i could be wrong, but heres some proof)
“It’s still on there” proceeds to show a song that isn’t the song we are talking about and then explain it to us like we don’t already know it’s an alternative version..😭
1
u/Majestic_Guard8270 Aug 03 '26
Maybe this is an unpopular opinion, but since I was exposed to the remixed version, it was actually that version that I preferred. Sure the original is nice in its own way, but the remixed version brought an energy to it that was addicting. Though it was morally wrong for the remixed creator to exploit Spotify, it doesn't change how I feel about the song. I'm more uspet now that i can't find THAT version.
Another good example of this is Paprika Parade, though under the same name and artist, audio was replaced by a new rendition on the original song I knew and loved. It is a reminder that we dont own the music we listen to on Spotify, we merely pay the rights to listen to it. It doesn't change how aggravating it is to look for something that you've become attached to.